Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(J J ;\4 ..; 0 <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />user for the dirch numbers for which the diversion data <br />are to be changed, (3) queries the user to input each <br />new diversion quantity, and (4) repeats the display of <br />the diversion data for error checking and additional <br />changes. If the response is no, the program proceeds to <br />the input of the TRF diversion discharge data. <br />The data input steps for each of the three TRF <br />diversion categories (FAP TRF diversions, CCS TRF <br />diversions that are exchanged, and CCS TRF diver- <br />sions that are not exchanged) are identical. For each <br />category, the program first queries the user if there are <br />any TRF diversions for that particular category. If the <br />response is yes, the program repeats the previous <br />display of the NSF diversion table, but lists data for <br />the appropriate TRF diversions from the last computa- <br />tion date. Changes to the TRF diversions are made in <br />the same way as changes were made for the NSF <br />diversions; when all the diversion data for a TRF cate- <br />gory are correct, the program proceeds 10 the next <br />category. If the response to the "any TRF diversions?" <br />query is no, for any TRF category, the program defines <br />that TRF diversion at each ditch as zero and proceeds <br />to the next TRF diversion category. <br />For each TRF diversion in each TRF diversion <br />category, the accounting program makes three intemal <br />checks on the data. The first check is that the account <br />balance for a ditch must be greater than zero before a <br />TRF diversion can be specified. The account balance <br />is computed by the program as the difference between <br />the PURCHSD and the USED account values <br />(table 5); the program also converts the balance to <br />cubic feet per second. If the account balance is less <br />than or equal to zero, the program only allows a TRF <br />diversion of zero for that ditch. The second check is <br />that the TRF diversion specified for a ditch may not be <br />larger than the TRF account balance for that ditch. If <br />the TRF diversion is larger than the account balance. <br />the program defines the TRF diversion as zero, but the <br />user can specify another TRF diversion quantity that is <br />less than or equal to the account balance for that ditch. <br />The third check is that the sum of all TRF diver- <br />sions in each TRF diversion category may not exceed <br />the TRF release quantities that are input. For this <br />check, however, the TRF release quantity is assumed <br />to be 20 percent less than the actual release quantity. <br />This assumption is used because the computed <br />purchase quantity for each TRF diversion' (see the <br />"Changes to Account for Diversion of Transmountain <br />Return Flows" section, p. 15-16) usually is larger than <br />the specified diversion. Without this assumption, spec- <br /> <br />': <br /> <br />~: <br /> <br />,.' <br /> <br />ifying a total TRF diversion quantity (for each TRF <br />diversion category) that is equal to the TRF release <br />quantity specified on input would be possible; in this <br />case, because of (I) transit loss as the TRF moves <br />downstream and (2) the TRF diversions, the TRF <br />could be less than or equal 10 zero in the transit-loss <br />computations. If the FAP TRF or the CCS TRF quan- <br />tity is less than or equal to zero at any node in the <br />computations, the program prints an error message, <br />SlOps all computations. and returns to the program <br />options. Use of the 20-percent reduction assumption <br />decreases the likelihood of a program SlOp because the <br />total of the specified TRF diversions always is less <br />than the TRF release quantities specified on input. <br />In the third check just described, the accounting <br />program defines the following TRF release quantities <br />for each TRF diversion category: (I) For the FAP TRF <br />diversions, the TRF release quantity is equal to the <br />FAP release quantity at the CCS WWTF plus the FAP <br />release quantities at the Security. Widefield, and Foun- <br />tain WWTF's, when release data becomes available <br />for these three WWTF's (see the "Return-Flow <br />Discharge Data" section, p. 33); (2) for the CCS TRF <br />diversions that are exchanged, the TRF release quan- <br />tity is equal to the CCS TRF release quantity at the <br />CCS WWTF plus the Fort Carson TRF; and (3) for the <br />CCS TRF diversions that are not exchanged. the TRF <br />release quantity is equal to the CCS TRF release-quan- <br />tity sum computed in item 2, minus the sum of the <br />CCS TRF diversions (in item 2) that are exchanged. <br />When input of all NSF and TRF diversion <br />discharge data is completed, the accounting program <br />sums the NSF and TRF diversions in each category by <br />stream segment and by subreach for use in the stream- <br />segment and subreach computations (figs. 4 and 5). <br />After summing the diversion discharge data, the <br />program writes all of the newly input TRF and native <br />return-flow discharge data, gaging-station discharge <br />data, and NSF and TRF diversion discharge data to the <br />divers.fit file, and then proceeds to the transit-loss <br />computations. <br /> <br />Transit-Loss Computations <br /> <br />Following the 1994-95 program changes, <br />transit-loss computations were made by the <br />accounting program for two TRF entities-the FAP <br />and the CCS TRF's. The computations made for each <br />TRF entity are identical to the computations in the <br />original accounting program (figs. 4 and 5), except for <br /> <br />34 Descriptions 01 the Program Changes (1989-97) and a User Manual tor 8 Transit-Loss Accounting Program <br />Apptted to Fountain Creek Between Cotoredo Springs and the Arksne.. Rtver, Cotoredo <br />