|
<br />
<br />not sogre;l;J;.,; however ,and the nUlllber ,of units affected was fewer. A
<br />canvass,';g.'., the ,damage ell-Used )Jy thi~. ~loodrevealedthat its recurrence
<br />at 'th.e ~l;'es~nt"time waul\! caUf/e estimated damages of $40,000, of which
<br />$26,690,'wq1ild,.be: direct~ and$i:3,400 would be indirect. Details of
<br />these'Ciamages are shown'in table 2~ .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />'''f
<br />
<br />TAB:(.,Et ~
<br />
<br />" ",
<br />
<br />". -'
<br />. .
<br />. . I .
<br />~ST1MATED DAMAGES. THi.T vwum RE'SULT . FROM RECtlR;RENCE
<br />OF FLOODS' OF 14 JU!X i 1948 AND 2, JULY 1990
<br />
<br />Item
<br />
<br />Damages
<br />14 July 1945 25 Julr 19>0
<br />
<br />DmECT DM1I.GES
<br />
<br />Residential property
<br />Business property
<br />Churches
<br />Transportation facilities:
<br />Railroads. .
<br />City streets and bridges
<br />Utilities
<br />
<br />'. ~)17,200 $9,700
<br />.,' 19 ;8,00 11,400
<br /> 700 ,00
<br />, 2,$00 1,$Oq ..
<br /> ).,000 2 000'
<br /> ,..
<br /> 2,000 1,506
<br />;)45,200 ~~26,600
<br />. 23,800 ' 13,400
<br />(\>69,000 $40,000
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Total Direct Damages
<br />nmmECT DI,Mr.GES" ,.i:.
<br />"Tot~;L Dlune.g~s'
<br />" ",', .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />3-06. Average SnnuaJ.' damages. - The'estimates of'damage that would
<br />be ca1lSed by a recUrrence of the 1948 and ,1950 floods were used in con-
<br />j1.!llction with otl:1,er qata gathereddurplg thefi,Sldinvestigat4.onto
<br />establish a disQllarge+damage relation~ This relation waS then 1lSed to
<br />eetilnate the damages, tbat,cou+d be expected fr6ma'repetition of the
<br />o1jher floods which 'Si;udies and interviews indicate have' occurred during
<br />the 34-year period (1918-1951). Average annual damages were then com-
<br />putedby dividing the total damages that, would reeult from a repetition
<br />of the floods of record by the, munber ?f yee,rsin the ~eriod.' The to~al
<br />damage that would be. caused by a reIJetJ.tion oi',the floods Of record,
<br />amounts to {)216,900~ I;>r $6,380 annually ,as shown in tableJ., .
<br />
<br />3-07. In addition to the,floods:truit"have occUrred duritlg:l}he
<br />period of record it ~s assUmeq that the . etandard, project flood whfch
<br />would have an estima~d' !lea)l:d~~chai:ll~of: ~,2$Ocubic ~ee~ per second
<br />at Willow Street would oCcur,once,d~ing ,the life of ,'j;hepr.oject, or
<br />$0 years. This flood, 'ii'oUJ.d caUSe dSl1lagee estim~ted' at ~i~5;600, or
<br />. .. : ..1, .," '; "', ., '.'_' ,"'. .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.-4-
<br />
<br />Appendix In
<br />
|