WSP11938 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4BI&2 4B3 4Cl 4C2 402 4EI&2 Winter Water Account of convenience and timely distribution of 35% storage charge . Without providing comment concerning Colorado's 5/02 proposed resolution, Kansas verbally offered an alternative idea for consideration, "Colorado requested consideration of and response to its proposal before entertaining additional ideas, Criteria for determining storage of Section ill vs, Compact water . Kansas reported that it bas not revised its altemati ve accounting procedure in response to Colorado's criticisms, however, they are in the process of converting the application to Excel format prior to making those changes . Colorado responded to a criticism of the comparison of current conservation storage to that of the 1950-1975 period that had been provided for review by revising the data used to be consistent with that in the ARCA annual reports and provided a revised summary for Kansas' review . Kansas also noted that the comparison would be more meaningful if it were to be adjusted to account for the fact that during the 1950-1975 period conservation storage was affected by the 100 cfs pass through provision pursuant to Article V (A) of the Compact. Appropriate determination of transit loss under Section II (E)(4) . Kansas reported no progress in reviewing the Ley report, however, a request was made for the underlying data and analysis in order to facilitate verification of the conclusions, . Colorado renewed its request for daily diversion records by Kansas ditches for the period concurrent with and subsequent to each demand for Section II account water releases from 1980 to the present to be used to determine the period oftime follO\ving the end of a release made for Kansas during which Kansas ditches generally continue to benefit from the release operation, This should aid in formulating an appropriate definition of uansit loss to be used in ~uch determinations, Appropriate a:counting procedure to be "sed in settlement for deficit in de;;very of Article II LO Kan,::..> . Kansas did not present a proposed resolution to clarify the appropriate procedure, Non-reporting of Section II(C)(I) determination . Kansas provided no report to verify whether a complaint involving inappropriate temporary storage or averaging of flows is alleged in 2002 Interrupted transfers from conservation storage to accounts . The principle behind Kansas' concerns remain unclear