My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11959
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11959
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8583
Description
Rio Grande Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1996
Author
U.S. Geologic Survey
Title
Plan Of Study To Quantify The Hydrologic Relations Between The Rio Grande And Santa Fe Group Aquifer System Near Albuquerque/ Central New Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. (llC')') <br />()\..' u.J'- <br /> <br />The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District (MRGCD, the agency that operates and <br />maintains the irrigation system, including diversions, canals, and drains) measures canal and <br />drain flow with continuous recording gages at four locations between Angostura and Isleta <br />Pueblo and is proposing several more (Ray Gomez, Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District, <br />written commun., September 22, 1995). The riverside drain and the diversion into the <br />Albuquerque Main Canal are monitored just downstream from the diversion at Angostura. The <br />Corrales Main Canal is monitored downstream from the siphon (fig. 3A), and the Albuquerque <br />Riverside Drain is monitored downstream from its confluence with the Alameda Drain (fig. 3B). <br />Additional continuous recording stations are proposed for the canal and drain system returns to <br />the Rio Grande. This would allow separation of gains or losses in the drain and canal systems <br />from those in the river channel. <br /> <br />Basin-Margin and Tributary Recharge <br /> <br />The aquifer system at the margins of the Albuquerque Basin is recharged by inflow of <br />ground water from adjacent basins and by mountain-front recharge. Ground-water inflow from <br />adjacent basins, such as the Espanola or San Juan Basins (fig. 2), occurs at depth in the aquifer <br />system. Mountain-front recharge enters the aquifer system at the contact of basin-fill deposits <br />and adjacent mountain blocks, such as the Sandia Mountains east of Albuquerque, Mountain- <br />front recharge occurs as infiltration of water from streams draining the mountains and as <br />seepage of shallow ground water from mountain valleys or near-surface fractured rock of the <br />mountain block. <br /> <br />Tributary recharge originates as infiltration of water from streams and arroyos that flow <br />toward the Rio Grande from the basin margins. Most tributary recharge is from unlined <br />channels that contain flow for significant time periods. Ephemeral arroyos probably contribute <br />little recharge in comparison because they flow for only short periods as a result of large <br />thunderstorms. Much of the water infiltrated into the arroyo channels during these periods is <br />subsequently evapotranspired to the atmosphere, leaving little water to percolate to the water <br />table (Thomas, 1995, p. 21). <br /> <br />In the Albuquerque area, basin-margin recharge is from the Sandia and Manzanita <br />Mountains, and tributary recharge is along Tijeras Arroyo. Ground-water inflow into the <br />Albuquerque area comes from other parts of the Albuquerque Basin, as discussed previously <br />(see "Santa Fe Group aquifer system" section), rather than from basins adjacent to the <br />Albuquerque Basin. Basin-margin and tributary recharge cannot be directly measured and <br />therefore must be estimated. Basin margin and tributary recharge in the Albuquerque area was <br />estimated using the Kernodle and others (1995) model to be about 25,000 acre-feet for the year <br />ending in March 1994. The ground-water-flow model (Kernodle and others, 1995, figs. 36C and <br />37 A) shows that simulated change in aquifer storage in the basin was sensitive to simulated <br />change in mountain-front and tributary recharge, as well as simulated change in ground-water <br />withdrawal. Because changes in stresses to the aquifer system primarily result in either a <br />change in aquifer storage or a change in the rate of water movement between the surface-water <br />system and the aquifer system, the ability to reasonably estimate recharge would be useful in <br />order to better understand hydrologic relations between the surface-water and ground-water <br />systems. <br /> <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.