Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />I" <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN STONE: This meeting of the Colorado River <br />Basin States C6iriinittee was called to convene at this time on <br />account of the fact that most of the members of theConnnittee" <br />with one or two exceptionsJwereto be here for the Compact nego <br />tiations. If that aituation had not existed, it woUld have bee <br />necessary to have a meeting of the Connnittee in any event becau e <br />two or three matters have arisen requiring the attention of the <br />Connnittee. <br /> <br />," <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />First, Frank Clayton, who is Qounsel for the Inter- <br /> <br />national Boundary and Water Connnission is here. In compliance <br /> <br />with the request of the ~~nnn~t~etmade at a recent meeting at <br />~,\.,~.t.<t" ~'L.4~ <br />Salt Lake City, he is s..o'IIi:;~ "W{;~):J.e 1},ssin S'\;ates,,-4;9!!!Wittee <br />~~f( ~'V'1;I"'~ IV'..1J4A'J,tM <br />a proposed contract of the ~t!a",~a relating to <br />1/ <br />, <br />matters at the boundary and growing out of the Mexican Treaty. <br />,,~"Ii\p'F'~.'" <br />Second, this Connnittee set up at its last session in <br />Denver a subconnnittee, of which Judge Howell of Ogden, Utah,is <br />Chairman, to prepare for the hearings before Congressional com- <br />mittees on the McCarran Resolution and on the Hinshaw Bill. <br />There have been some substantial developments with respect to <br />the McCarran Resolution which must be taken up at this meeting <br />. in order to make definite arrangements for the work of the <br />connnittee in ~ashi~ <br />There ari\ther <br />the Committee. <br /> <br />matters which should be considered by <br /> <br />I'. <br /> <br />I" <br /> <br />Relative to the first~~~~Y1~..{..~!J~. <br />presentation by :Mr. Clayton is" >. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />i <br />I . <br />.I'''t. <br />