Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br /> <br />r. fI''' ,.. ...~ <br />4~~;') <br /> <br />CHAPTER 2 <br /> <br />ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND HISTORICAL WATER TRANSFERS <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />This Chapter includes a description of the water transfer process in Colorado by which agricultural <br />water is moved to urban areas, The specifics of the Colorado Water Supply Company offer to <br />purchase shares of stock in the Ft. Lyon Canal Company in December, 1991, are described as well <br />as the response by shareholders to the offer. Issues arising from large ruraVagricultural to <br />urban/non-agricultural water transfers are summarized. Details of all significant historical Arkansas <br />River water transfers from agricultural use to other uses in or adjacent to the study area are <br />presented, The thirteen transfers illustrate a great variety of impacts and issues connected with <br />water transfers. Factors which may affect the likelihood of sale of water by rural, agricultural <br />owners in southeastern Colorado are presented. The factors are not dissimilar from factors <br />affecting farming elsewhere in Colorado, <br /> <br />Water Transfer Process in Colorado <br /> <br />The water transfer process is basically a free market process constrained by the need to obtain <br />governmental permits and a transfer decree from the water court. The permit and decree processes <br />mayor may not consider the impacts on third parties. Third parties are defined for this study as ~ \ \ <br />any individuals, organizations or elements of the physical natural environment which are not 'yt . , <br />represented as a party to the transaction in a water transfer(s). Such third parties may accrue costs) J!' <br />or benefits from the transaction which go unrecognized in the transfer process, including objectors . <br />to the transfer in water court. <br /> <br />Water rights may be sold with or separate from land. A buyer obtains water rights (and often <br />associated irrigated land) by purchase from individual water rights owners, who are typically <br />individual farmers. Unlike some other western states, water rights are seldom owned by districts <br />or canal companies. A real estate agent or water broker often facilitates the transaction. <br /> <br />The purchase and sale contract entered into by the buyer and seller typically states a price per <br />share or per acre foot of transferable consumptive yield. Often, but not always, the transaction <br />does not close until a water court transfer decree is obtained. The seller usually must agree to <br />"dryup" lands associated with water sold as stated in the water court decree provisions. The <br />contract may specify other obligations of the buyer and seller, and may anticipate conditions in a <br />water court decree. The sales contract may include allocation of liability for compliance with the <br />decree conditions, and related transaction costs, to the buyer or seller. <br /> <br />Typically the buyer desires to obtain a firm water supply for municipal uses. The seller has a <br />fluctuating water supply historically used for farmland irrigation and delivered through a mutual <br />ditch company whose operation is controlled by all irtigators on the ditch. The buyer desires <br />confirmation that a certain minimum quantity of transferable consumptive use water will be <br />available, and that the water will be deliverable to its place of need. In some cases the water is <br />to be exchanged upstream to a storage location and pipeline intake, although sometimes a <br />downstream storage location and pipeline intake can be used. <br /> <br />2.1 <br />