Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />page 3 WRW washn x x x asked <br /> <br />ARIZONANS ASK LUJAN FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INTERIM CRITERIA <br />Rhodes and Rep. John Kyl, R-Ariz., and staffers representing the <br />other Members in the Arizona House delegation--Chairman Morris K. <br />Udall, D-Ariz., of the House Interior Committee, Reps. Jim Kolbe, <br />R-Ariz., and Bob stump, R-Ariz.--met with Lujan on April 23 to try to <br />work out an administrative solution to problems currently plaguing <br />Grand Canyon National Park. Mainly because Glen Canyon Dam is being <br />used to produce peaking power, water releases in the Colorado River <br />are widely fluctuating--up to 13 feet, according to many of the <br />environmentalists backing the Miller bill. <br />Lujan on July 27, 1989, announced Interior is preparing an <br />environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the impacts of its <br />operations of Glen Canyon Dam on downstream resources. The EIS is <br />expected to take three years to prepare. The Miller bill would re- <br />quire the Interior Secretary to "develop and implement emergency <br />interim operating criteria for Glen Canyon Dam" operations within 90 <br />days after enactment into law. It provides the criteria "shall not <br />interfere with the primary water storage and delivery functions of <br />Glen Canyon Dam," but must minimize adverse impacts on Grand Canyon <br />National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation area by cutting <br />back on fluctuating water releases and the production of peaking <br />power. It makes protection of both park areas a major purpose of <br />CRSP. Power continues to be incidental to other project purposes. It <br />also provides for flood control and minimum stream flows to protect <br />the river's and the park's fishery resources. <br />Rhodes, Kyl and the others representing Arizona Members asked <br />Lujan to consider imposing administratively the inter im criteria <br />called for in Miller's bill, "and the Secretary said he would look <br />favorably on the idea," a source at the meeting with Lujan told WRW <br />on May 1. If Underwood had been permitted to testify by Miller, he <br />would have so informed the Miller/Vento panels. Both Underwood's and <br />Clagett's testimony was sent to the Subcommittees on April 25, but <br />the press was told their testimony was "not received in time for <br />inclusion in the press packet." Nevertheless, Underwood's testimony <br />became available to the press during the hearing. Underwood said data <br />from flows on the Colorado River marked for research are being incor- <br />porated into the EIS, and this phase of the research work will not be <br />completed until the end of July 1991. "Once these additional data are <br />in hand...we believe we will be in a position to develop interim cri- <br />teria for operation of Glen Canyon Dam," Underwood's prepared testi- <br />mony said. "Secretary Lujan has directed us to do so within 90 days <br />of the completion of the research flows. At the same time the Secre- <br />tary has directed that any interim operating criteria will not inter- <br />fere with the Department's obligations relating to the storage and <br />delivery of water. These interim flows will remain in effect until <br />the EIS is complete and a final decision made regarding the long-term <br />actions that will be taken." Among the factors to be considered in <br />developing interim operating criteria would be the impacts on river <br />regulation, reservoir uses, existing power contracts, CRSP system <br />repayment, and operating revenues, the testimony said. This was, in <br />effect, what the Arizona delegation had asked Lujan for. (more) <br />