Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />L1DAR was flown over Grand Canyon in March and September of 2000 to assess its ability to provide a <br />relatively low-cost. ecosystem-wide change detection tool. Detennining the error associated with the <br />elevation values of the L1DAR points was necessary to ensure that true change in the target resource was <br />being recorded. This paper shall present the methods used to check the vertical accuracy of the LIDAR <br />points. describe the results, and offer conclusions regarding the potential utility of using L1DAR as a <br />change detection tool for monitoring downstream resources that are affected by hydropower operations. <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) of/he U.S. Geological Survey <br />studies the effects of water release from Glen Canyon Dam on the ecology of the Colorado River through <br />Grand Canyon (from Lake Powell to Lake Mead) in order to develop release protocols that minimize any <br />adverse effects on the river's ecology. One way that scientists at the GCMRC monitor downstream <br />resources is by measuring changes in sand bar size and volume that are the result of dam operations. <br />Currently. sand bar area and volume changes are repeatedly measured using conventional ground survey <br />techniques. This measurement method can be time-consuming. costly and intrusive, which may limit the <br />change detection to a small percentage of the overall ecosystem. Light Detecting and Ranging (L1DAR) <br />technology seemed to offer a potential way to evaluate sediment changes throughout the ecosystem in a <br />relatively short amount of time in a cost-effective and unintrusive manner. Before any change detection <br />could be preformed using L1DAR, the vertical error of the L1DAR data needed to be assessed to ensure <br />that L1DAR measurements were reflecting true changes in the resource and not simply vertical errors <br />between different L1DAR flights. <br /> <br />L1DAR data were acquired over the eight study reaches in late March. in late August, and in middle <br />September 2000 in order to assess changes in sandbar volume due to a spike water release by the Glen <br />Canyon Dam in early September 2000. Topographic data were obtained simultaneously from ground <br />surveys over the same river reaches. This paper assesses the vertical accuracy and precision of the <br />LIDAR points to determine if L1DAR technology provides an adequate tool for monitoring changes in <br />downstream resources. <br /> <br />Study Areas <br /> <br />The eight areas used in our evaluations are located within the upper one-third of the Colorado <br />River in Arizona (Figure I). Five of these study areas are long-term monitoring sites for sediment storage <br />(RM 2.8, RM 30, RM 43. RM 59, and RM 62.7: Figure I). [RM refers to river mile from Lee's Ferry. <br />Arizona, which is designated as RM 0.] These sites were topographically mapped by ground survey crews <br />during the L1DAR overflights in August and September 2000 and are referred to as the sandbar mapping <br />surveys. In addition. spot elevation surveys of randomly selected L1DAR points were conducted in all <br />eight study areas subsequent to the overflights; these ground surveys are referred to as stakeout surveys. <br /> <br />The five long-term monitoring sites are typically surveyed on an annual basis. With respect to <br />sediment monitoring, a change in ground elevation at any location on a sand bar is deemed significant <br />when the change exceeds 25 cm (either positive or negative: Schmidt et aI., 1999). Thus. vertical <br />(elevarion) accuracies to identify such a change need to be at least 25 cm. preferably near tbe 15 cm level. <br />Land survey methods currently employed for sediment monitoring produce vertical accuracies near 3-5 <br />cm. <br /> <br />2 <br />