Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. STATE/REGIONAL FUTURE--MODIFIED CENTRAL CASE COMPARISON <br /> <br />The following paragraphs discuss the significant differences between <br />the State/Regional Future (SRF) estimates and the modified central case (MCC) <br />estimar~s. The SRF estimates displayed herein were furnished by the 10 basin <br />states-1. Each state has its own unique procedures for developing current <br />estimates and projections for socio-economic characteristics, land use and <br />water use. The procedures, assumptions and methodologies are far too complex <br />to attempt to present them in this report and would be different for each <br />state, The modified central case procedure, assumptions and methodologies are <br />generally described in the preceding section. With few exceptions, MCC water <br />needs are predicated on a set of national goals and from a national perspective <br />rather than from the regional viewpoint. <br /> <br />Socio-Economic <br /> <br />The Missouri basin states' estimates of current and projected population <br />and economic growth are somewhat higher than those displayed in the OBERS <br />Series E estimates, which are the basis of the modified central case estimates. <br />These differences are shown in Table Series COMP-l. <br /> <br />Differences in estimates of population start in 1975 with the SRF being <br />about 232,400 higher than the OBERS. This difference increases to about <br />1,716,000 for the year 2000. It is interesting to note that the OBERS projec- <br />tions forecast a population decline in ASA's 1004 (Yellowstone) and 1005 <br />(Western Dakotas), although development of the extensive coal fields is already <br />attracting a number of people to the area. The SRF also estimates a greater <br />total employment for the region as well as a significantly higher emp1oyment/ <br />population ratio. On the other hand, SRF annual per capita income for 1975 is <br />estimated to be about $600 lower than the OBERS but for 2000 is forecast to be <br />some $200 higher. <br /> <br />Agricultural Land Use <br /> <br />For the region, the SRF shows a 1975 estimate of about 90.5 million <br />acres of non-irrigated cropland; whereas, the MCC shows 106,4 million acres. <br />The SRF shows a slight increase in this category by 2000, and the MCC shows a <br />decline of about 25.3 million acres. For irrigated lands, the SRF projects an <br />increase from 11.5 million acres in 1975 to 17.4 million acres by 2000. These <br />estimates contrast to those shown for the MCC of 7.9 million acres in 1975 and <br />9.6 million acres in 2000. The SRF estimates are considerably above the MCC <br />estimates for all ASA's except 1007 (North-South Platte), where the MCC estimate <br />is 100,000 acres above the SRF estimate; however, the SRF projects about a 10 <br />percent increase in irrigated acres by 2000 and the MCC projects a decrease of <br />about 330,000 acres, or a 15 percent decline. For 1975, the greatest numerical <br />differences occur in ASA 1010 (Kansas) and ASA 1008 (Platte-Niobrara) where <br />differences are 1,414,600 acres and 795,000 acres, respectively. The SRF also <br />projects these two ASA's to show the largest numerical increases in irrigated <br />acreages. The MCC projected increase for 2000 for ASA 1010 is only about 15 <br />percent of the SRF forecast, and for ASA 1008 the MCC increase is about 37 <br />percent of the SRF. Since irrigation accounts for over 90 percent of the <br />total water used in the Missouri region, the large differences in current and <br />projected irrigation acreages are reflected in the corresponding water use <br />estimates throughout the basin. <br /> <br />11 It was agreed to use estimates of electric power production and related <br />water use furnished by the Federal Power Commission in the SRF. <br /> <br />III-12 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />