My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12053
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
12/1/1978
Author
USGS
Title
Present and Potential Sediment Yields in the Yampa River Basin - Colorado and Wyoming - December 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />OO?63u <br /> <br />that shales are more common in the Cretaceous units and mudstones are more <br />common in the Tertiary units. The Tertiary and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks <br />1 ie in a broad synclinal basin, the axis of which strikes northwest. <br /> <br />In the extreme western part of the basin, Paleozoic sedimentary rocks, <br />primarily 1 imestone, sandstone, and siltstone, are exposed on the land <br />surface. These rocks are well Indurated and are relatively resistant to ero- <br />sion compared to the younger sediments. Precambrian gneiss and schist out- <br />crop along the eastern fringe of the Yampa River basin (fig. 6). These rocks <br />also are relatively resistant to erosion compared to the Tertiary and Creta- <br />ceous sedimentary rocks. <br /> <br />The interbedded sandstones, mudstones, and shales shown in figure 6 and <br />described above are relatively erodible. They crop out widely throughout the <br />basin, in areas of both relatively large and small sediment yield. <br />Therefore, the observed distribution of sediment yields cannot be entirely <br />due to similarities or differences in the bedrock geology. <br /> <br />Mean-Annual Precipitation <br /> <br />In many areas, sediment yields are closely correlated with mean-annual <br />precipitation. Although mean"annual precipitation alone is but one of the <br />important factors controlling sediment yields, many of the other factors, <br />such as vegetation, soil-type and cl imate, are related to precipitation. <br />Langbein and Schumm (1958) developed a general relation between sediment <br />yield and mean-annual precipitation (fig. 7). The most significant feature <br />of this relation for the present discussion is that maximum sediment yields <br />may be expected from watersheds with a mean-annual precipitation of about <br />12 inches (305 mm) per year. The peak in the sediment-yield curve at an <br />Intermediate level of precipitation is partly explained by the generalized <br />vegetation profile shown at the top of the graph (fig. 7). With increases <br />in mean-annual precipitation, tne vegetative cover becomes progressively <br />thicker and more diverse. As a result, the potential erodibll ity decreases <br />because the soil Is protected from intense rainfall, the soil particles are <br />bound together more firmly, and the soil profile is generally more permeable. <br />Thus, the decrease in sediment yield for a watershed which receives greater <br />than 12 inches (305 mm) of mean-annual precipitation is primarily due to <br />increased vegetative cover and development of a soil profile. <br /> <br />If mean-annual precipitation Is less than 12 Inches (305 mm), sediment <br />yields are limited by the available runoff. Thus, although potential <br />erodibility probably Increases continually as precipitation decreases, the <br />runoff is insufficient to transport the available supply of sediment. <br /> <br />The areal distribution of mean-annual precipitation in the Yampa River <br />basin is shown on figure 8. The 12-lnch (305-mm) per year line is of parti- <br />cular interest, because the greatest sediment yields might be expected from <br />areas near this line. About 40 percent of the Yampa River basin receives <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.