Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />.... <br />00 <br />-.J <br />CO <br /> <br />the requirements of the Mexican Water Treaty constitutes a national <br /> <br />obligation. Accordingly, such legislation provides that costs of <br /> <br />construction, operation, and maintenance allocated.to the replerii~h- <br /> <br />ment of depleted Colorado River flows occasioned by compliance with <br /> <br />the Mexican Water Treaty shall be nonreimbursable. The replenish- <br /> <br />m('l1t would include losses in tra,nsit, evaporation from regulatory <br /> <br />reservoirs, and regulatory losses at the. Mexican boundllry incurred <br /> <br />in the transportation, storage, and delivery of water i.n discharge, <br /> <br />of the obligations of that treaty. <br /> <br />As discussed previously, the amount of augmentation necessary <br /> <br />to satisfy the Mexican Water Treaty will vary with the magnitude <br /> <br />of water losses on the lower Colorado River. For the plan requiring <br /> <br />2.0 m.a.f. augmentation, 1.8 m.a.f. is identified with Mexican water <br /> <br />deliveries. For the plan requiri.ng 2.5 m.a.f. augmentation, 1.93 <br /> <br />m.a.f. is id'entifi.ed with Mexican water deliveries. The costs of <br /> <br />the augmentation works are split betw'een reimbursable and non- <br /> <br />reimbursable, essentially on a pro rata basis. <br /> <br />Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund--Pending legis la- <br /> <br />tion (S. 1004, H.R. 3000, and similar bills) provides also for <br /> <br />establishment of a Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund <br /> <br />which would be a source of financial assistance to return the <br /> <br />reimbursable costs of au~nentation works. For the purposes of <br /> <br />this report, it is assumed that the following revenues i-,ccruing <br /> <br />to the Development Fund would be available to apply toward the <br /> <br />reimbursable costs of the augmentation plan: (1) the surplus <br /> <br />12 <br />