My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12088
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:23:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1996
Author
USGS
Title
Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin - Southeastern Colorado - 1990-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br /><I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1792 <br /> <br />The percentages of instantaneous total-recoverable cadmium loads contributed to the Arkansas River from <br /> <br />the main stem of the river and from the intervening tributaries in their respective reaches are presented in table 6. <br /> <br />These data provide a reasonable estimation of the relative magnitude of cadmium loading in the seven main-stem <br /> <br />reaches of the upper Arkansas River Basin. It should be recognized, that at many sites, most total-recoverable cad- <br /> <br />mium concentrations were less than the detection limit (< Il!gIL) and were estimated to equal 0.7 I'gIL for the <br /> <br />purposes of load computation. Therefore, the cadmium-load contributions from some sources may be overesti- <br /> <br />mated. The best example of this relation and the worst case of the inadequacy of the cadmium load estimates is at <br /> <br />Lake Creek downstream from Twin Lakes Reservoir, which contributes a substantial amount of the streamflow in <br /> <br />reach 2. The total-recoverable cadmium concentration in all of the samples collected at this site was less than the <br /> <br />detection limit. Therefore, the estimated loads are more a function of streamflow than of cadmium concentration <br /> <br />and are probably overestimated, because the total-recoverable cadmium concentrations were always less than I <br /> <br />I'gIL. Downstream from Granite, in reaches 3 through 7, cadmium contributions from tributaries within their <br /> <br />respective main-stem reach were relatively small (generally < 10 percent) compared to the main-stem loads (table <br /> <br />6). <br /> <br />Table 6 near here. Average percentage of seasonal instantaneous streamflow and instantaneous <br />total-recoverable cadmium load contributed to the downstream main-stem site in a reach by the <br />npstream main-stem site and the intervening tributaries in the same reach, April 1990-March 1993 <br /> <br />.~"':,tllF;I'O~~A~ D~~~;l <br />:1'V '3 ~~ ~ .. <br />Subject to Revision,. <;:_ <br />;)<) NOT QUOTE OR R~L;:~~~ <br />'o,:,'ding Approval by Dlrel..l0" <br />, ~., U.S. Gsc!o~:col Survey <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.