Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the situation, but loan well 8eo vnloro other faotors along <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />En. SCnUGHAI.1: What do you moan by that? <br /> <br />un. CAIlP:GllTER; Let me oorreot probably your thought <br /> <br />beforo the question is answered. The. decision which you men- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tion has certain other faotors which go with tho lorinciple, one <br /> <br />of which is that it is incumbent upon the lowor states to build <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />thoir own reservoirs and to oeo to it that tho wator dOGS <br /> <br />not waste to tho sea, - the surplus. <br /> <br />UR. CALD~~LL: That's an incident. What is the uso of <br /> <br />compacting on a proposition of that kind that's sott.led by tho <br /> <br />Supremo Court decision. That's my quostion. <br /> <br />1m. HOOVER, To go back to our original discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Norviel's suggestion was that thoro shculd be a minimum <br /> <br />flow, that is, in tho nature of a guarantee and I am wondering <br /> <br />whether er net if this is purely a quostion of eQuitable <br /> <br />apportionment, one oan ask for a guarantee of a minimum flow <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />and whether a famine peried does not imply an equitable <br />I <br />apportionment for 'such a period. There is established a state <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of famine, and you deal with it not as a matter of theory <br /> <br />but as a matter of reality and proceed to an equitable appor- <br /> <br />tionment of the entire basin on a basis of a famine nather <br /> <br />th~n in an assur0d minimumo <br /> <br />lill. CAllP:8N'.i'Ell: ThD. t was my thought in dropping back tc tho <br /> <br />ten year average and that the fatline automatically takes care <br /> <br />the lines that have develeped might make the lower states <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />apprehensive of a deliberate action above, which might add to <br /> <br />the famine. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />15th-S.F.-14 <br />