Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OJJ4..i3 <br /> <br />Commissioner collects daily diversion data <br />on the various ditches diverting below the <br />outfall of the Colorado Springs wastewater- <br />treatment plant. This requires three trips per <br />week down the creek to retrieve data from <br />recorders on the ditches. Colorado Springs <br />Utilities calls in daily reports of water <br />returning to the creek at their wastewater- <br />treatment plant, and at the Fort Carson treat- <br />ment plant, which obtains its water from <br />Colorado Springs. These returns are divided <br />into two components, the first of which is <br />attributable to Colorado Springs' diversion of <br />native water and the other of which is attribut- <br />able to use of non-native trans mountain <br />water. The Water Commissioner also gathers <br />daily streamflow data from the six gaging <br />stations along the creek by accessing the <br />Satellite Monitoring System via the USGS <br />computer located in Denver. <br />The program tracks the different types <br />of water by assessing a transit loss against <br />the non-native flow as it progresses down the <br />creek, taking into account the amount of <br />native waters being diverted from, or being <br />added to, the stream by way of tributary <br />inflows or return flows from water use. Thus, <br />the Water Commissioner is better able to <br />determine the amount of native water avail- <br />able for diversion at each headgate. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Since April 1989, a FORTRAN computer <br />program has been used to compute transit losses for <br />transmountain return flows (TRF's) that are <br />discharged into Fountain Creek by the City of Colo- <br />rado Springs (CCS). The transit-loss accounting <br />program, which was developed as a'result of a study <br />completed in 1987, enables daily accounting of (I) the <br />TRF's, (2) the transit losses for the TRF's, and (3) the <br />native streamflows (NSF's) (nontransmountain water) <br />in Fountain Creek from the CCS wastewater-treatment <br />facility (WWTF) downstream to the Arkansas River. <br />Tn the years following 1989, a number of <br />changes were made to the accounting program; <br />however, the program and the changes made to it have <br />never been documented completely. Therefore, the <br />U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with <br />the CCS and the Southeastern Colorado Water Conser- <br />, vancy District (SECWCD), completed a study to <br /> <br />document the accounting program and prepared a <br />report that: (I) Describes the computational steps and <br />procedures of the original accounting program; <br />(2) describes the changes that were made to the <br />program in 199\-92 and in 1994-95; (3) provides a <br />user manual; and (4) documents the procedures for <br />maintaining the accounting program, the auxil iary <br />programs, and the numerous output files. <br />Application of the accounting program is based <br />on a system of 14 subreaches, 16 nodes, and 4 stream <br />segments. The subreaches are pans of the study reach <br />having uniform hydraulic and hydrologic characteris- <br />tics, and the nodes, which delimit the subreaches, <br />primarily are defined on the basis of location of <br />streamflow-gaging stations and streamflow diversions <br />along Fountain Creek. The stream segments are the set <br />of subreaches between the gaging-station nodes. The <br />accounting program requires input of the following <br />data: (I) Daily quantities of TRF and native return <br />flow discharged into Fountain Creek at the CCS <br />WWTF; (2) daily mean discharge at each of the <br />gaging stations along Fountain Creek; and (3) daily <br />mean discharge at each diversion operating along <br />Fountain Creek. <br />Tn computing the estimated quantities of TRF in <br />Fountain Creek and the associated transit losses, the <br />accounting program uses two sets of computations. <br />The first set of computations is made between any two <br />adjacent gaging stations (stream-segment computa- <br />tions); these computations estimate the loss or gain in <br />NSF between the two adjacent gaging stations. The <br />second set of computations is made between any two <br />adjacent nodes (subreach computations); the actual <br />transit-loss computations are made in the subreach <br />computations, using the result from the stream- <br />segment computations. The stream-segment computa- <br />tions are completed for a stream segment, then the <br />subreach computations are completed for each <br />subreach in the stream segment. When the subreach <br />computations are completed for all subreaches in a <br />stream segment, the stream-segment computations are <br />repeated for the next stream segment, followed again <br />by subreach computations; the process continues until <br />computations are completed downSlI:eam through <br />subreach 14. <br />Use of the accounting program is highly depen- <br />dent on operation of a gaging-station network on <br />Fountain Creek. The network originally consisted of <br />fi ve gaging stations and was expanded to six stations <br />in 1995. Each station is equipped with a <br /> <br />../ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />SUMMARY 37 <br />