Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_ AlwnlB_ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />III!: t-: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- - <br />f JMR A <br /> <br />- - <br />f I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />_ge4_ <br /> <br /> a e20rIza IOn 0 ccoun ID2 ssues <br />Issue p' IT' Operations Committee or other <br />Number lssue L' KS Staffpositifl!l CO Staff Position KS Staff Comment CO Staff Conunent general Comment(s) <br />31 Section. II (E)(4) Deficits I)f Kar.3a5 Section HI D states: Deficit to be restored to Deficit to be restored to Kansas to work on lhis issue, <br /> and LU (D) are Section Jl delivc:rics due "First transfers from Kansas Section II. Ka'II~~ tr~il loss <br /> unclear as to where tTilllsit }ms shortage deliveries shall make up account as soon as account as soon as Kevin Salter letter of 26 August <br /> transfers to make >> should be replenished to any deficits, if any, in additional water'. addjlio~~I\vater <br /> ,~ 2003 <br /> up deficits should "0 the Kansas Section II the Kansas Transit Loss becomes.3\;ailable in becomes available in <br /> "" <br /> be made account. al,;count.,," (emphasis tranStl loss accou."J1t. transit loss account <br /> added) K':l!l$:aS t~. propo'se Kansas to propose <br /> clar; fyi~~ ~r~s?lut ion clarifying resolution. <br />32" How should transit Based on the ' ' " 'Issue added 24 October 2003 at <br /> loss account be interpretation proposed " meeting between staffs. <br /> u.!IeLl? by Kevin Salter's'letter <br /> >, (21 October 2003)"th~;e' : <br /> u <br /> '0 is a question ofwhe!her. <br /> "" <br /> the transit loss releases <br /> are a front or back"side <br /> operation. <br />40 Exchange of daily Daily detem-umtlions of 'Oaily'"detenninations' of The Operations and The Operations and Resolved <br /> reservoir status the difference b~tw~en the difference between Assistant Operations Assistant Operations <br /> '0 accounts and p.bysical ac~6unts ~d 'physical Secretaries should Secretaries should <br /> accounting ~ <br /> , <br /> '0 measurehlents' at tl1'6', r{ieasurements at the continue to exchange cominue to exchange <br /> ~ <br /> O! reservJrr are an mtegral'. ~~servoir are an integral data data <br /> Reso/ved part oflhe daily I'art of the daily <br /> accoumillg: . a~countillg. <br />41 Non-reporting of ' Need daily accoun~ing All dala and data Kansas will work on analyzing the <br /> Section II(C)(I) >> of non aCl.:ount water for interpretations related to accuracy of the amount of water <br /> determinations ,~ c.~mpliaIl~e wilh this JMR operations should passing through the reservoir under <br /> "0 <br /> "" Section of the 1 ~180 be reported in annual this section. <br /> Operating PTan reports, <br /> <br />2002isSlles ,lab/eM, doc <br /> <br />Joint work product - 24 October 2003 <br /> <br />Draft Issues Table - For discussion purposes only <br />