Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-. <br />I <br />1 0> <br />0 <br />, f'"" <br /> (j) <br />..., .\ <br />j -.. <br />0 <br />1 <br />'. <br />] <br />J <br />] <br />f] <br />.. <br />TI <br />J <br />1 <br />'f <br />] <br />'.j <br />.., <br />., <br />J <br />'! <br />.i <br />_J <br /> <br />TABLE 3.4 <br /> <br />PROJECTS/FACILITIES INCLUDED IN <br />MODERATE AND HIGH-FUTURE-LEVEL USE SCENARIOS <br /> <br />PROJECT RIVER AVE. DEPLETION (1000 atlvr) 1) <br />OR OR MOD. FUT. HIGH FUT. ASSUMED ANNUAL <br />FACILITY CREEK LEVEL LEVEL DEMAND PATTERN <br />Homestake Project <br />Homestake II Eagle 21 21 Constant <br />Eagle-Arkansas Eagle 0 .6 Constant <br />Continental-Hoosier Blue 0 6 Constant <br />Pueblo/Eagle Systems 2) Eagle 0 3 Constant <br />Ruedi Res. Marketing Fryingpan 3 40 Variable <br />Rock Creek Reservoir Rock 13 13 Constant <br />Indian Creek Res. Eagle 1 1 Constant <br />West Divide Project Divide 0 25 Variable <br />Red Cliff Project Eagle 0 25 Constant <br />Oil Shale Projects 2) Colorado & 0 93 Variable <br /> Main Elk <br />TOTAL 38 233 <br /> <br />1) Numbers represent average annual depletions, not project yields. <br /> <br />2) Assumes that the increased demands by oil shale projects are 3000 at/yr under the Moderate <br />Future-Use Scenario and are supplied by Ruedi Reservoir Marketing Program. Under the <br />High Future-Use Scenario, increased oil shale demand would be 133,000 at/yr, ot which <br />40,000 af/yr are supplied by the Ruedi Reservoir Marketing Program. <br /> <br />3-13 <br />