My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12130
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.126.J
Description
San Miguel Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
4
Date
2/15/1984
Title
San Miguel Project: Features for Rescoping Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />SAN MIGUEL PROJECT <br /> <br /> <br />C"j <br />~ <br />-- <br />. . <br /> <br />o ' <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Features for Rescoping Study <br /> <br />The area proposed to be served by the reconfigured San Miguel Proj ect <br /> <br /> <br />offers opportunities for maximizing development of high elevation runoff and <br /> <br /> <br />all gravity systems without resorting to high lift pumping plants or tunnels <br /> <br /> <br />as proposed by various Bureau of Reclamation studies. There is however, a <br /> <br /> <br />great deal more irrigable land than there is water to serve it from these <br /> <br /> <br />sources. Rescoping and analysis of potential development in the project area <br /> <br /> <br />will identify the more promising and cost effective features for early <br /> <br /> <br />development and others which could be deferred but still retained as a part <br /> <br /> <br />of the overall plan. The level of investigation performed under the study <br /> <br /> <br />program should be varied so that the concept of phased development can be <br /> <br /> <br />implemented. <br /> <br />The study process should also take full advantage of work which has <br /> <br /> <br />already been done so that time and money are not wasted in restudying plans <br /> <br />that have previously been found totally impractical. <br /> <br />The following discussion identifies the individual features proposed for <br /> <br /> <br />inclusion in the revised project. The order in which they are listed <br /> <br /> <br />suggests the initial emphasis that they should receive from detailed <br /> <br /> <br />feasibility level analysis for those near the top to preliminary or <br /> <br /> <br />reconnaissance level near the bottom. A brief discussion of each phase <br /> <br /> <br />follows the priority list. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.