Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Juan River plus 765 gpm (2.89 m3 per minute) ofmois. <br />ture in the coal input, and 630 gpm (2.38 m3 per <br />minute) produced by the methane-synthesis reaction. Of <br />this total input, some 2,200 gpm (8.3 m3 per minute) <br />will react to form gas, 1,300 gpm (4.9 m3 per minute) <br />will be piped to the coal nnne and other offsite users, <br />900 gpm (3.4 m3 per minute) will evaporat'e from waste <br />, ponds, 190 gpm (0.72 m3 per minute) will leave as wet <br />ash, 2,965 gpm (I \.2 m3 per minute) will escape in the <br />cooling system, and the remaining 840 gpm (3_2 m3 per <br />minute) is accounted for in numerous small plant dis- <br />charges. This represents an extreme case of water conser- <br />vation as the plant is engineered so that only 15 percent <br />of gross cooling requirements is met by evaporative cool. <br />ing. In other areas and under other conditions water <br />consumption might be considerably higher. In terms of <br />annual consumption at an assumed load factor of 91 <br />percent, the above estimates indicate total water <br />consumption of 14,000 acre-ft (17 miltion m3) per year <br />of which about 2,500 (3 million m3) is supplied to the <br />mine and other offsite uses, leaving a consumptive <br />demand for the plant of about \I ,500 acre-n <br />(14 million m3) per year_ Of the lolal consumption of <br />t4,000 acre-n (17 million m3) per year, tl,700 acre-n <br />(14 million m3) per year is supplied by imported waler, <br />1,300 acre-n (\.6 million m3) per year is moisture con- <br />tained in the input coal, and the remaining 1,000 acre-n <br />(\.2 million m3) per year is produced in the methane- <br />synthesis reaction. <br />The Synthetic Gas-Coal Task Force (1973, p. XIl-3) <br />calculated substantiaUy higher make-up water demand, <br />for typical coal-gasification plants. The following table <br />summarizes their estimates of the annual water require. <br />ments of a typical 250 billion Btu per day (~250 <br />million scf per day or 7 million m3 per day) plant as <br />follows: <br /> <br />It was assumed in the first instance that the above <br />plants would be totaUy water cooled; the different cates <br />of make-up reflect different requirements for blowdown <br />which depends upon the quality of input water. The <br />3-percent rate would apply to high-quality supply water <br />while the 7-percent rate would apply to brackish or <br />highly turbid supplies. The lower line of the table esti- <br />mates water demand for in-plant use based on partial air <br />cooling~ the lower ranges of these estimates are compara- <br />ble to the design estimates for the Burnham Complex. <br />To summarize, water consumption in coal gasification <br />plants producing pipeline gas of 250 million scf per day <br />(7 million m3 per day) capacity can be expected to <br />range from about 10,000 acre-ft (\2 million m3) per <br />year where water is at a premium to 45,000 acre-ft <br />(55 million m3) per year where abundant but poor- <br />quality warer is used for cooling. The principal differ. <br />ences are in evaporative cooling requirement and relate <br />to the extent to which air cooling is employed and <br />greater waste-water disposal where input water is of low <br />quality. <br />Production of low Btu gas for power.plant consump- <br />tion onsite ralher than high Btu pipeline-quality gas is <br />considered feasible in many situations. This can be <br />accomplished in essentially the way planned at the <br />Burnham Complex except that the methane-synthesis <br />process is omitted. As the methane synthesis does not <br />playa major role in water consumption, it is believed <br />that this alternative mode of gas production would have <br />tittle bearing on consumptive demand for comparable <br />Btu outputs. <br /> <br />COAL L1QUEFACfION <br /> <br />Estimation of unit values of water consumption in <br />producing oil from coal is tenuous at best because no <br /> <br />Make-up role, in percen/oge of cooling K10ler circum/ion <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Bituminous and subbitunllnoUS <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />5 <br />1,742 <br />396 <br />20,178 <br />22,316 <br />32,451 <br />16,225 <br />\I <br /> <br /> Lignite <br />3 5 7 <br />1,705 1,705 1,705 <br />359 359 359 <br />10,096 16,828 23,559 <br />12,160 18,892 25,623 <br />17,682 27,472 37,259 <br />8,845 13,682 16,630 <br /> 045:1 <br /> <br />Process water, gpm . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . <br />Boiler make-up, gpm ...................... <br />Cooling make-up, gpm ..................... <br /> <br />1,742 <br />396 <br />12,107 <br /> <br />1,742 <br />396 <br />28,249 <br /> <br />Total, gpm ....................... .. . . . .. <br /> <br />14,245 <br /> <br />30,387 <br /> <br />Total, acre-ft per year at 90 percent load factor.. <br /> <br />20,714 <br /> <br />Minimal demand assuming partial air cooling, <br />acre-ft per year at 90 percent load factor . . . . . <br /> <br />10,358 <br /> <br />22,094 <br /> <br />44,187 <br />