Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UENVERANDTHEWEsrl" <br /> <br />SECTION B .. <br /> <br />lilJm <br /> <br />o n 1 i n e <br />www.denverpost.com <br /> <br />TilE DENVER POST <br /> <br />Impasse imperils water' supply <br /> <br />By Susan Greene <br />DE!nver Post Staff Wrtl!!f <br /> <br />versions is necessary to ensure the health <br />oC the species. <br />"Someone's got to put the fish firsl;' <br />said John Hamill, Fish and Wildlife's as!o. <br />date manager for Colorado. <br />Environmentalists support Cederal inter- <br />vention partly on philosophical grounds - <br />a belief that humans have a responsibility <br />to protect biodiversity, to preserve all <br />. creatures. <br />"It's a concept of stewardship. It's a <br />question of what kind of relationship to n~- <br />Please see WATER on 98 <br /> <br />State, feds divided over endangered fish <br /> <br />Talks have broken down between Colo- <br />rado and the Cederal government over the <br />fate of four endangered fish species, leav- <br />ing Washington poised to impose a plan. <br />that local water officials fear will jeopar- <br />dize metro Denver's water supply. <br /> <br />Having rejected paris of a state strategy <br />to protect the fish in May, the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service is expected this sum- <br />mer to use the broad powers of the Endan- <br />gered Species Act to restrict how much <br /> <br />Monday, June 29, 1998 <br /> <br />Colorado River water can be tapped for <br />futp.re use. I. . . . <br />. The federal plan could send water agen- <br />cies throughout Colorado scrambling to <br />snag the limited river supply, which is a <br />fraction of what they say is needed to sup- <br />ply growth over the coming decades. <br />It also could force Denver and several of <br />its suburbs to rely on groundwater or other <br />more precarious sources, making develop- <br /> <br />ment considerably more expensive, local . <br />officials say_ <br />"We clm no'longer depend on the future <br />supplies we have counted on," said Chips <br />Barry, manager of the Denver Water De- <br />partment., "People don't understand that a <br />policy designed to preserve owls' and polar <br />bears may shul off the flows to their fau- <br />cets." . <br />Federal officials say limiting river di- <br /> <br />THE DENVER POST <br /> <br />State-federal impasse threatens metro water supply <br /> <br />WATER from Page 18 <br />'Iure we wallt to have," said Dall <br />.Luecke, Rocky Mountain regioual <br />director for the Euvironmental De- <br />fen$eFund."Wecannolongeracl <br />in utler disregard for our impacl <br />on these fish and other species that <br />inhabit the Earth." <br />The debate center$ on e{{ort~ to <br />safeguard the Colorado squawfish, <br />.Immphackchub,bonytailchubaud <br />.razorback sucker. Known among <br />many fishermen as "trash fish," <br />tho~e l'pecies intentionally were <br />poisoned in the 1960s by the Fish <br />and Wildlife Service. <br />That agency uow is restoring the <br />fish under the Endangered Species <br />Act - a wide-reaching law that, <br />when necessary, put~ wildlife be. <br />fore people or eCi:lDomics. The lcg- <br />i~lation is pl.'rhaps best known for <br />the controversy it triggcred in the <br />Pacific Northwest, where it pro- <br />tected the 5potted owl at the ex- <br />pl:'1I5e of logging companies and <br />their workers. <br />Fish and Wildlife aims to restore <br />the four specie5 parUy by keeping <br />water levels high in a streteh of the <br />Colorado Riv",r near Grand Junc- <br />tion called the l!i.Mile Reach. <br />That's downstream from where <br /> <br />The 15.Mile Reach <br />The section 01 the Colorado River know as the 15-Mije Reach is home 10 lout <br />endangeredli5hspecies. <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />mi~ <br /> <br />i. <br />BI~ <br />:)i~ <br />! <br /> <br />TheDenvetPosl' <br /> <br />Denver draws water into its sys- <br />tem before sending it through <br />dams and tunnels to storage reser- <br />voirs on the Front Range. <br />InkeepillgwithaWeslerntradi- <br />tion that water rights be handled <br />on the state level, Washington in <br />the 1980sbegan relying on the <br />stale to restore the fish. Officials <br />with the state department of natu- <br />ralresourceshavespentthepast <br />decade tr)"ing to strike the difficult <br /> <br />balance of maintaining enough <br />flow luthe IS-Mile Reach to pro- <br />tectthespeciesandsecuringwhat <br />many water users see as their God- <br />given right to continue drawing <br />from the river. <br />After years of public meetings, <br />environmental studle5 and5top- <br />and-start negotiations, the state de- <br />vised a strategy In 1995 to achieve <br />those goals. Under that proposal, <br />water districts throughout Colora- <br /> <br />do would have access to 400,000 <br />acre-feet of river water annually <br />above 1995 consumption levels. <br />One acre-foot roughly serves a <br />family of four for one year. But <br />federal wildlife officials have just <br />rejected that plan..s.aying it didn't <br />leave enongh water for the fisb. <br />"We were relying on the state to <br />provide protection," Hamill said. <br />"And It's just become painflllly ob- <br />vious there's not the political will <br />to do that.H <br />State Natural Resources otri- <br />cials say they based their plan on <br />state water law, which allows pro- <br />tection for the species only if those <br />efforts don't hinder water agen- <br />cies'ability to draw on their water <br />rigbtsfordevelopment. <br />"We canoot. we will not, put the <br />needs of fish ahead of the needs of <br />people,H said Peter Evans, acllng <br /> <br />director of the state's Water Con- <br />servationBoard. <br />Eric Kuhn, manager of the Colo- <br />rado River Water Conservation <br />District. said "the feds were led <br />down a primrose path thinking <br />they cOllld rely on 5tate water law <br />to settle this." He described the re. <br />latiOllshipbetween state and feder- <br />al wildlife offidals on I!le issue as <br />"a shotgun marriage that just sort <br />of broke up." <br />In response, Fish and Wildlife is <br />elpecledsoon to limit the thou- <br />s.andsof Colorado water users de- <br />pendent on the river to drawing on- <br />Iy 60,000 acre-feet in additional <br />supplies annually. <br />Once that water is in use, .....ater <br />agencies might be allowed to draw <br />anolher60,OOOacre-feet-buton- <br />Iyifa series of cltensive biological <br />studies shows the fi~h are rebound. <br /> <br />ing. Fish ami Wild1ifeof.ficials Iltc <br />quick tonolc that only I'.he initial <br />60.000 acre.fe!!! would bl~ guaran- <br />teedandthattheS('condincrement <br />islentath'eatbest. <br />The plan, if Implementc d, w01l1l1 <br />trump state walcrrights--a rinl'- <br />Iy tuned legal system lhat ha~, ~t <br />leastunti1now,ptcvailedthrol1gh- <br />out the history of the We~t <br />It likely would meet ('ppositioll <br />from the Denver Water Depart- <br />ment,Colorado'smo~tpo\"'erfullo. <br />cal water agency. Thed<'l'at,tment <br />rears it will lose full ac('e~s I" <br />60000 acre.f('{'t of riyerwaler 1<, <br />whiehilhasllada I('galright:'!hw~ <br />the 1920sand 1930s.^gencyc:rc\\'s <br />already arc tapping SO!lle' of Ih~t <br />water and say th<,y wiil n('ed Ihe <br />full amount (Wl:'r the next derluln <br />to serVl'new clen'll1l'ment in Ull'ir <br />154.mileservlcearea. <br /> <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />*-\ <br />~ t <br />f)'~ <br />1: <br />