<br />\ 0 'b:J I 8
<br />
<br />age2
<br />
<br />Opinion
<br />The Key: Soil and Water
<br />
<br />Gov, Bob Kerrey said it: Nebraska's soil and water wealth is the key to
<br />Its future. It could be the most significant pronouncement of the new
<br />governor's four-year term,
<br />He was addressing the organizational meeting of Agriculture 2001-
<br />itself an extraordinary entry in Nebraska's agenda for the future,
<br />Calling for a renewed effort in soil and water management, Kerrey said:
<br />"We have made great strides in Nebraska and we can be proud of our
<br />commitment, but we need to move decisively and in unison to manage
<br />the resource base from which spring our wealth and way of life,"
<br />Later, in a special news conference to express his views on natural
<br />resources, Kerrey declared, "Improvements in our soil resources are
<br />an investment in Nebraska's future, They are an investment in our
<br />nation's security and our way of life,"
<br />Gov, Charles Thone, before him, proclaimed the need for develop-
<br />ment of Nebraska's soil and water resources as the route to economic
<br />progress for the entire state, He enlisted an impressive group of Ne-
<br />braskans fo assist in this effort and in the corollary commitment to ex-
<br />pand markets for the state's agricultural bounty.
<br />If ever there were a truly bi-partisan. total-Nebraska mission. this is
<br />it: It should be approached with support and enthusiasm that crosses
<br />party, geographic and occupational lines.
<br />The High Plains study, recently completed, asserts Nebraska's
<br />opportunity: as water supplies diminish in states to the south of us,
<br />Nebraska can at least double its irrigated acreage to make up for lost
<br />production to the south and can bring in the associated processing
<br />activity to create industrial employment:
<br />Now a new study, just released, reinforces this blueprint for the
<br />future. Commissioned by the state's Department of Economic Devel-
<br />opment, the $100,000 report on Nebraska's opportunities for economic
<br />growth was prepared by the prestigious Arthur D, Little firm, It cites the
<br />state's prospects for industries based on soil and water resources and,
<br />though probably not prominently enough displayed, it carries these
<br />passages:
<br />"Because of the availability of water for irrigation in Nebraska (and
<br />the declining availability of water in the southern High Plains), sub-
<br />stantial increases in corn production in Nebraska are expected to con-
<br />tinue, Nebraska has also captured an increasing share of sorghums
<br />and soybean production and this is likely to continue,
<br />"Grain production, in turn, also influences the location of feedlots....
<br />As the cultivation of irrigated corn and sorghums declines in the South,
<br />industry experts believe that fed cattle production is likely to shift back
<br />toward the more traditional corn belt feeding areas..
<br />"If cattle feeding does shift to Nebraska over the next few years,
<br />major meat packing operations could follow at some later date, In fact,
<br />some meat packing companies have indicated that if they had to recon-
<br />sider their recent invesfments in Texas and Kansas at this time, they
<br />would more than likely be looking much more favorably at Nebraska
<br />locations."
<br />The authors recommend that Nebraska upgrade its industrial devel-
<br />opment efforts targeted on the food processing and associated indus-
<br />tries, a theme frequently advanced by Gov. Kerrey.
<br />To further capitalize on grain production, the report also suggets a
<br />'locus on special investment incentives, market subsidies (e,g., for
<br />gasohol), and technology support." This obviously relates to expand-
<br />ed utilization of grain as a substitute for petroleum in a broad range of
<br />products, as stressed by Gov. Thone,
<br />The Agriculture 2001 mission will spend the coming year studying
<br />Nebraska's agriculture and natural resources into the future and then
<br />,nake recommendations for the role and activities of the University of
<br />Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
<br />At its January meeting, Chairman Jim Roberts of Lexington said the
<br />exercise will identify the strengths and the problems of the state in
<br />relation to its goals for the future and then propose solutions,
<br />University Regent John Payne of Kearney said Agriculture 2001 has
<br />it", potential to join those rare events and persons who have had major,
<br />lasting impact on the University's development: It can be that kind of a
<br />milestone.
<br />In the same manner, the extension of this effort beyond the Univer-
<br />,;rty and past the coming year, as advocated by Nebraska's present and
<br />immediate past governors, can be an equally notable milestone for the
<br />whole state,
<br />
<br />l1esources Legislation
<br />
<br />I here'II be plenty of big bills on re-
<br />C:OII, ces, those regularly chronicled
<br />h~1 the daily news media.
<br />L.B 198, to give statutory recogni-
<br />i.lDfl to groundwater recharge and
<br />111"'" surface storage projects to
<br />Closes; for recharged supplies, prob-
<br />,:bly will be most far-reaching, It has
<br />11 cll-introducers.
<br />1'lost controversial likely will be
<br />_"", Hoagland's LB381 giving
<br />qfnuddwater preference to munici-
<br />I,nl IIse above agricultural and
<br />LB,,>J6 providing protection of in-
<br />!ream flows,
<br />I'~(jst interesting should be pro-
<br />,'''sal by Public Works Chairman
<br />I ,jean Schmit to allocate 10% of
<br />';",Ie neneral fund to soil and water
<br />,o,k It's buried on page 40 of
<br />Scllndt's extensive revision of state
<br />rtj\l,~nlJe-sharjng but is sure to at-
<br />rmd appropriate attention before
<br />Jussiun's end, It's the only legisla-
<br />11"(; entry specifically aimed at cre-
<br />:li"U significant funding of soil and
<br />
<br />water projects,
<br />Then there'll be a passel of other
<br />measures, many important in their
<br />own right, that will tend to get lost in
<br />day-to-day news shuffle, Among
<br />them:
<br />. LB379 defining "best manage,
<br />ment practices" tor efficient use of
<br />irrigation water. Term was intro-
<br />duced in last year's LB375 setting up
<br />groundwater management areas,
<br />but wasn't defined. Bill makes such
<br />practices whatever determined by
<br />NRD board as "using the least
<br />amount of groundwater practica-
<br />ble" to raise crop; also reqUires such
<br />practices be instituted as part of
<br />management area if water table de-
<br />clines by 2 1/2% of saturated thick-
<br />ness over five years.
<br />. LB247 requiring restoration of
<br />native vegetation on soils subject to
<br />soil erosion when land no longer is
<br />cultivated; aimed at irrigation aban-
<br />donment problem in Sandhi lis,
<br />. LB236 adding "Soil" to Nebras-
<br />
<br />Regional Resources
<br />
<br />Water Project Differences
<br />
<br />Missouri Basin Slales representa-
<br />tives nathered in Denver last month
<br />to compare notes on water planning
<br />processes, part of Missouri Basin
<br />States Association move toward im-
<br />proved understanding basin-wide,
<br />Nebraska presentation noted the
<br />state's water planning process now
<br />is at crossroads: pOlicy issue studies
<br />initiated in 1978 beinn completed:
<br />Legislature starting to consider
<br />recommendations: new administra-
<br />tion must determine its course in
<br />coordination of interagency activi-
<br />ties and emphasis it will put on water
<br />prolect planning,
<br />Presentation relates that Nebras,
<br />ka "dramatically" altered its ap-
<br />proach to state water planning in
<br />1978 by changing Irom long range
<br />basin,oriented "state water plan" to
<br />flexible planning process initially
<br />stressing short,term studies of spe'
<br />cific water issues.
<br />With this phase reaching fulfill-
<br />ment-where do we go from here?
<br />
<br />Navigation water needs in Missouri
<br />River below Sioux City could be
<br />treated as depletion of stream tlow
<br />for purposes of water accounting
<br />system being prepared by MBSA,
<br />That was one idea advanced at the
<br />Denver meeting.
<br />Even thoug h navigation is not a
<br />consumptive use of water. depletion
<br />treatment would show how it allects
<br />current demands and where con-
<br />flicts over water use would start-so
<br />goes the reasoning behind this
<br />thesis,
<br />
<br />Missouri Congressman Robert
<br />Young reports generally favorable
<br />response to his federal legislation
<br />callinn for interstate compact for
<br />Missouri Basin. But upstream inter-
<br />ests remain skeptical of whnt Young
<br />and his co,introducers, including
<br />Rep, Douglas Bereuter of Nebraska,
<br />will mclude in the bill; they'd rather
<br />have it come from the states up than
<br />from the Congress down.
<br />Being advanced by some up'
<br />stream interests as a simplified ap'
<br />proach to the compact IS a plan
<br />merely to set upper limit for amount
<br />of water for transfer out of Missouri
<br />Basin, based on accounting sys-
<br />tem's finding of amount available for
<br />that purpose,
<br />That would allow any state to sell
<br />Missouri River water out of the basin
<br />until the agreed upon limit is
<br />reached, This would not preclude
<br />competition among states for out-
<br />of-basin water customers; every
<br />state for itself.
<br />But it does bring the inter-basin
<br />transfer issue into the compact
<br />equation-which many close to the
<br />situation view as vital.
<br />
<br />InterNorth entry into the Energy
<br />Transportation Systems Inc, (ETSI)
<br />partnership could have profound ef-
<br />fect on squabble over Missouri River
<br />water for coal slurry pipeline,
<br />
<br />ka Water Conservation Act. is aimed
<br />at broadening soil conservation
<br />practices possible with state sup-
<br />port, making practices generally
<br />square with federal work eligible for
<br />funds,
<br />. LB37 removing requirement that
<br />elected members of Natural Re-
<br />sources Commission be or have
<br />been a director of a natural resourc-
<br />es district. Intended to broaden
<br />Commission membership beyond
<br />farmers generally elected from
<br />farmer-dominated NRD boards,
<br />N RDs expected to oppose; Com-
<br />mission split 8-8 in ellort to take
<br />position,
<br />. LB232 providing that NRD direc-
<br />tors elected from subdivisions (as all
<br />but one at'large director in each
<br />district are) will be chosen only by
<br />voters in that subdivision. They're
<br />now elected by voters throughout
<br />the district.
<br />
<br />Indications are the consortium
<br />might undergo some restructuring
<br />With InterNorth, headquartered in
<br />Omaha, assuminn a dominant role,
<br />InterNorth's 29,5% of the partner-
<br />ship, along with Kansas,Nebraska
<br />Gas Co.'s 20% ownership, puts vir-
<br />tually half the enterprise in hands of
<br />potent Nebraska corporations,
<br />Issue will reappear in Nebraska
<br />Legislature this year, in LB559 to
<br />permit coal slurry companies to
<br />condemn rights'of-way owned by
<br />other enterprises with eminent do-
<br />main powers-namely railroads,
<br />chief opponents of slurry piping,
<br />It puts two Nebraska corporate
<br />titans, InterNorth and Union Pacific.
<br />on a collision course, Should make
<br />for fascinating theater, but agoniz-
<br />ing politics,
<br />
<br />Federal court ruling saying EI Paso,
<br />Tex., has right to cross state line to
<br />pump water from New Mexico has
<br />ominous signs for Nebraska and
<br />other western states, says a leader
<br />of New Mexican fight to repel Texas
<br />water invaders.
<br />Bill Saad, manager of Elephant
<br />Butte Irrigation District at Las Cru-
<br />ces, where more than 300 EI Paso
<br />municipal wells would be drilled,
<br />tells NRR the rulmg will be appealed
<br />to circuit court in Denver; decision
<br />expected before year's end,
<br />Saad sees this as one more nail in
<br />water collin at Western agricultur-
<br />ists,
<br />First, he says. was Nebraska's
<br />Sporehase case, knocking out part
<br />of the state's prohibition against
<br />export ot water, Then the Vermejo
<br />River case in which U,S, Supreme
<br />Court ruled in December that Colo-
<br />rado Fuel and Iron, rather than New
<br />Mexico farmers, is entitled to 4,000
<br />acre feet of water from that river,
<br />"Folks down here figure we're
<br />gonna end up with a lot of rich law,
<br />yers and dry farmers," Saad reports,
<br />
<br />New Mexico decision recalls little-
<br />noted warning late last year by
<br />Vince Dreeszen, director of Univer-
<br />sity of Nebraska Conservation and
<br />Survey Division: "Where water is
<br />available, somebody will be eyeing
<br />it,"
<br />At Nebraska Stock Growers Asso-
<br />ciation conference on Sandhills irri-
<br />gation. Dreeszen predicted that
<br />within 10 years Nebraska could face
<br />plans for "massive water diversions
<br />out of the Sandhills," Under those
<br />grassy hills is probably the largest
<br />body ot underground water in U.S,
<br />-almost certain to draw interest
<br />from water-short areas, Dreeszen
<br />reasons.
<br />These views were backed by Dave
<br />Aiken, University water law special-
<br />ist.
<br />"It is just a matter of time before
<br />people west of us look at the Sand-
<br />hills to see how they can get some of
<br />the water," he said,
<br />
<br />A high level disagreement that could profoundly attect future water
<br />plans in Nebraska is about to emerge from the technical drawing
<br />boards to the policy'making tables, The points at issue could extend to
<br />the divvying up of water among the MiSSOUri Basin states,
<br />The question revolves around the degree to which pumping of
<br />underground water near a stream depletes the flow in that stream,
<br />Planners in the U,S. Bureau of Reclamation and the Nebraska
<br />Natural Resources Commission see a significant link between these
<br />actions, Nebraska's chief hydrological experts-Mike Jess. director of
<br />the Department of Water Resources, and Vince Dreeszen, director of
<br />the University of Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, and
<br />their stalls-agree but see considerably less stream depletion from
<br />groundwater pumping,
<br />At stake are estimates of future water availability for projects pro-
<br />posed to use water from the Platte and other major rivers passing
<br />through areas of pump irrigation.
<br />More imminent are figures to be used in the water accounting system
<br />being assembled by the Missouri Basin States Association, Designed
<br />to provide a computerized model of the Missouri Basin waters, which
<br />includes all of Nebraska's flowing streams, its principal purpose will be
<br />to assess future water availability throughout the basin,
<br />It could be a factor in any inter,state compact allocating water
<br />among the states-if projections ot stream flows in Nebraska show a
<br />large amount of depletion because of pumping, this state could be
<br />allotted less water than if the anticipated tlows were larger,
<br />The MBSA report assumes a direct but time-dependent impact of
<br />groundwater pumping within seven miles of the Platte resulting in
<br />streamflow depletion, One attitude by Nebraska hydrologists is that
<br />the MBSA study design selected finds "lots of depletion" and is not
<br />based on actual experience,
<br />One conclusion is that "any continuing support for this type of work,
<br />either verbally or financially, can only be at the expense of truth and the
<br />detriment ot Nebraska and other basin states,"
<br />If this difference of opinion is not resolved, credibility of the MBSA
<br />accounting system could be jeopardized in Nebraska.
<br />Meetings between the Nebraskans and representatives of the
<br />Bureau and MBSA have brought a better understanding of each other's
<br />views. Jess says, with neither side claiming absolute correctness,
<br />Much of the disagreement stems from the MBSA's use of a fixed
<br />formula as opposed to Dreeszen's contention that the depletion factor
<br />varies from basin to basin and that "the Platte is a whole different
<br />animaL"
<br />Dreeszen says the argument for high depletion rates is based on
<br />both the withdrawal of water by pumping and the evapo,transportation
<br />effect of water escaping through densely-growing plants,
<br />But he contends that the cultivated vegetation of today doesn't re-
<br />lease any more water than the original grass in pre-settlement days and
<br />that if pumping didn't keep the water table somewhat below the
<br />surface, much of the underground water would be lost from
<br />evaporation from the top levels of soil.
<br />
<br />Future irrigation in the Cedar Yalley of central Nebraska is keenly
<br />affected by the stream depletion controversy, A long'studied irrigation
<br />project there is being discouraged by the Bureau of Reclamation which
<br />feels pump irrigation has or will use too much of the flow of the Cedar
<br />River, a tributary of the Loup. to support a surface project.
<br />
<br />/--c
<br />
<br />Dreeszen and Jess have advised project sponsors that "the Bureau's
<br />forecast of future hydrologic conditions paints a far too gloomy
<br />picture,"
<br />Such encouragement comes at a crucial time for backers of the
<br />project. Authorization for the Cedar Valley Reclamation District
<br />expires this year and must receive voter approval to be extended
<br />another 15 years. Michael Shaughnessy of St. Paul, attorney for the
<br />district. says this "critical" vote probably will be scheduled for late this
<br />spring,
<br />
<br />The Platte River's prospects as a source of additional irrigation activity
<br />is a somewhat dillerent story.
<br />In spite of his optimistic views on stream depletion, Jess doesn't
<br />expect more than one more irrigation project to be built using Platte
<br />flows above Columbus, His view, which is not shared by Dreeszen or
<br />some Resources Commission planners, is based more on economic,
<br />political and social factors than on water supply.
<br />Present uncertainties about future availability of Platte water would
<br />be magnified If one more project is built there, he reasons, This would
<br />discourage the commitment of private or public funds for any addi-
<br />tional projects and would heighten opposition from environmentalists,
<br />municipalities and other competing water interests, he figures,
<br />A half dozen separate project proposals counting on Platte water are
<br />presently lined up, While avoiding any favoritism, Jess gauges the
<br />proposals this way:
<br />-The lillie Blue proposal for the Catherland project appears to be
<br />turthest along with planning and feasibility studies,
<br />- The Prairie Bend and Twin Valley proposals in Buffalo-Hall
<br />Counties are currently in the spotlight trying to get federal feasibility
<br />studies started.
<br />-The Upper Big Blue proposal for irrigation in the York-Aurora
<br />area-tied in with the Plum Creek reservoir envisioned by the Tri-
<br />County Public Power and Irrigation District and the Whooping Crane
<br />Trust which seeks water in the Platte in early spring on its way eastward
<br />to the Upper Blue-probably has the broadest political backing.
<br />-Proposals for the Enders project in southwestern Nebraska and
<br />the Twin Plalle's use of a Perkins County water right for the Ogallala
<br />area are farther behind in planning,
<br />
<br />Federal Resources
<br />
<br />Groundwater recharge will be back
<br />in congressional spotlight this year,
<br />with Nebraska Congressman Doug
<br />Bereuter's reintroduction of legisla'
<br />tion calling for demonstration pro,
<br />jects across the West on how under-
<br />ground water supplies can be re-
<br />charged,
<br />Bill also would add recharge to
<br />benefits figured in Bureau of Recla'
<br />mation projects,
<br />Noting widespread support for
<br />measure last year, Bereuter proba-
<br />bly will abandon earlier plan to hold
<br />hearings in Nebraska and other
<br />western states.
<br />
<br />"The Commissioner of Reclama-
<br />tion (Roberl Broadbent) and other
<br />noted water experts have assured
<br />me that there is great need for this
<br />legislation, All the testimony re-
<br />ceived was favorable," Bereuter
<br />says,
<br />Only change in this yei:u's iJiit will
<br />be to extend it to all western recla,
<br />mation states, not just High Plains:
<br />should widen support even more,
<br />Bereuter reasons.
<br />He tigures Nebraska, with excep-
<br />tional capacity for groundwater re-
<br />charge, will be principal beneficiary
<br />from added recharge intelligence,
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />'~
<br />
<br />----,--,-~----r;;, -
<br />."1" " "" ". <, "I ,
<br />~ , ". r,,,;'\
<br />.... ,...;;." """
<br />j.. .~Jt': .~."
<br />.,. YO:'
<br />
<br />,
<br />-c-----;--:..,~'--c,j.\
<br />, --:'--,.
<br />.' ,'....
<br />" ,,'----,
<br />
<br />['--".I'-~,:---.-..,
<br />,"" I --.....
<br />. Ie' .."",, ~
<br />.,I. ",."",~'.." I"'''' ~
<br />I . I"',,"'''~'-'I " \ \
<br />",I""i,
<br />j" !
<br />.'')
<br />-...,
<br />> ~\
<br />)
<br />\.
<br />'.~
<br />(,
<br />,(.;;
<br />/' ~,::--......... '~1 .\: 1"'<
<br />"~..' . ..' "'" ,,~ .\ -,(
<br />;., .J" ':',.< '{1.)
<br />. ~- ~ "
<br />".,
<br />
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
<br />...,/""","",.l' "u"
<br />p.... '.,",1, ,~~'",.\
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />I
<br />,I
<br />I
<br />
<br />"::""
<br />
<br />,"".l\.'.IH.".
<br />
<br />.",
<br />
<br />'"
<br />
<br />~ ;")-
<br />"_n
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />
<br />: ~ .
<br />, .,
<br />'"'
<br />
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />',';'
<br />
<br />j'
<br />I
<br />
<br />'. ,', .]'
<br />'.'\"'" ",'.
<br />
<br />....
<br />
<br />.~
<br />...,
<br />~'"
<br />
<br />Energy Resources
<br />
<br />Determined effort to slow down
<br />soaring prices of natural gas and
<br />propane will be made by Legisla-
<br />ture, but success wifl be elusive;
<br />there's not much state lawmakers
<br />can do,
<br />Sen, Loran Schmit vows to make
<br />this high priority item for Public
<br />Works Committee, notes his own
<br />experience in paying nearly three
<br />times as much for propane last year
<br />as in 1981.
<br />"These energy costs will kill us if
<br />we don't get them worked out."
<br />Schmit asserts,
<br />He sees promotion and possible
<br />state support of alternate sources of
<br />energy-solar, alcohol, wind. geo-
<br />thermal-as one way to attack prob-
<br />lem,
<br />
<br />.1
<br />I
<br />.1
<br />
<br />,- ,.-,-, ,.;" ~.
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />'t\..
<br />
<br />" ~,
<br />
<br />~
<br />~'
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />." '.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />~,
<br />
<br />I." ~ 'H', I'''~ ~'''G, 8"5__'"
<br />
<br />~ ", I.".:..~ ~ ,>. _'j
<br />"', I ".. "
<br />(, 1 I ..4~ '~.~. " I"
<br />
<br />~
<br />- i '
<br />
<br />..".,:--",' ....
<br />l.'.,"-'
<br />
<br />'f..
<br />
<br />,,'
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />'''' '.... " '. '
<br />\,U'"" ".
<br />. ,1) ..... ~ F,
<br />l u '- "~"
<br />
<br />'r'~
<br />- i' ~,
<br />
<br />,,-?
<br />
<br />OJ,,
<br />,'~.' I< I', _," II
<br />. 'II<~ \~..t 1'.':;,.\
<br />,e -1
<br />"",,',.~ ,'.
<br />"",' ""'-,'"
<br />
<br />~ I
<br />"'I
<br />" )
<br />'", '., \
<br />
<br />,~
<br />
<br />......~
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />,.:.4
<br />~:~ .,
<br />~ ..- ."'-'
<br />, A,I '~.'.l
<br />
<br />.. .;"",
<br />
<br />
<br />~. .....
<br />
<br />I"'" .
<br />~,": ,,'
<br />," i.'" .
<br />~
<br />,,,,, ,.
<br />
<br />,I, ,
<br />...... ..~
<br />
<br />
<br />~ , ",.l '.1.., t,-
<br />. "..", f-"
<br />''','' " '\
<br />~
<br />t...., ~ <
<br />l
<br />'i
<br />~, ~-~',,-..- .-,-'-\,
<br />
<br />/3,:8",
<br />'.';..It-AI,,,"
<br />
<br />....~ ',.1...' ",;,
<br />
<br />. ..
<br />., -\
<br />,,~..-
<br />..
<br />
<br />-' '. ,~:-,
<br />
<br />,]
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />
<br />Possible Water Storage Sites
<br />
<br />A total of 272 possible sites for water storage prolects In Nebraska are
<br />identified on this map prepared by the University of Nebraska Conservation
<br />and Survey Division, Of these sites for 1,000 acre feet or more of storage, 59
<br />have dams constructed or under construction: 213 not yet developed, A
<br />small number of the undeveloped sites have been rejected by some agency,
<br />
<br />Site locations were gathered from 30 local, state and federal agencies, The
<br />map, with explanatory tables, will be part of a forthcoming policy issue
<br />study on supplemental water supply in Nebraska to be published by the
<br />Natural Resources Commission.
<br />
|