My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12111
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:24:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/3000
Title
San Luis Valley Project Rio Grande Division Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />state of Texas <br /> <br />A. . Position <br /> <br />1. Storage in Colorado adverse to New Mexico and Texas and <br />would aggravate the water shortage situation. <br /> <br />B. Recommendation <br /> <br />1. Wagon lmeel Gap Dam and reservoir be disapproved and <br />no further consideration be given to its development. <br /> <br />Corps of Engineers <br /> <br />A.. Position <br /> <br />1. Question method of allocation. <br />2. Allocation to F. C. too high - maximum indicated 15,000,000. <br />3. Questions allocating a,M costs to F. C. <br /> <br />B.' Suggestions <br /> <br />1. Suggests Bureau should collaborate with Corps to arrive <br />at equitable F. C. allocations. <br />2. Suggests coordination among conoerned field offices of design <br />for dam and outlet works to insure operation for flood <br />control in accordance with regulations to be prescribed by <br />Secretary of ArI1\Y. <br /> <br />Department of Agricul ture <br /> <br />A. Position <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Forest Service improvements that will be affected should be <br />replaced as a project cost. <br />Need forest protection road on northeast side of reservoir. <br />Quel;ltions advisability of prediCating increased value of farm <br />products on such a large percentage of area in potato production. <br />Question of coordination of surface storage vs. groundwater pumping. <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />B. Recommendations <br /> <br />1. Forest protection road, 14' wide, with turnouts and maximum grade <br />of 10% on northeast side of reservoir. <br /> <br />Federal Power Commission <br /> <br />A. Position <br /> <br />1. Questions dependability of plant capacity even at 26,000 kw instead <br />of average of 44,000 kw in reporto <br /> <br />B. Suggestions <br /> <br />r ~ ~ i" '.~ or'! <br />",J', .J:..__~ "'-...;.. <br /> <br />1. Restudy of power features is needed. <br />2. Should pow~r not be installed initially, penstocks should be <br />installed or outlet works cOnstructed so as to provide for <br />flltllr" Tl-:'l"T~1" ~",v"l""m'mt ,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.