Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />..* THE PUIUC RECORO ("ORPOAA TION <br />ALL alGHTS aESE'VEO <br /> <br />3.9.7 <br /> <br />~, <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />seR6. 6-S2 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE <br /> <br />A review of the water quality standard for salinity in the Colorado <br />River and the plan of implementation has been held in accordance with <br />the ~olorado Water Quality Control Act and the Clean Water Act. The <br />same water quality standard is adopted for salinity--the water charac- <br />teristics within the Colorado River basin in Colorado appropriate to <br />maintain the numeric levels established at the three downstream check- <br />points. The purpose of water quality standards is to protect the uses <br />of. the waters, The narrative criteria adopted by Colorado will ade- <br />quately protect the uses. It has been the consensus of EPA and the <br />Forum for some time that the numeric levels are appropriate. <br /> <br />The standard rests upon the dual considerations that salinity levels <br />shall be maintained in the lower Colorado River while the upper ba~in <br />states continue to develop their compact-apportioned share of theColo- <br />rado River, These were recognized as necessary companion considerations <br />even before the 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control <br />Act were adopted. See, for example, the Conclusions and Recommendations <br />of the Conferees at the Reconvened Seventh Session of the Conference in <br />the Matter of Pollution of the Interstate Waters of the Colorado River, <br />page 3 of Exhibit C to the 1975 Forum proposed Water Quality Standard <br />for Salinity and Plan of Implementation. The 1975 document was Exhibit <br />A at the hearing. <br /> <br />The points ehosen as appropriate for establishing numeric criteria are <br />three key locations in the lower mainstem. The 1975 document affords <br />a clear explanation for the choice of the three locations at pages 55 <br />and 56: <br /> <br />In order to provide for sound water quality 'objectives, <br />numeric criteria are to be established at three key <br />stations (i.e., below Hoover, below Parker and at <br />Imperial Dams). The State of Nevada diverts Colo- <br />rado River main stem water from Lake Mead for use in <br />the Las Vegas area, and the returns enter the lake <br />just upstream from Hoover Dam. The gaging station <br />below Parker Dam is immediately downstream of the <br />major Lake Havasu diversion for the Metropolitan <br />Water District of Southern California. Also, the <br />Central Arizona Project now under construction will <br />divert from Lake Havasu, The large agricultural <br />areas in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys in <br />California and Yuma area in California are served <br />by diversions at Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />This action repeals the May 1976 adoption of the "Water Quality Stan- <br />dards for Salinity Including Numeric Criteria and Plan of Implementa- <br />tion for Salinity Control, Colorado River System", dated June 1975 <br />and the "Supplement Including Modifications" to the above-referenced <br />document, August 26, 1975. <br /> <br />THE CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS <br /> <br />5 CCR 1002 - 10 <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />S <br />... ",-',~-;j <br />,'if-." <br />