Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B<& ' <br />, ,;"j"!., <br />... ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />3. Describe processes rather than enumerate character- <br />istics; i.e., describe common interactions of food <br />chain rather than listing animals. <br /> <br />IV. Eligibility and Classification <br /> <br />A. Eligibility <br /> <br />1. Definition <br /> <br />2. Qualities of River which are applicable <br /> <br />3. Conclusion <br /> <br />B. Classification <br /> <br />1. Definition <br /> <br />2. Qualities of River which are applicable <br /> <br />3. Classification <br /> <br />V. Analysis of Alternatives <br /> <br />A. Introduction <br /> <br />1. Explain authority and nature of principle and standards <br /> <br />2. Address its application to the study <br /> <br />3. Re-state alternatives provided by Act <br /> <br />Note: Emphasize need to make comparison which gives <br />Congress economic and environmental picture of area. <br />Emphasize need to develop comparisons. These are in <br />fact comparisons and in no sense final. <br /> <br />B. Develop Component Needs <br /> <br />C. Establish Alternative Plans <br />(complementary component needs) <br /> <br />D. Effect of NED plans on NED components <br />(list assumptions) <br /> <br />E. Effect of EQ plans on EQ components <br />(list assumptions) <br /> <br />-2- <br />