Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />002642 <br /> <br />Although several other factors besides precipitation commonly Influence <br />sediment yield, these either are associated with precipitation or are broadly <br />uniform throughout the Yampa River basin. The bedrock geology of the Yampa <br />River basin is principally Interbedded sandstone, mudstone, and shales. <br />Likewise, hillslope relief Is generally similar throughout the basin so that <br />neither of these factors can be primarily responsible for the observed <br />variations in sediment yields. Conversely, soil type and ground cover vary <br />In the. basin, but these factors are closely related to the distribution of <br />precipitation. Increasing ground cover and soil development as precipitation <br />Increases are primarily responsible for these decreases In sediment yield. <br />Thus, although the potential erosion by rainfall Increases eastward. in the <br />basin, increased soil development and ground cover more than compensate, so <br />that sediment yield decreases with increasing precipitation. <br /> <br />Large increases (from 60 to 500 percent) In coal mining In the Yampa <br />River basin are projected for the next 15 years. Most of this additional <br />coal production will be from surface mines. Even with the regulatory con- <br />trols of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Public Law <br />95-87), substantial quantities of additional sediment are estimated to be <br />eroded from the surface-mined areas and may be transported into the main-stem <br />Yampa River. <br /> <br />The potential Impact of surface mining would be the greatest In the <br />eastern part of the basin. Existing sediment yields are less than 100 <br />(tons/mi2)/yr or 35 (t/km2)/yr in this area, because of the extensive ground <br />cover and soil development. Rainfall Intensities are, however, greater in <br />the eastern part of the basin than In the western part. Consequently, one <br />can anticipate significantly greater sediment yields In the eastern part of <br />the basin from lands which have been disturbed by surface mining. <br /> <br />Estimated sediment yields from surface-mined lands were computed by the <br />PSIAC method. During mining and before complete reclamation, sediment yields <br />are likely to be 4,000 (tons/mI2)/yr or 1,400 (t/km2)/yr. Based on these <br />estimates and the projected ranges of volumes of mined coal, the total. amount <br />of additional sediment supplied to the Yampa River In 1990 due to surface <br />mining may be between 10,000 and 30,000 tons (9,ODO and 27,000 t) annually. <br /> <br />The significance of this additional sediment load within the basin <br />depends largely upon where the majority of the sediment enters the main-stem <br />Yampa River. Streams in the eastern part of the basin carry. relatIvely small <br />sediment loads under present conditions, and, hence, the additional sediment <br />yield from surface-mined land could have a considerable Impact. For example, <br />if all of the surface mining were located In areas of the Yampa River <br />subbasin upstream from Hayden, the additional sediment could increase the <br />annual load by as much as 30 percent, even though the amount of land <br />disturbed would be less than 3 percent. As the amount of surface mining <br />shifts to areas west of Hayden, the potential impact to the Yampa River <br />decreas.es in relative terms. Even at the greatest projected volume of coal <br />production, the additional sediment yields due to surface mining probably may <br />not increase the present sediment load carried by the Yampa River near <br />Maybell by more than an estimated 7 percent. <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />,. <br />