Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" ..., ,.-{ \ <br />!~ 0 OJ 1. <br /> <br />Thermal Stratification and Mixing Patterns <br /> <br />Thermal stratification is one of the most impor- <br />tant physical processes in the annual cycle of a lake or <br />reservoir. Thermal stratification is a direct result of <br />heating by the sun and the variability of water density <br />with temperature. Typically, reservoirs such as Pueblo <br />Reservoir that are located in the temperate zone <br />undergo an annual cycle of warming and cooling that <br />affect the timing and extent of stratification and mixing. <br />In Pueblo Reservoir, thermal stratification results in a <br />warm, less dense water layer near the reservoir sur- <br />face-the epilimnion; a cooler, more dense deep <br />layer-the hypolimnion; and a transitional zone <br />between the two layers-the thermocline or metalim- <br />nion, The density gradient that results from thermal <br />stratification suppresses the vertical movement of <br />water particles while allowing their horizontal move- <br />mentto become more pronounced and persistent <br />(Wunderlich, 1971). <br />Stratification and mixing patterns in Pueblo Res- <br />ervoir were evaluated with temperature-profile mea- <br />surements that generally were made at 3-ft-depth <br />increments from the water surface to the reservoir bot- <br />tom at several established transects located between the <br />reservoir inflow and the dam (fig. ]) from 1985 through <br />]989 (Ugland and others, ]988, 1990; Edelmann and <br />others, 199]), The temperature-profile data indicate <br />that there is little lateral variation in temperatures <br />within a transect; therefore, the thermal profile of the <br />reservoir may be adequately defined with measure- <br />ments made at a central location within each transect. <br />Additionally, diel variations in the water-temperature <br />profile were evaluated with temperature data collected <br />during separate 24-hour periods in July 1986, May <br />1987, and July ]987 (Edelmann and others, ]991), <br />During these periods, reservoir temperature profiles did <br />not vary enough to result in diel variations in reservoir <br />stratification and mixing patterns; therefore, a single <br />temperature profile made during the day generally can <br />be expected to define the daily mixing and stratification <br />patterns. <br />A comparison of temperature-profile data col- <br />lected from ] 985 through 1989 (U gland and others, <br />1988, 1990; Edelmann and others, 1991) indicates <br />there is little year-to-year variation in the spatial and <br />temporal temperature patterns in Pueblo Reservoir. <br />Temperature-profile data were collected for a 5-year <br />period that included a wide range of hydrologic condi- <br />tions (figs. 2 and 3); therefore, unless Arkansas River <br />or Pueblo Reservoir water-operations practices change <br />substantially, the annual stratification and mixing pat- <br />terns observed in ] 985 through 1989 can be expected to <br />continue in the future if water levels, inflows, and out- <br /> <br />flows remain within the range observed during 1985 <br />through ] 989. <br /> <br />The temperature profiles (fig, 4) also were used <br />to evaluate the initial routing of the Arkansas River <br />within the reservoir-the inflowing water enters the <br />reservoir at a depth of equal density, which for Pueblo <br />Reservoir generally is determined by water tempera- <br />ture. Inflow that is wanner than the reservoir will enter <br />as overflow at the reservoir surface because the warm <br />inflow is less dense than the colder reservoir water. <br />]nterflow, which is the routing of water into the middle <br />of the water column, results when the inflow is cooler <br />and more dense than the surface water and warmer and <br />less dense than the bottom water. Underflow results <br />when the inflow is colder and more dense than the res- <br />ervoir water and results in initial routing of the inflow <br />along the reservoir bottom. The point in a reservoir <br />where inflow plunges or flows beneath the reservoir <br />surface is referred to as the plunge point. <br /> <br />Underflow and interflow seem to be the more <br />dominant flow patterns in Pueblo Reservoir. The <br />plunge point in the reservoir typically is located in the <br />upstream end of the reservoir between transects I and <br />3. Routing of inflow through the entire reservoir can- <br />not be determined by the temperature of the inflow and <br />upstream end of the reservoir because of some degree <br />of mixing in the downstream end of the reservoir. The <br />outlet type and operation of a reservoir also affect the <br />routing of horizontal density currents, As previously <br />discussed in the "]ntroduction" section, Pueblo Reser- <br />voir has a mu]tilevel outlet structure that is capable of <br />releasing water from several depths. However, the <br />majority of flow is released from the river outlet <br />located about 41 ft from the reservoir bottom. During <br />periods that a reservoir is stratified, Ford (1990) indi- <br />cated that vertical flow can be inhibited and the outflow <br />zone can be restricted to a horizontal layer that can <br />extend the full length of the reservoir. In Pueblo Res- <br />ervoir, the horizontal layer encompasses a large portion <br />of the reservoir and, during peak outflow, extends most <br />of the length of the reservoir. <br /> <br />Diel variations in the temperature of the Arkan- <br />sas River result in corresponding diel variations in the <br />initial routing of inflow into the reservoir. The mean <br />diel variation in the temperature of the Arkansas River <br />inflow is about4.50C, and the ranges of water temper- <br />ature in the river often overlap the water temperature in <br />the reservoir. Therefore, throughout much of the year, <br />it is common for the initial routing of inflow to include <br />overflow, interflow, and underflow during a 24-hour <br />period, During these 24-hour periods, there still can be <br />a dominant direction of inflow routing if the relative <br />density difference between the river and reservoir <br /> <br />12 Physical, Chemical, and Biological Characteristics of Pueblo Reservoir, Colorado, 1985-89 <br />