My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11959
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11959
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8583
Description
Rio Grande Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1996
Author
U.S. Geologic Survey
Title
Plan Of Study To Quantify The Hydrologic Relations Between The Rio Grande And Santa Fe Group Aquifer System Near Albuquerque/ Central New Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0016;~4 <br /> <br />Inner Valley Alluvium <br /> <br />As described previously, the channel and flood-plain deposits in the inner valley constitute <br />the hydraulic connection between the Rio Grande surface-water system and the remainder of the <br />Santa Fe Group aquifer system. Therefore, the lithologic composition of this alluvium and <br />adjacent deposits is a major factor controlling the volume of water that can move between the <br />surface-water system and the primary production intervals of wells in the Albuquerque area, <br />which are completed in the Santa Fe Group. The hydraulic characteristics of these alluvial <br />deposits can, in part, be estimated on the basis of their lithologic composition, <br /> <br />Basin- and valley-fill aquifers are heterogeneous (hydraulic conductivity varies spacially <br />within the aquifer) and anisotropic (hydraulic conductivity varies depending on direction). As a <br />result, hydraulic conductivity is dependent on the size of a part of the aquifer under <br />consideration. For example, channel deposits in the inner valley alluvium generally contain <br />sand and gravel. A localized part of the aquifer containing only sand and gravel would have <br />relatively large values of hydraulic conductivity. Values of horizontal hydraulic conductivity for <br />these coarse deposits in the inner valley alluvium have been estimated to be about 90 to 350 feet <br />per day by the Bureau of Reclamation (1994b; based on an auger-hole method described by <br />Maasland and Haskew, 1957), and Willis (1993) reported the hydraulic conductivity of gravelly <br />coarse sand to be 65 feet per day. The wide range in possible values (65 to 350 feet per day) for <br />these coarse deposits can be explained by the degree of sorting--larger values of hydraulic <br />conductivity are associated with more uniform grain sizes in the coarser deposits, Flood-plain <br />deposits containing silt and clay have relatively small values of hydraulic conductivity: Willis <br />(1993) listed the conductivity of silty clay to be 0.2 foot per day. A larger part of the aquifer is <br />likely to contain layers or lenses of deposits with different grain sizes and varying degrees of <br />sorting. In such a system, hydraulic conductivity parallel to the layers or lenses (typically <br />horizontal) is in general equal to the weighted arithmetic average of the hydraulic conductivities <br />of each of the deposits. Therefore, when considering a part of an aquifer large enough to be <br />representative of the aquifer's heterogeneity, a middle range of values, rather than the extreme <br />values of horizontal hydraulic conductivity is more representative. Hydraulic conductivity <br />perpendicular to the layers (typically vertical), however, is controlled primarily by the layers <br />having small values of hydraulic conductivity. Individual grains tend to be deposited in an <br />alluvial system flat side down, which also contributes to reduced hydraulic conductivity in the <br />vertical direction compared to the horizontal direction. Average vertical hydraulic conductivity <br />in vertically anisotropic aquifer material, such as the inner valley alluvium, can often be about <br />two or more orders of magnitude less than the average horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Freeze <br />and Cherry, 1979, p. 34). <br /> <br />As discussed above, layers of low-conductivity deposits control the vertical hydraulic <br />conductivity and, therefore, the vertical movement of water in the inner valley alluvium. Flood- <br />plain deposits consist primarily of silt and clay deposited by water moving at lower velocity <br />than water in the active channel. Layers of silty clay exist within much of the inner valley. Many <br />of these silty-clay layers are discontinuous and may be as much as about 15 feet thick locally <br />(Anderholrn and Bullard, 1987). An extensive silty-clay layer at a depth of about 20 feet below <br />land surface has been mapped based on about 470 borehole logs at a Super Fund site in the <br />Albuquerque South Valley (Jacobs Engineering Group, 1995). However, the extent of these clay <br />layers throughout the inner valley is not well known. The continuity of silty-clay layers can <br />significantly effect the vertical hydraulic conductivity. A part of the aquifer with a continuous <br />silty-clay layer will have a lower effective vertical hydraulic conductivity than a part with a <br />discontinuous silty-clay layer of the same thickness and texture. Therefore, knowledge of the <br />nature and distribution of the silts and clays in the inner valley alluvium is essential information <br />to help provide a better understanding of the ability of the alluvium to transmit water vertically <br />between the Santa Fe Group and the Rio Grande. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.