WSP12043 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2918 vi questions to representatives of the Colorado .Iater Conservation Board or to repre- sentatives of the Bureau of Heclamation. " ~t Morgan ideeting. - Approximately 38 questions were presented at this ~eeting, most of which were addressed to J. H. Knights, w~o was assistec by J. C. Douglass, Bureau ~lanning ~ngineer. Quite frequently ans"ers by Bureau representa- tives were ~upplemented by R. J. Tipton or Judge Stone. rractic~lly all questions submitted at this meeting implied objection to the Narrows Dam and could be divided generally into four cateeories: (1) Has full consiGeration been given to the possibility of controlling floods above the mouth of Bijou Creek and have studies been made of the possibilities for use of such water in the recharge of ground- 'water 'aquifers? (2) What policy and methods of procedure will be followed by the Bureau of rtecl~aation in appraisal and acquisition of right-of-way for the reservoir and existing water rights? (J) '"hat procedures vlill be followed in acquiring water rights for Harrows? (4) What affect will removal of reservoir property from the tax rolls have on the revenue of '"organ County? A large group of persons attending the meeting was interested in the con- struction of a dam or dams on upstream tributaries of the bouth L'latte itiver, par- ticularly on Bijou Creek, which would make the water available for use farther up- stream. Individuals raising questions concerning control of floods in the upper reaches of Bijou Creek and the possibility of subsequent recharge of Q~dergroUnd aquifers included ]:;rnest roosener, lieil Rosener, .:leth Harshman, James Jo:. \iorth, and Richard B. r'1Wnter. Many property O~lers in the area to be inundated by the reservoir were in attendance at this meeting and the 14 or 15 questior? ~sked pertained primarily to the Bureau's policy and procedures in acquiring 5'IC: _.."'ol;erty. Concern was expres- sed relative to whetl\er compensation for the pro!XI'\- ,;odd be consistent with prevailing prices, the length of time that vmuld e=-apRe -oetl'ieen Government appraisaJ and purchase of the propert7 and the receipt of pa:-mer.t tLerefor, how values for businesses in Orchard and "'eldona wo'lid be determined" and the appraisal pro- cedure to be followed in acquiring lands na~ leased ny oil companies from farmers on an annual casis for oil exploration purposes. Questions concerning rightful reimbllPSement to property owners in the f'loOOed area for intrinsic and sentimental property values 'Lere submitted by '"arvin J>tchison, George A. ]:;pperson, j',ir. and '"rs. R. J. Lamborn, J. Corder ~mith, Mrs. J. 1. 100se, and Pete Brunelli. The policy to be followed by the Bureau of Reclamation in the appraisal and value of water rights to be acquired in the "'eldon Valley Canal and the procedure t, be followed in the utilization and disposal of such ,rights were questioned, and concern was expressed that rights for this reservoir V,1) uld be adjudicated in Federal Courts rather than t>tate Court's. Current practices of the Department of Justice were cited as the basis for these fears. Assurance was given that all wat- ers accruing to this reservoir would be administered in accordance .tith ~tate water right laws. Questions on water rights were raised by George EpFerson as represent- ative of many ditch companies in Colorado t>tate ~'ater District No.1.