My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12088
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:23:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1996
Author
USGS
Title
Water-Quality Assessment of the Arkansas River Basin - Southeastern Colorado - 1990-93
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />',",e",-- <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1782 <br /> <br />reach could be attributed to the two measured tributaries in the reach. Groundwater inflow and unmeasured return <br /> <br />flow may account for the remainder. In the Pueblo area, median concentrations in the river increased by 15 percent <br /> <br />due to tributary inflow from Fountain Creek. Downstream of Pueblo, concentrations increased steadily to Catlin <br /> <br />Dam (about 5 mg/L per mile). A 71 percent increase in median concentration occurred between Catlin Dam and <br /> <br />La Junta (16 mg/L per mile) as irrigation-return flows comprised a larger portion of the streamflow. Between La <br /> <br />Junta and Las Animas, the dissolved-solids concentration in the river increased slightly. Median dissolved-solids <br /> <br />concentrations increased 183 percent or at a rate of about 30 mg/L per mile from Las Animas to Coolidge; the high- <br /> <br />est median concentration in the basin was 3,825 mgIL at Coolidge. Evapo-concentration of dissolved salts resulting <br /> <br />from the use and re-use of irrigation water throughout the lower basin resulted in a more than lO-fold increase in <br /> <br />dissolved solids in the lower basin. Overall, median dissolved-solids concentrations increased from a minimum of <br /> <br />62.5 mg/L at Granite to 3,825 mgIL at Coolidge. <br /> <br />Seasonally, dissolved solids in the upper basin were smallest during snowmelt runoffand highest during low <br /> <br />flow. As such, the relation between total-dissolved solids and streamflow in the upper basin was inversely propor- <br /> <br />tional. Dissolved-solids concentrations were generally as much as 2.5 times larger during the low-flow period than <br /> <br />during snowmelt runoff. <br /> <br />In natural waters, specific conductance ia a good estimator oftolal-dissolved-solids concentrations (Hem. <br /> <br />1985). Regression models of specific conductance and IOtal dissolved solids were developed utilizing least-squares <br /> <br />techniques for 24 sites in the Arkansas River Basin where IS or more paired measurements were available. A list- <br /> <br />ing of the sites, regression coefficients, and various statistical qualifiers can be found in table 2. All regressions <br /> <br />were significant at the 95th percent confidence level. <br /> <br />Table 2 near bere. Regression equations for total dissolved solids and specific conductance <br />for selected sites in the Arkansas River Basin, April 1990-March 1993 <br /> <br />:~..'. ~f.\t;~l.~ ~~!~.~~:~~1;~~. i\~~<~ l. <br /> <br />;:~~~ !~; ~;:~~. <br />~ ..~......;.. ,I <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />S:Jbiect tc ~{svis~cn <br />50 NOT QUOTE OR RELEASE <br />l'0nding Approval by Dircc~cr, <br />U.S. Geolopkcl Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.