Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Looking forward, it is hoped that another meeting might be scheduled on Wednesday and/or <br />Thursday, September 24, 25, 2003, Subjects ripe for further consideration include: <br /> <br />4BI&2 <br /> <br />Winter Water Account of convenience and timely distribution of 35% <br />storage charge <br />. Discussion of Mr. Salter's response to Colorado's proposed <br />resolution <br /> <br />4Cl <br /> <br />Appropriate determination of transit loss under Section II (E)( 4) <br />. Discussion ofMr, Salter's comments pertaining to the Ley report <br />. Discussion of additional work to be undertaken as proposed by Ley <br />and the possibility of joint participation by both states <br /> <br />4C2 <br /> <br />Appropriate accounting procedure to be used in settlement for deficit in <br />delivery of Article II to Kansas <br />. Discussion ofMr. Salter's August 26th interpretation of the 1980 <br />Operating Plan <br /> <br />402 <br /> <br />Non-reporting of Section II(C)(I) determination <br />. Discuss whether or not Kansas believes that an incident of <br />inappropriate temporary storage or averaging of flows occurred in <br />2002 <br /> <br />4EI&2 <br /> <br />Interrupted transfers from conservation storage to accounts <br />. Discuss whether Kansas holds principled objections to the practices <br />raised as concerns or if resolution is possible through the means <br />suggested in the issues matri'<:, <br /> <br />The feasibility of alternating the office and duties of Operations Secretary between the <br />states may also be discussed, asswning the Assistant Operations Secretary can deliver a <br />concept paper advocating the procedure in time for this meeting. If not, those discussions <br />may have to be deferred to a later date, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Finally, a fuul r~view of those matrix issues that have been previously debated and <br />briefed before the Operations Committee and deemed less likely to be resolved at the <br />staff level sl:oulj be under..Jken to see if agreement can be reac!:ed as to the e!~ments <br />requestec to be includd ill me December 2003 Report to me Operations COimllittee, <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />~/ !Jj{{ <br /> <br /> <br />Arkansas River Compact Administration <br />Operations Secretary <br /> <br />Attachment <br />cc: Mark Rude <br />