|
<br />" ..., ,.-{ \
<br />!~ 0 OJ 1.
<br />
<br />Thermal Stratification and Mixing Patterns
<br />
<br />Thermal stratification is one of the most impor-
<br />tant physical processes in the annual cycle of a lake or
<br />reservoir. Thermal stratification is a direct result of
<br />heating by the sun and the variability of water density
<br />with temperature. Typically, reservoirs such as Pueblo
<br />Reservoir that are located in the temperate zone
<br />undergo an annual cycle of warming and cooling that
<br />affect the timing and extent of stratification and mixing.
<br />In Pueblo Reservoir, thermal stratification results in a
<br />warm, less dense water layer near the reservoir sur-
<br />face-the epilimnion; a cooler, more dense deep
<br />layer-the hypolimnion; and a transitional zone
<br />between the two layers-the thermocline or metalim-
<br />nion, The density gradient that results from thermal
<br />stratification suppresses the vertical movement of
<br />water particles while allowing their horizontal move-
<br />mentto become more pronounced and persistent
<br />(Wunderlich, 1971).
<br />Stratification and mixing patterns in Pueblo Res-
<br />ervoir were evaluated with temperature-profile mea-
<br />surements that generally were made at 3-ft-depth
<br />increments from the water surface to the reservoir bot-
<br />tom at several established transects located between the
<br />reservoir inflow and the dam (fig. ]) from 1985 through
<br />]989 (Ugland and others, ]988, 1990; Edelmann and
<br />others, 199]), The temperature-profile data indicate
<br />that there is little lateral variation in temperatures
<br />within a transect; therefore, the thermal profile of the
<br />reservoir may be adequately defined with measure-
<br />ments made at a central location within each transect.
<br />Additionally, diel variations in the water-temperature
<br />profile were evaluated with temperature data collected
<br />during separate 24-hour periods in July 1986, May
<br />1987, and July ]987 (Edelmann and others, ]991),
<br />During these periods, reservoir temperature profiles did
<br />not vary enough to result in diel variations in reservoir
<br />stratification and mixing patterns; therefore, a single
<br />temperature profile made during the day generally can
<br />be expected to define the daily mixing and stratification
<br />patterns.
<br />A comparison of temperature-profile data col-
<br />lected from ] 985 through 1989 (U gland and others,
<br />1988, 1990; Edelmann and others, 1991) indicates
<br />there is little year-to-year variation in the spatial and
<br />temporal temperature patterns in Pueblo Reservoir.
<br />Temperature-profile data were collected for a 5-year
<br />period that included a wide range of hydrologic condi-
<br />tions (figs. 2 and 3); therefore, unless Arkansas River
<br />or Pueblo Reservoir water-operations practices change
<br />substantially, the annual stratification and mixing pat-
<br />terns observed in ] 985 through 1989 can be expected to
<br />continue in the future if water levels, inflows, and out-
<br />
<br />flows remain within the range observed during 1985
<br />through ] 989.
<br />
<br />The temperature profiles (fig, 4) also were used
<br />to evaluate the initial routing of the Arkansas River
<br />within the reservoir-the inflowing water enters the
<br />reservoir at a depth of equal density, which for Pueblo
<br />Reservoir generally is determined by water tempera-
<br />ture. Inflow that is wanner than the reservoir will enter
<br />as overflow at the reservoir surface because the warm
<br />inflow is less dense than the colder reservoir water.
<br />]nterflow, which is the routing of water into the middle
<br />of the water column, results when the inflow is cooler
<br />and more dense than the surface water and warmer and
<br />less dense than the bottom water. Underflow results
<br />when the inflow is colder and more dense than the res-
<br />ervoir water and results in initial routing of the inflow
<br />along the reservoir bottom. The point in a reservoir
<br />where inflow plunges or flows beneath the reservoir
<br />surface is referred to as the plunge point.
<br />
<br />Underflow and interflow seem to be the more
<br />dominant flow patterns in Pueblo Reservoir. The
<br />plunge point in the reservoir typically is located in the
<br />upstream end of the reservoir between transects I and
<br />3. Routing of inflow through the entire reservoir can-
<br />not be determined by the temperature of the inflow and
<br />upstream end of the reservoir because of some degree
<br />of mixing in the downstream end of the reservoir. The
<br />outlet type and operation of a reservoir also affect the
<br />routing of horizontal density currents, As previously
<br />discussed in the "]ntroduction" section, Pueblo Reser-
<br />voir has a mu]tilevel outlet structure that is capable of
<br />releasing water from several depths. However, the
<br />majority of flow is released from the river outlet
<br />located about 41 ft from the reservoir bottom. During
<br />periods that a reservoir is stratified, Ford (1990) indi-
<br />cated that vertical flow can be inhibited and the outflow
<br />zone can be restricted to a horizontal layer that can
<br />extend the full length of the reservoir. In Pueblo Res-
<br />ervoir, the horizontal layer encompasses a large portion
<br />of the reservoir and, during peak outflow, extends most
<br />of the length of the reservoir.
<br />
<br />Diel variations in the temperature of the Arkan-
<br />sas River result in corresponding diel variations in the
<br />initial routing of inflow into the reservoir. The mean
<br />diel variation in the temperature of the Arkansas River
<br />inflow is about4.50C, and the ranges of water temper-
<br />ature in the river often overlap the water temperature in
<br />the reservoir. Therefore, throughout much of the year,
<br />it is common for the initial routing of inflow to include
<br />overflow, interflow, and underflow during a 24-hour
<br />period, During these 24-hour periods, there still can be
<br />a dominant direction of inflow routing if the relative
<br />density difference between the river and reservoir
<br />
<br />12 Physical, Chemical, and Biological Characteristics of Pueblo Reservoir, Colorado, 1985-89
<br />
|