My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12092
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:23:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.600
Description
ARCA Annual Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Date
12/13/1966
Author
ARCA
Title
Eighteenth Annual Report Arkansas River Compact Administration for the Year 1966
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />season diversions ill both states W::lS tk greiltest since 1949-30 and was <br />more than 50 per cent grC'<ltcr than the ;cventeen'year average. <br /> <br />Reservoir releases during the irrigation season were 280,430 acre' <br />feet. Demands for irrigation water during the season were 280,503 <br />acre,feet. Total diversions v..'C'rc 66.327 ,lcre.feet grcater than the irriga. <br />tion releases for the sr(lson. Runoff from the area below the reservoir <br />and return flows provided 19 per cent of the water diverted during <br />the irrigation season. <br /> <br />Releases from the reservoir avernged 250 c.f.s. from November 1, <br />1965, to March 31, 1966, and 661 d.s. irom April 1, 1966, to Gctcher <br />31, 1966. Statelinc flows for corrLspnnding periods averaged 333 c.f.s. <br />and 418 c.f.s. respectively. <br /> <br />The total discharge for the year <It Garden City was 146,140 acre- <br />feet of which I I 4,1 SO acre' feet or 78 per cent occurred as winter flows. <br /> <br />8. Gaging Stations <br /> <br />Streamflow records of satisfactory accuracy were obtained at the <br />Compact stations. Emphasis was continued on performing additional <br />field work and providing streamflO\'\' data to the Administration and to <br />State officials as required. <br /> <br />It will be noted that the computed daily demands by Colorado and <br />Kansas in Appendices B'lO and R,ll do not tllwtlys agrec with the <br />actual measured releascs at the gaging station, as shown in Appendix <br />B,6. Part of this discrepancy is the result of the lag in time involved in <br />adjusting the outlrt gat€".s in the darn and when the outflow is measured <br />at the gage. The rest of the discrep<lncy is due primarily to the rating <br />table changes, caused by a shifting channel, being unavailable at the <br />time of changes in releases. Relocating the gage nearer to the dam and <br />installation of an artificial control section \vould minimize the variations <br />in the records. <br /> <br />The gaging station on the Purgatoire River near Lils Anima:- was <br />operated at temporary sites during the year. Tt was not practicahle to <br />install the radio equipment ::I.t the temporary locations. However, the <br />station was moved back to the former site at the new Highway 101 <br />bridge and the radio equipment put ll1 operation during November 1966. <br /> <br />The station on the Arkansas River near Coolidge was moved down- <br />stream about 1500 feet to the h!ghwJ}' hridge. This change was neces' <br />sary because of the extensive ffcsion at the old site during the June 1965 <br />flood. <br /> <br />Conditions at the st,lticn on the Arkamas River at Las Animas <br />worsened during the ycu ;tnd it wa-: neces.sary to construct a low dike <br />across the by'pass channel to ccntinue operations at the present site:. <br />The station will be moved upstream to the: new Highway 50 hridgc <br />when the !ow,wfl.ter channel at that point hfl.s stabilized. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.