<br />Juan River plus 765 gpm (2.89 m3 per minute) ofmois.
<br />ture in the coal input, and 630 gpm (2.38 m3 per
<br />minute) produced by the methane-synthesis reaction. Of
<br />this total input, some 2,200 gpm (8.3 m3 per minute)
<br />will react to form gas, 1,300 gpm (4.9 m3 per minute)
<br />will be piped to the coal nnne and other offsite users,
<br />900 gpm (3.4 m3 per minute) will evaporat'e from waste
<br />, ponds, 190 gpm (0.72 m3 per minute) will leave as wet
<br />ash, 2,965 gpm (I \.2 m3 per minute) will escape in the
<br />cooling system, and the remaining 840 gpm (3_2 m3 per
<br />minute) is accounted for in numerous small plant dis-
<br />charges. This represents an extreme case of water conser-
<br />vation as the plant is engineered so that only 15 percent
<br />of gross cooling requirements is met by evaporative cool.
<br />ing. In other areas and under other conditions water
<br />consumption might be considerably higher. In terms of
<br />annual consumption at an assumed load factor of 91
<br />percent, the above estimates indicate total water
<br />consumption of 14,000 acre-ft (17 miltion m3) per year
<br />of which about 2,500 (3 million m3) is supplied to the
<br />mine and other offsite uses, leaving a consumptive
<br />demand for the plant of about \I ,500 acre-n
<br />(14 million m3) per year_ Of the lolal consumption of
<br />t4,000 acre-n (17 million m3) per year, tl,700 acre-n
<br />(14 million m3) per year is supplied by imported waler,
<br />1,300 acre-n (\.6 million m3) per year is moisture con-
<br />tained in the input coal, and the remaining 1,000 acre-n
<br />(\.2 million m3) per year is produced in the methane-
<br />synthesis reaction.
<br />The Synthetic Gas-Coal Task Force (1973, p. XIl-3)
<br />calculated substantiaUy higher make-up water demand,
<br />for typical coal-gasification plants. The following table
<br />summarizes their estimates of the annual water require.
<br />ments of a typical 250 billion Btu per day (~250
<br />million scf per day or 7 million m3 per day) plant as
<br />follows:
<br />
<br />It was assumed in the first instance that the above
<br />plants would be totaUy water cooled; the different cates
<br />of make-up reflect different requirements for blowdown
<br />which depends upon the quality of input water. The
<br />3-percent rate would apply to high-quality supply water
<br />while the 7-percent rate would apply to brackish or
<br />highly turbid supplies. The lower line of the table esti-
<br />mates water demand for in-plant use based on partial air
<br />cooling~ the lower ranges of these estimates are compara-
<br />ble to the design estimates for the Burnham Complex.
<br />To summarize, water consumption in coal gasification
<br />plants producing pipeline gas of 250 million scf per day
<br />(7 million m3 per day) capacity can be expected to
<br />range from about 10,000 acre-ft (\2 million m3) per
<br />year where water is at a premium to 45,000 acre-ft
<br />(55 million m3) per year where abundant but poor-
<br />quality warer is used for cooling. The principal differ.
<br />ences are in evaporative cooling requirement and relate
<br />to the extent to which air cooling is employed and
<br />greater waste-water disposal where input water is of low
<br />quality.
<br />Production of low Btu gas for power.plant consump-
<br />tion onsite ralher than high Btu pipeline-quality gas is
<br />considered feasible in many situations. This can be
<br />accomplished in essentially the way planned at the
<br />Burnham Complex except that the methane-synthesis
<br />process is omitted. As the methane synthesis does not
<br />playa major role in water consumption, it is believed
<br />that this alternative mode of gas production would have
<br />tittle bearing on consumptive demand for comparable
<br />Btu outputs.
<br />
<br />COAL L1QUEFACfION
<br />
<br />Estimation of unit values of water consumption in
<br />producing oil from coal is tenuous at best because no
<br />
<br />Make-up role, in percen/oge of cooling K10ler circum/ion
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />Bituminous and subbitunllnoUS
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />5
<br />1,742
<br />396
<br />20,178
<br />22,316
<br />32,451
<br />16,225
<br />\I
<br />
<br /> Lignite
<br />3 5 7
<br />1,705 1,705 1,705
<br />359 359 359
<br />10,096 16,828 23,559
<br />12,160 18,892 25,623
<br />17,682 27,472 37,259
<br />8,845 13,682 16,630
<br /> 045:1
<br />
<br />Process water, gpm . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .
<br />Boiler make-up, gpm ......................
<br />Cooling make-up, gpm .....................
<br />
<br />1,742
<br />396
<br />12,107
<br />
<br />1,742
<br />396
<br />28,249
<br />
<br />Total, gpm ....................... .. . . . ..
<br />
<br />14,245
<br />
<br />30,387
<br />
<br />Total, acre-ft per year at 90 percent load factor..
<br />
<br />20,714
<br />
<br />Minimal demand assuming partial air cooling,
<br />acre-ft per year at 90 percent load factor . . . . .
<br />
<br />10,358
<br />
<br />22,094
<br />
<br />44,187
<br />
|