My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11935
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11935
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1977
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1976
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />lGJ <br /> <br />included for the powerplant for <br />keeping salts from the Colorado River <br />System aft",r the plant i" eventually <br />laken out of service and dismantled. <br />8. The comments on the EJS for <br />the Dolores Project in SOuthwestern <br />Colorado, S(cltro that there should be <br />a diSCussion of salt pickup from <br />project facilities located on Mancos <br />shale, :hat canals passing through the <br />shale should have concrete linings, <br />and that measures should be adopted <br />for reducing the salt pickup from <br />lands in thl:' Montezuma Valley. <br />9. The staff's comments on the <br />draft EI5 for the proposed S,nerv.POI <br />Hook Project, localed in the little <br />Snake River Basin of Color<ldo .'lnd <br />Wyoming, rt'qut.'sled an explanation <br />of the low salt pickup assumed for the <br />propoSM irrigatt>d aredS dnd a <br />description of possible measures that <br />would be taken to decrease the sail <br />load from the project. <br />Construction continued on the <br />Lyman Project, an irrigation project in <br />southwl"stern Wyoming. The Bureau <br />of Rfflamation awarded an $' 1 <br />million Contract for construction of <br />Stateline Dam, which is the second <br />and last of the storage dams rl"Quired <br />for this Project. <br />Construction continue1:::l on the <br />Fryinf{fJJn-Ad.msiH Project, a <br />transmountain diversion project in <br />Colorado. A $].5 million COntract was <br />awarde1:::l bv the Bureau of <br />Reclamation for the second of two <br />pump-turbine units for the Ml. Elbert <br />Pumped-Storage hydrot'lectric <br />powerplant under construction n('ar <br />leadville, Colorado. Alro, other <br />contracts totalling $15 million were <br />awarded for switchyard facilities, a <br />lransmission line, d second <br />generator-mOlOr unit, t\.\.o lunnels of <br />the North Side Collection Svstem. and <br />waler and sewer systems. <br />Construction continued during the <br />year on the Sal.njo Indian Irriflation <br />Project Conlracts totalling $12.8 <br />million \.\t>re awarded bv the Bureau <br />of Reclamation for a pipeline <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />Sorting and packing beans grown <br />in Southern CalrfOrnia. <br /> <br />distribution SySlem which will open <br />up an additional 9,900 acres of land <br />on thp Ndva;o Indian Resprvation, ior <br />two ~pnpralors at the Navajo Ddm <br />Powt'rplant, dnd for construction of <br />the NavajO Dam Powerplant and <br />Switchyard. A contract betwPen thE' <br />Navdjo Tribe and the United Slates <br />for furnishing a supply of irrigation <br />water to the Project was executed in <br />April, and irrigation commenced on <br />an initial block of 10,000 acres during <br />the vear. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation <br />awarded a $2.3 million contract for <br />the construction of access roads to <br />the sites of the- Upper Stillwater <br />Reservoir and the- lower Stillwater <br />Reservoir. which are features of the <br />Central Utah Project '5 Bonne~'t1!e <br />Unit. <br />In April 1976, the partners in the <br />proposed KJiparo~..it-, powerp!ant <br />announced the abandonment of the <br />3,000 m~awalt project, for which the <br />Utah Stale Enginet'r had approved a <br />waler rights application for 102,000 <br /> <br />acre.fet'1 per year from the Colorado <br />Riv(>r. In July, the partners announced <br />that they are considering building: a <br />coal-gasification plant at the Kane <br />Count V site that would require only <br />30,000 acre~fet:'1 pf'r Year. <br /> <br />lmler BJ.~/n DNe!opment5 <br /> <br />The BOdrd's st.lif revie\\ro the draft <br />EIS on the Sl:'Cond Stage of the <br />Southern NehJ(j.l I t'J(er Project. The <br />first stage, which began waler <br />deliveries in 1971, can deliver 132,000 <br />.lcre-fft"t per \iear. The second stage <br />would .ldd .ldditional pumping unils <br />to the existing intake facilities at lake <br />\-lead that were originally constructed <br />to full size and additional pi;:>elines <br />with a cap.lcitv of 166,80(} acre-feet <br />per yedr to bring lhe Project's lotal <br />diversion capacity from the Colorado <br />River to 299,000 acre.feet per yedr. <br />This Project and OIher existing <br />diversions would be more than <br />sufficient to divert all of Nevada's <br />apportioned rights 10 mainstream <br />Colorado River water. The estimaled <br />cost of the ~ond slage is <br />appro....imately SIlO million. <br />The staff reviewed a draft EIS on <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.