My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12076
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:48 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:22:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.B
Description
Upper Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1991
Author
Paul Upsons
Title
A Leader and Antagonist: Historical Forces Leading to Colorado's Influnce in Meeting Five of the Upper Colorado River Compact Commission (Honors Thesis for U. of Denver History Dept)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />florescence", in \fhich the federal government begiln to assume the leadership <br /> <br /> <br />in supplying the capital and technical expertise to eA~and the number and size <br /> <br /> <br />of western \fater projects. Corporate entities also began to emerge as dealers <br /> <br /> <br />of water to irrigators. The third stage, that of "empire", saw a more complete <br /> <br />mergir,g of government and private wealth to complete the harnessing of \festern <br /> <br />rivers. Worster claims that this period began in the 19~O's and is still in effect <br />tOday.? It is the second period of florescence, hO\fever, that is most relevant <br />to a discussion leading up to the Colorado River Compact of 1922 and subsequently <br />to the Upper Basin Compact of 1948. <br />One of the key 'lOrds of the late nineteenth and early t\fentieth century <br />vith Roosevelt as President "as "conservation". Today, \fith the legacy of the <br /> <br />environmental movement of the 1960's still intact, conserviltion to most people <br /> <br />means the preservation of nature against the destructive forces of development. <br /> <br />Yet in the Progressive Era of the United States the ,wrd had a different connotation <br /> <br />\fhich contradicts its current meaning to a certain degree. <br /> <br />Teddy Roosevelt, under whose leadership conservation became part of the national <br /> <br />agenda, was one of the first national leaders in America to \farn that America's <br />natural resources were not inexhaustible and to ma],e resource depletion a national <br />concern. He saw that the future of the nation depended upon the preservation <br />and far-sighted management of these resources.8 As a Progressive and ardent trust- <br /> <br /> <br />buster Roosevelt. naturally opposed the great business monopolies of the time; this <br /> <br /> <br />opposition carried over into his view that "natural resources must be used for the <br /> <br /> <br />benefit of all our people, and not monopolized for the benefit of the few.,,9 The <br /> <br />original purpose of the Reclamation Act was, after all, to provide small allotments <br /> <br /> <br />of land to families upon which to settle and ma~ce productive. The monopolization <br /> <br /> <br />to "hich Roosevelt rE,ferred most likely meant the actions of the "land grabbers"lO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.