Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />tAr" <br /> <br />f' -,"'I.-'\: <br />,~.:.;;.; <br /> <br />CHAPTER 1 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Scope and Purpose of the Study <br /> <br />~o~8 <br /> <br />As established by the Co rado State Constitution, water is appropriated for beneficial use. In the <br />development of the ate, water supplies have been appropriated for domesric, agricultural and <br />industria}iurpose~ As Colorado has continued to grow, the demands for domestic (municipal) <br />water supplies h~created economic incentives to sell and transfer agricultural water supplies. <br />This report, authorized by the Colorado General Assembly as a part of Senate Bill 92-87, documents <br />a multi-disciplinary study of issues arising out of a possible large-scale transfer of water out of the <br />Ft. Lyon Canal to alternative uses. It examines changes to be anticipated in such a water transfer <br />and proposes alternative actions to such a water transfer. This chapter presents introductory <br />information on the Arkansas River Basin and the area of study. <br /> <br />In Chapter 2, issues associated with water transfers in and around the study area are presented <br />along with information on historic water transfers. Chapters 3 and 4 present descriptive <br />information of the Ft. Lyon Canal Company system and the regional socio-economic characteristics. <br />They include a physical description of the system, operational analysis, historical background, and <br />characterization of the social, economic and environmental aspects of the study area, Chapter 5 <br />identifies current and future demands for Ft. Lyon water, inside and outside the study area. <br />Chapter 6 describes the methods employed in alternative analysis and identifies alternatives to <br />potential water transfers out of the Ft. Lyon system. In Phase 2 of this report the most promising <br />altemative(s) and proposed plans for implementation will be developed. <br /> <br />Basin Characteristics <br /> <br />The Arkansas River originates upstream from Leadville at an elevation of over 14,000 feet and exits <br />the state near Holly at 3,400 feet. The basin is illustrated in Figure 1.1. In passing through the <br />plains east of Pueblo to the state lin~, the river gradient is less than 9 feet per mile. About 25,600 <br />square miles is tributary to the Arkansas River in Colorado. Geologically, in the plains the valley <br />aquifer rests in a U-shaped trough, cut into cretaceous shale and limestone bedrock. <br /> <br />Climate in the Arkansas River Basin varies widely in both temperature and precipitation, On the <br />plains, annual precipitation levels increase moving eastward from Pueblo, reaching an average of <br />about 16 inches per year at the state line. Over the study area, average rainfall is 11 to 15 inches, <br />with a high degree of areal, daily, seasonal and annual variability. <br /> <br />The basin's water resources consist of snowmelt, rainfall runoff and ground water development. <br />Most of the surface irrigation systems were constructed between 1874 and 1890. As junior water <br />rights appropriators realized that remaining natural streamflow was generally too variable to supply <br />irrigation requirements during many years, they constructed reservoirs to capture flood flows. The <br />estimated 30-year average annual native streamflow is 283,000 acre feet (af) measured at the <br />Arkansas River gage below Pueblo Reservoir. An additional net 172,000 af is imported from other <br />basins by transmountain diversion projects for use in the Arkansas River Valley (USGS and SCS <br />1992), Total diversions for Colorado ditches between Pueblo and the Kansas state line are <br /> <br />1-1 <br />