Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />f\028W1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MISSOURI BkSIN INTER-AG~~CY CO~n1ITTEE <br />lZ8th Hoeting <br />Colorado Springs, Colorado <br /> <br />"LAND EASEHENTS FOR RECREATION" - - - _ _ <br /> <br />George T. O'Malley, Jr. <br /> <br />An Easement is a limited right over land owned by somebody else. <br /> <br />Obtaining land for outdoor recreation purposes, acquiring the land <br />in fee simple, i. 0., in full ownership and retaining it in public <br />ownership for public use, ",i_ll necessarily remain the basic method for <br />developing outdoor recreation resources. The possibility of protecting <br />open space by public acquisition of some type of legal interest in land <br />which is less than a fee interest, has attracted substantial interest in <br />recent years. <br /> <br />There are various ways in which the rights involved in ownership of <br />land may be divided between private land owners and public agencies with <br />certain rights allocated to each. The principal advantages of obtaining <br />rights less than a fee are, first, under such an arrangement the land is <br />left in private ownership, normally continuing with the existing long- <br />term land use. The land thus remains in productive use without either <br />requiring considerable public maintenance or becoming scraggly. Second, <br />the land remains on the local tax rolls, although at a reduced valuation. <br />Third, in some situations the acquisition of oasement rights may be sub- <br />stantially cheaper than acquisition of the fee. Several kinds of tra- <br />ditional legal interests in land, loss than a fee, might be invoked--- <br />easements, leaseholds, licenses, licenses coupled with an interest, <br />covenants---and new variations and types of property interests are con- <br />stantly being created. <br /> <br />We have two types of situationo invo]~ing acquisition of land for <br />reoreational use. Those involving rights that do not include a public <br />right of entry and those that do. If the easements rights do not include <br />a public right of entry, the areas may still qualify as outdoor recreation <br />resources in certain types of situations, but the problems are quite <br />different, legally and practicaHy. <br /> <br />Decisions on acquisition of open areas for recreation should be made <br />within a planning framework for deciding between open recreation areas and <br />other competing demands for land. Such plans should set forth not only <br />the total amount needed but the criteria for its selection and location, <br />and the locations proposed for recreation open space, but the type of open <br />space area which is appropriate in each instance;, i. e., park, wilderness, <br />scenic areas, etc. <br /> <br />The planning policy should also take into account all sorts of <br />problems on the interrelationship between open areas and other land uses. <br />Situations will arise where immedi.ate action is needed to preserve specific <br />open areas from development long before any general planning framework is <br />available. In such a situation, acquisition in fee or by easement may be <br />justified as a holding operation pending the preparation of a plan. The <br />