Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ 0 'b:J I 8 <br /> <br />age2 <br /> <br />Opinion <br />The Key: Soil and Water <br /> <br />Gov, Bob Kerrey said it: Nebraska's soil and water wealth is the key to <br />Its future. It could be the most significant pronouncement of the new <br />governor's four-year term, <br />He was addressing the organizational meeting of Agriculture 2001- <br />itself an extraordinary entry in Nebraska's agenda for the future, <br />Calling for a renewed effort in soil and water management, Kerrey said: <br />"We have made great strides in Nebraska and we can be proud of our <br />commitment, but we need to move decisively and in unison to manage <br />the resource base from which spring our wealth and way of life," <br />Later, in a special news conference to express his views on natural <br />resources, Kerrey declared, "Improvements in our soil resources are <br />an investment in Nebraska's future, They are an investment in our <br />nation's security and our way of life," <br />Gov, Charles Thone, before him, proclaimed the need for develop- <br />ment of Nebraska's soil and water resources as the route to economic <br />progress for the entire state, He enlisted an impressive group of Ne- <br />braskans fo assist in this effort and in the corollary commitment to ex- <br />pand markets for the state's agricultural bounty. <br />If ever there were a truly bi-partisan. total-Nebraska mission. this is <br />it: It should be approached with support and enthusiasm that crosses <br />party, geographic and occupational lines. <br />The High Plains study, recently completed, asserts Nebraska's <br />opportunity: as water supplies diminish in states to the south of us, <br />Nebraska can at least double its irrigated acreage to make up for lost <br />production to the south and can bring in the associated processing <br />activity to create industrial employment: <br />Now a new study, just released, reinforces this blueprint for the <br />future. Commissioned by the state's Department of Economic Devel- <br />opment, the $100,000 report on Nebraska's opportunities for economic <br />growth was prepared by the prestigious Arthur D, Little firm, It cites the <br />state's prospects for industries based on soil and water resources and, <br />though probably not prominently enough displayed, it carries these <br />passages: <br />"Because of the availability of water for irrigation in Nebraska (and <br />the declining availability of water in the southern High Plains), sub- <br />stantial increases in corn production in Nebraska are expected to con- <br />tinue, Nebraska has also captured an increasing share of sorghums <br />and soybean production and this is likely to continue, <br />"Grain production, in turn, also influences the location of feedlots.... <br />As the cultivation of irrigated corn and sorghums declines in the South, <br />industry experts believe that fed cattle production is likely to shift back <br />toward the more traditional corn belt feeding areas.. <br />"If cattle feeding does shift to Nebraska over the next few years, <br />major meat packing operations could follow at some later date, In fact, <br />some meat packing companies have indicated that if they had to recon- <br />sider their recent invesfments in Texas and Kansas at this time, they <br />would more than likely be looking much more favorably at Nebraska <br />locations." <br />The authors recommend that Nebraska upgrade its industrial devel- <br />opment efforts targeted on the food processing and associated indus- <br />tries, a theme frequently advanced by Gov. Kerrey. <br />To further capitalize on grain production, the report also suggets a <br />'locus on special investment incentives, market subsidies (e,g., for <br />gasohol), and technology support." This obviously relates to expand- <br />ed utilization of grain as a substitute for petroleum in a broad range of <br />products, as stressed by Gov. Thone, <br />The Agriculture 2001 mission will spend the coming year studying <br />Nebraska's agriculture and natural resources into the future and then <br />,nake recommendations for the role and activities of the University of <br />Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. <br />At its January meeting, Chairman Jim Roberts of Lexington said the <br />exercise will identify the strengths and the problems of the state in <br />relation to its goals for the future and then propose solutions, <br />University Regent John Payne of Kearney said Agriculture 2001 has <br />it", potential to join those rare events and persons who have had major, <br />lasting impact on the University's development: It can be that kind of a <br />milestone. <br />In the same manner, the extension of this effort beyond the Univer- <br />,;rty and past the coming year, as advocated by Nebraska's present and <br />immediate past governors, can be an equally notable milestone for the <br />whole state, <br /> <br />l1esources Legislation <br /> <br />I here'II be plenty of big bills on re- <br />C:OII, ces, those regularly chronicled <br />h~1 the daily news media. <br />L.B 198, to give statutory recogni- <br />i.lDfl to groundwater recharge and <br />111"'" surface storage projects to <br />Closes; for recharged supplies, prob- <br />,:bly will be most far-reaching, It has <br />11 cll-introducers. <br />1'lost controversial likely will be <br />_"", Hoagland's LB381 giving <br />qfnuddwater preference to munici- <br />I,nl IIse above agricultural and <br />LB,,>J6 providing protection of in- <br />!ream flows, <br />I'~(jst interesting should be pro- <br />,'''sal by Public Works Chairman <br />I ,jean Schmit to allocate 10% of <br />';",Ie neneral fund to soil and water <br />,o,k It's buried on page 40 of <br />Scllndt's extensive revision of state <br />rtj\l,~nlJe-sharjng but is sure to at- <br />rmd appropriate attention before <br />Jussiun's end, It's the only legisla- <br />11"(; entry specifically aimed at cre- <br />:li"U significant funding of soil and <br /> <br />water projects, <br />Then there'll be a passel of other <br />measures, many important in their <br />own right, that will tend to get lost in <br />day-to-day news shuffle, Among <br />them: <br />. LB379 defining "best manage, <br />ment practices" tor efficient use of <br />irrigation water. Term was intro- <br />duced in last year's LB375 setting up <br />groundwater management areas, <br />but wasn't defined. Bill makes such <br />practices whatever determined by <br />NRD board as "using the least <br />amount of groundwater practica- <br />ble" to raise crop; also reqUires such <br />practices be instituted as part of <br />management area if water table de- <br />clines by 2 1/2% of saturated thick- <br />ness over five years. <br />. LB247 requiring restoration of <br />native vegetation on soils subject to <br />soil erosion when land no longer is <br />cultivated; aimed at irrigation aban- <br />donment problem in Sandhi lis, <br />. LB236 adding "Soil" to Nebras- <br /> <br />Regional Resources <br /> <br />Water Project Differences <br /> <br />Missouri Basin Slales representa- <br />tives nathered in Denver last month <br />to compare notes on water planning <br />processes, part of Missouri Basin <br />States Association move toward im- <br />proved understanding basin-wide, <br />Nebraska presentation noted the <br />state's water planning process now <br />is at crossroads: pOlicy issue studies <br />initiated in 1978 beinn completed: <br />Legislature starting to consider <br />recommendations: new administra- <br />tion must determine its course in <br />coordination of interagency activi- <br />ties and emphasis it will put on water <br />prolect planning, <br />Presentation relates that Nebras, <br />ka "dramatically" altered its ap- <br />proach to state water planning in <br />1978 by changing Irom long range <br />basin,oriented "state water plan" to <br />flexible planning process initially <br />stressing short,term studies of spe' <br />cific water issues. <br />With this phase reaching fulfill- <br />ment-where do we go from here? <br /> <br />Navigation water needs in Missouri <br />River below Sioux City could be <br />treated as depletion of stream tlow <br />for purposes of water accounting <br />system being prepared by MBSA, <br />That was one idea advanced at the <br />Denver meeting. <br />Even thoug h navigation is not a <br />consumptive use of water. depletion <br />treatment would show how it allects <br />current demands and where con- <br />flicts over water use would start-so <br />goes the reasoning behind this <br />thesis, <br /> <br />Missouri Congressman Robert <br />Young reports generally favorable <br />response to his federal legislation <br />callinn for interstate compact for <br />Missouri Basin. But upstream inter- <br />ests remain skeptical of whnt Young <br />and his co,introducers, including <br />Rep, Douglas Bereuter of Nebraska, <br />will mclude in the bill; they'd rather <br />have it come from the states up than <br />from the Congress down. <br />Being advanced by some up' <br />stream interests as a simplified ap' <br />proach to the compact IS a plan <br />merely to set upper limit for amount <br />of water for transfer out of Missouri <br />Basin, based on accounting sys- <br />tem's finding of amount available for <br />that purpose, <br />That would allow any state to sell <br />Missouri River water out of the basin <br />until the agreed upon limit is <br />reached, This would not preclude <br />competition among states for out- <br />of-basin water customers; every <br />state for itself. <br />But it does bring the inter-basin <br />transfer issue into the compact <br />equation-which many close to the <br />situation view as vital. <br /> <br />InterNorth entry into the Energy <br />Transportation Systems Inc, (ETSI) <br />partnership could have profound ef- <br />fect on squabble over Missouri River <br />water for coal slurry pipeline, <br /> <br />ka Water Conservation Act. is aimed <br />at broadening soil conservation <br />practices possible with state sup- <br />port, making practices generally <br />square with federal work eligible for <br />funds, <br />. LB37 removing requirement that <br />elected members of Natural Re- <br />sources Commission be or have <br />been a director of a natural resourc- <br />es district. Intended to broaden <br />Commission membership beyond <br />farmers generally elected from <br />farmer-dominated NRD boards, <br />N RDs expected to oppose; Com- <br />mission split 8-8 in ellort to take <br />position, <br />. LB232 providing that NRD direc- <br />tors elected from subdivisions (as all <br />but one at'large director in each <br />district are) will be chosen only by <br />voters in that subdivision. They're <br />now elected by voters throughout <br />the district. <br /> <br />Indications are the consortium <br />might undergo some restructuring <br />With InterNorth, headquartered in <br />Omaha, assuminn a dominant role, <br />InterNorth's 29,5% of the partner- <br />ship, along with Kansas,Nebraska <br />Gas Co.'s 20% ownership, puts vir- <br />tually half the enterprise in hands of <br />potent Nebraska corporations, <br />Issue will reappear in Nebraska <br />Legislature this year, in LB559 to <br />permit coal slurry companies to <br />condemn rights'of-way owned by <br />other enterprises with eminent do- <br />main powers-namely railroads, <br />chief opponents of slurry piping, <br />It puts two Nebraska corporate <br />titans, InterNorth and Union Pacific. <br />on a collision course, Should make <br />for fascinating theater, but agoniz- <br />ing politics, <br /> <br />Federal court ruling saying EI Paso, <br />Tex., has right to cross state line to <br />pump water from New Mexico has <br />ominous signs for Nebraska and <br />other western states, says a leader <br />of New Mexican fight to repel Texas <br />water invaders. <br />Bill Saad, manager of Elephant <br />Butte Irrigation District at Las Cru- <br />ces, where more than 300 EI Paso <br />municipal wells would be drilled, <br />tells NRR the rulmg will be appealed <br />to circuit court in Denver; decision <br />expected before year's end, <br />Saad sees this as one more nail in <br />water collin at Western agricultur- <br />ists, <br />First, he says. was Nebraska's <br />Sporehase case, knocking out part <br />of the state's prohibition against <br />export ot water, Then the Vermejo <br />River case in which U,S, Supreme <br />Court ruled in December that Colo- <br />rado Fuel and Iron, rather than New <br />Mexico farmers, is entitled to 4,000 <br />acre feet of water from that river, <br />"Folks down here figure we're <br />gonna end up with a lot of rich law, <br />yers and dry farmers," Saad reports, <br /> <br />New Mexico decision recalls little- <br />noted warning late last year by <br />Vince Dreeszen, director of Univer- <br />sity of Nebraska Conservation and <br />Survey Division: "Where water is <br />available, somebody will be eyeing <br />it," <br />At Nebraska Stock Growers Asso- <br />ciation conference on Sandhills irri- <br />gation. Dreeszen predicted that <br />within 10 years Nebraska could face <br />plans for "massive water diversions <br />out of the Sandhills," Under those <br />grassy hills is probably the largest <br />body ot underground water in U.S, <br />-almost certain to draw interest <br />from water-short areas, Dreeszen <br />reasons. <br />These views were backed by Dave <br />Aiken, University water law special- <br />ist. <br />"It is just a matter of time before <br />people west of us look at the Sand- <br />hills to see how they can get some of <br />the water," he said, <br /> <br />A high level disagreement that could profoundly attect future water <br />plans in Nebraska is about to emerge from the technical drawing <br />boards to the policy'making tables, The points at issue could extend to <br />the divvying up of water among the MiSSOUri Basin states, <br />The question revolves around the degree to which pumping of <br />underground water near a stream depletes the flow in that stream, <br />Planners in the U,S. Bureau of Reclamation and the Nebraska <br />Natural Resources Commission see a significant link between these <br />actions, Nebraska's chief hydrological experts-Mike Jess. director of <br />the Department of Water Resources, and Vince Dreeszen, director of <br />the University of Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, and <br />their stalls-agree but see considerably less stream depletion from <br />groundwater pumping, <br />At stake are estimates of future water availability for projects pro- <br />posed to use water from the Platte and other major rivers passing <br />through areas of pump irrigation. <br />More imminent are figures to be used in the water accounting system <br />being assembled by the Missouri Basin States Association, Designed <br />to provide a computerized model of the Missouri Basin waters, which <br />includes all of Nebraska's flowing streams, its principal purpose will be <br />to assess future water availability throughout the basin, <br />It could be a factor in any inter,state compact allocating water <br />among the states-if projections ot stream flows in Nebraska show a <br />large amount of depletion because of pumping, this state could be <br />allotted less water than if the anticipated tlows were larger, <br />The MBSA report assumes a direct but time-dependent impact of <br />groundwater pumping within seven miles of the Platte resulting in <br />streamflow depletion, One attitude by Nebraska hydrologists is that <br />the MBSA study design selected finds "lots of depletion" and is not <br />based on actual experience, <br />One conclusion is that "any continuing support for this type of work, <br />either verbally or financially, can only be at the expense of truth and the <br />detriment ot Nebraska and other basin states," <br />If this difference of opinion is not resolved, credibility of the MBSA <br />accounting system could be jeopardized in Nebraska. <br />Meetings between the Nebraskans and representatives of the <br />Bureau and MBSA have brought a better understanding of each other's <br />views. Jess says, with neither side claiming absolute correctness, <br />Much of the disagreement stems from the MBSA's use of a fixed <br />formula as opposed to Dreeszen's contention that the depletion factor <br />varies from basin to basin and that "the Platte is a whole different <br />animaL" <br />Dreeszen says the argument for high depletion rates is based on <br />both the withdrawal of water by pumping and the evapo,transportation <br />effect of water escaping through densely-growing plants, <br />But he contends that the cultivated vegetation of today doesn't re- <br />lease any more water than the original grass in pre-settlement days and <br />that if pumping didn't keep the water table somewhat below the <br />surface, much of the underground water would be lost from <br />evaporation from the top levels of soil. <br /> <br />Future irrigation in the Cedar Yalley of central Nebraska is keenly <br />affected by the stream depletion controversy, A long'studied irrigation <br />project there is being discouraged by the Bureau of Reclamation which <br />feels pump irrigation has or will use too much of the flow of the Cedar <br />River, a tributary of the Loup. to support a surface project. <br /> <br />/--c <br /> <br />Dreeszen and Jess have advised project sponsors that "the Bureau's <br />forecast of future hydrologic conditions paints a far too gloomy <br />picture," <br />Such encouragement comes at a crucial time for backers of the <br />project. Authorization for the Cedar Valley Reclamation District <br />expires this year and must receive voter approval to be extended <br />another 15 years. Michael Shaughnessy of St. Paul, attorney for the <br />district. says this "critical" vote probably will be scheduled for late this <br />spring, <br /> <br />The Platte River's prospects as a source of additional irrigation activity <br />is a somewhat dillerent story. <br />In spite of his optimistic views on stream depletion, Jess doesn't <br />expect more than one more irrigation project to be built using Platte <br />flows above Columbus, His view, which is not shared by Dreeszen or <br />some Resources Commission planners, is based more on economic, <br />political and social factors than on water supply. <br />Present uncertainties about future availability of Platte water would <br />be magnified If one more project is built there, he reasons, This would <br />discourage the commitment of private or public funds for any addi- <br />tional projects and would heighten opposition from environmentalists, <br />municipalities and other competing water interests, he figures, <br />A half dozen separate project proposals counting on Platte water are <br />presently lined up, While avoiding any favoritism, Jess gauges the <br />proposals this way: <br />-The lillie Blue proposal for the Catherland project appears to be <br />turthest along with planning and feasibility studies, <br />- The Prairie Bend and Twin Valley proposals in Buffalo-Hall <br />Counties are currently in the spotlight trying to get federal feasibility <br />studies started. <br />-The Upper Big Blue proposal for irrigation in the York-Aurora <br />area-tied in with the Plum Creek reservoir envisioned by the Tri- <br />County Public Power and Irrigation District and the Whooping Crane <br />Trust which seeks water in the Platte in early spring on its way eastward <br />to the Upper Blue-probably has the broadest political backing. <br />-Proposals for the Enders project in southwestern Nebraska and <br />the Twin Plalle's use of a Perkins County water right for the Ogallala <br />area are farther behind in planning, <br /> <br />Federal Resources <br /> <br />Groundwater recharge will be back <br />in congressional spotlight this year, <br />with Nebraska Congressman Doug <br />Bereuter's reintroduction of legisla' <br />tion calling for demonstration pro, <br />jects across the West on how under- <br />ground water supplies can be re- <br />charged, <br />Bill also would add recharge to <br />benefits figured in Bureau of Recla' <br />mation projects, <br />Noting widespread support for <br />measure last year, Bereuter proba- <br />bly will abandon earlier plan to hold <br />hearings in Nebraska and other <br />western states. <br /> <br />"The Commissioner of Reclama- <br />tion (Roberl Broadbent) and other <br />noted water experts have assured <br />me that there is great need for this <br />legislation, All the testimony re- <br />ceived was favorable," Bereuter <br />says, <br />Only change in this yei:u's iJiit will <br />be to extend it to all western recla, <br />mation states, not just High Plains: <br />should widen support even more, <br />Bereuter reasons. <br />He tigures Nebraska, with excep- <br />tional capacity for groundwater re- <br />charge, will be principal beneficiary <br />from added recharge intelligence, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />'~ <br /> <br />----,--,-~----r;;, - <br />."1" " "" ". <, "I , <br />~ , ". r,,,;'\ <br />.... ,...;;." """ <br />j.. .~Jt': .~." <br />.,. YO:' <br /> <br />, <br />-c-----;--:..,~'--c,j.\ <br />, --:'--,. <br />.' ,'.... <br />" ,,'----, <br /> <br />['--".I'-~,:---.-.., <br />,"" I --..... <br />. Ie' .."",, ~ <br />.,I. ",."",~'.." I"'''' ~ <br />I . I"',,"'''~'-'I " \ \ <br />",I""i, <br />j" ! <br />.'') <br />-..., <br />> ~\ <br />) <br />\. <br />'.~ <br />(, <br />,(.;; <br />/' ~,::--......... '~1 .\: 1"'< <br />"~..' . ..' "'" ,,~ .\ -,( <br />;., .J" ':',.< '{1.) <br />. ~- ~ " <br />"., <br /> <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />...,/""","",.l' "u" <br />p.... '.,",1, ,~~'",.\ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />"::"" <br /> <br />,"".l\.'.IH.". <br /> <br />.", <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />~ ;")- <br />"_n <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />: ~ . <br />, ., <br />'"' <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />',';' <br /> <br />j' <br />I <br /> <br />'. ,', .]' <br />'.'\"'" ",'. <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />.~ <br />..., <br />~'" <br /> <br />Energy Resources <br /> <br />Determined effort to slow down <br />soaring prices of natural gas and <br />propane will be made by Legisla- <br />ture, but success wifl be elusive; <br />there's not much state lawmakers <br />can do, <br />Sen, Loran Schmit vows to make <br />this high priority item for Public <br />Works Committee, notes his own <br />experience in paying nearly three <br />times as much for propane last year <br />as in 1981. <br />"These energy costs will kill us if <br />we don't get them worked out." <br />Schmit asserts, <br />He sees promotion and possible <br />state support of alternate sources of <br />energy-solar, alcohol, wind. geo- <br />thermal-as one way to attack prob- <br />lem, <br /> <br />.1 <br />I <br />.1 <br /> <br />,- ,.-,-, ,.;" ~. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />'t\.. <br /> <br />" ~, <br /> <br />~ <br />~' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />." '. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />I." ~ 'H', I'''~ ~'''G, 8"5__'" <br /> <br />~ ", I.".:..~ ~ ,>. _'j <br />"', I ".. " <br />(, 1 I ..4~ '~.~. " I" <br /> <br />~ <br />- i ' <br /> <br />..".,:--",' .... <br />l.'.,"-' <br /> <br />'f.. <br /> <br />,,' <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />'''' '.... " '. ' <br />\,U'"" ". <br />. ,1) ..... ~ F, <br />l u '- "~" <br /> <br />'r'~ <br />- i' ~, <br /> <br />,,-? <br /> <br />OJ,, <br />,'~.' I< I', _," II <br />. 'II<~ \~..t 1'.':;,.\ <br />,e -1 <br />"",,',.~ ,'. <br />"",' ""'-,'" <br /> <br />~ I <br />"'I <br />" ) <br />'", '., \ <br /> <br />,~ <br /> <br />......~ <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />,.:.4 <br />~:~ ., <br />~ ..- ."'-' <br />, A,I '~.'.l <br /> <br />.. .;"", <br /> <br /> <br />~. ..... <br /> <br />I"'" . <br />~,": ,,' <br />," i.'" . <br />~ <br />,,,,, ,. <br /> <br />,I, , <br />...... ..~ <br /> <br /> <br />~ , ",.l '.1.., t,- <br />. "..", f-" <br />''','' " '\ <br />~ <br />t...., ~ < <br />l <br />'i <br />~, ~-~',,-..- .-,-'-\, <br /> <br />/3,:8", <br />'.';..It-AI,,," <br /> <br />....~ ',.1...' ",;, <br /> <br />. .. <br />., -\ <br />,,~..- <br />.. <br /> <br />-' '. ,~:-, <br /> <br />,] <br /> <br />. , <br /> <br />Possible Water Storage Sites <br /> <br />A total of 272 possible sites for water storage prolects In Nebraska are <br />identified on this map prepared by the University of Nebraska Conservation <br />and Survey Division, Of these sites for 1,000 acre feet or more of storage, 59 <br />have dams constructed or under construction: 213 not yet developed, A <br />small number of the undeveloped sites have been rejected by some agency, <br /> <br />Site locations were gathered from 30 local, state and federal agencies, The <br />map, with explanatory tables, will be part of a forthcoming policy issue <br />study on supplemental water supply in Nebraska to be published by the <br />Natural Resources Commission. <br />