Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CQL~RApO'RIVER .$TORAGE:PROqEqT <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />4_ PROGRESS OF RETURJ\' AND REPAYMENTOD' FEDERAL INV~STMENT <br /> <br />In fiscal year 1963 thelrepayinent of Federal investlllent began witb <br />the reoeipt of $23,900 Nom the Uintah Water Conservancy District <br />for their first annual pltyment for municipal and industrial water <br />service from the V ernallffiit of the Central Utah project. In addition, <br />miscellaneous nonopera~ing revenues totaling $39,859 have. been <br />returned to the Treasury as a repayment of Federal investment, <br />At the end of fiscal year ~963 a total of $63,759 of the Federal invest- <br />ment has thus been repaid. <br />Repayment contracts 'which schedule annual payments on irriga. <br />tion and lllunicipal and ipdustrial .water facilities have been executed <br />with water users organiz';tions on the following participating projects: <br />Central Utah, Vernal unit~Uintah Water Conservancy District, <br />July 14, 1958___________~--------------------------------:- $1,500,000 <br />Emery COl.lnty-.....,-Emery Water Conservancy District, May 15,1962__ 2, 935, 000 <br />Florida-Florida Water Cons~rvancy District, Dec. 29,-J960_~_____ I, 9QO, 000 <br />Hammond-Hammond Conservancy District, Oct. .20,1959-------- 450,000 <br />Paonia-North Fork Water Conservancy-District, Aug. 21,1957___ 2,320,000 <br />San Juan-Chamn-Middle R~o Grande Conservancy District, June <br />25, 1963______ __ _____ ____,_________________________________ 3.' 400,000 <br />City of Albuquerque, Juqe 25, 1963____;.___;.________________ 33,761,000 <br />Seedskadce-Stato of Wyomiril\t. June 14, 1962__.____"__"________900, 000 <br />Smith Fork-Crawford Water; lJonservancy Pis.trict, May 191 ~960_ 1,025,000 <br /> <br />TotaL______________"_________________________________ 48.191.000 <br /> <br />5. ESTIMATED RATE OJ!' PROJECT REPAYMENT YEAR BY YEAR <br />, <br />Final cost allocation of the Federal investlllent to power, irri~ation. <br />and to other purposes has not been lllade. Accordingly the estIlllated <br />rate of progress of projectirepaYlllent year by year of the investlllent <br />to be so allocated is not inpluded in this report. <br /> <br />