Laserfiche WebLink
<br />."~~ <br />''',' <br />') <br />::; <br /> C.J <br />"-'.' (-, <br />.)! <br /><~ ('.J <br />.' , , <br /> " <br />,.... w <br />" <br />'. ,.p.. <br />.'l~ <br />,. <br />, <br /> <br />',,' <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />,', <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />:~ \ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Table 3. <br /> <br />Number of Floy tagged channel catfish (ICTPUN) and common carp <br />(CYPCAR) captured and recaptured in the San Juan River by year, <br />1992-1997. <br /> <br /> Tagged Recaptured % Recaptured <br /> ICTPUN CYPCAR ICTPUN CYPCAR ICTPUN CYPCAR <br />1992 1,677 694 32 II 1.9 1.6 <br />1993 752 1,001 53 79 2.2 4,7 <br />1994 341 287 42 64 1.5 3,2 <br />1995 624 667 37 86 l.I 3,2 <br />1996 479 380 33 45 0.9 1.5 <br />1997 5 5 26 42 0.7 1.4 <br />Total 3,878 3,034 223 327 5.8 10.8 <br /> <br />Although the number of captures to recaptures between successive seasons was low, there <br />did appear to be some relation between channel catfIsh movement and flow. Channel catfish <br />tagged in fall and recaptured in spring (prior to runoff: mean flows near 1,200 cfs) had a <br />higher frequency of recapture within the same river mile (86%; 6 of 7) than fish recaptured in <br />spring when mean flows were ~ 3,000 cfs (35%; 8 of 23). Conversely, channel catfish <br />tagged in spring when mean flows were >- 5,000 cfs and recaptured in fall had a low <br />frequency of recapture within the same river mile of 14% (12 of 14). In addition, 3 of 3 <br />channel catfish tagged in April and recaptured in May 1993 at flows >- 6,000 cfs had moved <br />downstream 5.3 to 7.1 river miles (x = 6.5). Mean distance moved did not appear to be <br />related to flow. However, the three furthest distances moved between successive seasons <br />occurred between fall 1995 and spring 1996 following the winter test flows when all three <br />fish moved downstream (49, 72, and 83 river miles; x= 68), There did not appear to be any <br />relation between common carp movement and flow. <br /> <br />Between 1992 and 1997 three channel catfish were captured four times and ten were captured <br />three times, Of the three captured on four occasions: one was captured all four times within <br />the same river mile (3-year span; 490-550 mm TL), another was captured within a 3-mile <br />section of river (2-year span; 422-470 mm TL), and one was captured in a 66-mile section of <br />river (3-year span; 448-519 rom TL). The latter was collected twice in a 2-mile section of <br />river in 1992 (4 month span), captured 64 miles downstream (2-year span), and captured a <br />fourth time (7 months later) within the same downstream river mile. These movements are <br />similar to those observed for all channel catfish collectively recaptured from 1992-1997, <br />There did not appear to be any ontogenetic relation with movement, though only eight fish <br />tagged -<300 mm TL were recaptured (4 of 8 recaptured in same or adjacent river mile), <br /> <br />San Juan River Non-native Species Interactions, Final Repon, I February 2000 <br /> <br />19 <br />