Laserfiche WebLink
<br />inage Program <br /> <br />I~ <br />r~ <br />~ <br />iQ <br />I <br /> <br />The IDP report says Kern County will have about <br />100,000 acres which will need drainage by 1985, But <br />if the drain is built by the federal government with the <br />state participating in the southern portion, state water <br />contractors will have to pay significantly more than <br />federal water contractors, According to Stu Pyle, , <br />Manager of the Kern County Water Agency, "The cost <br />of a master drain is very expensive, and we do not <br />want to enter into contracts which add more expense <br />to water users down here," He agrees with theIDP <br />interim plan to rely on local collection and ponding <br />of the salty water in the Kern County area for the <br />next 20 years and says, "There is a problem, but we <br />feel it should be handled locally and doesn't require a <br />drain to the Delta. Again our people do not want to <br />underwrite costs for future construction," Pyle says <br />several thousand acres are now used for drainage <br />ponds, and this could rise eventually to 25,000 acres <br />of non-productive land, "We're not talking about <br />taking top-notch land out of production in Kern Co," <br /> <br />Environmentalists at Odds <br /> <br />Dr. Karen Tsao of the Environmental Defense Fund <br />says her group recognizes the problem but is against <br />the drain as proposed in the IDP report. "It's not a <br />question of yes or no on the drain, It's a question of <br />finding the least cost alternatives and ones that are <br />environmentally sound," She says the effects on the <br />Delta have not been fully considered nor adequately <br />modeled, She takes issue with the IDP report, saying <br />projected effluent is assumed to grow rapidly while <br />the report doesn't give figures on how the effluent <br />load delivered to the Delta was derived. If the efflu- <br />ent load is determined on the amount of farmland go- <br />inginto production, she says, "DWR's estimates vary <br />greatly, over five times, between the least and the <br />largest amounts of land they think will go into pro- <br />duction in the San Joaquin Valley by the year 2020," <br />The Environmental Defense Fund is dissatisfied with <br />Assemblyman Thurman's standards law, Tsao says, <br />because the law focuses attention exclusively on the <br />drain as proposed and avoids consideration of alterna- <br />tives, <br /> <br />Dan Chapin, Chairman of the California Waterfowl <br />Association, served as Vice Chairman of the Inter- <br />agency Drainage Committee's Public Advisory Com- <br />mittee. Chapin points out two alternative methods of <br />solving the salt buildup problem in the valley, The <br />first, he says, is by collecting the drainage water in <br />evaporation ponds and transporting the resulting solid <br /> <br />salt to its final disposition point. The second is by <br />constructing the drain to convey the brine to its ulti- <br />mate destination, "Either alternative could provide <br />important waterfowl benefits, but the drain concept <br />offers much greater opportunity to establish addition- <br />al productive marshes, "Therefore, its potential bene- <br />fits for the ducks are clearly better," Chapin says, He <br />also feels that the terminus of a drain can be located <br />where it will not have an adverse impact on the impor- <br />tant wetlands of the Suisun Marsh, Notingthat the <br />salinity of the drain water varies from 5 to 15 parts <br />per thousand (sea water is 35 parts per thousand), <br />Chapin points out, "A drain discharge to Suisun Bay <br />as far west as Benicia would actually be fresher than <br />the 15 to 25 parts per thousand water prevalent there, <br />Conversely, a discharge at Antioch could severely de- <br />grade the quality of water found in that area," How- <br />ever, he has reservations about a Chipps Island dis- <br />charge location. "While the mathematical model used <br />to identify that site was the best available at the time, <br />it had some serious limitations." Chapin claims. "For- <br />tunately, the Bureau of Reclamation studies required <br />by the SWRCB before they issue a drain permit will <br />have to address that point specifically," <br />The state DFG supports a comprehensive valley <br />drain as proposed in Thurman's standards law. Dick <br />Daniel, Staff Biologist of DFG says, "It (the valley <br />drain) recognizes the opportunity to utilize drainage <br />water for the development and maintenance of marsh <br />habitat-a highly productive and valuable habitat type <br />which has been greatly diminished in the state." <br />Daniel says the Thurman act reiterates and strengthens <br />existing environmental safeguards of discharge to the <br />Delta while at the same time providing the opportunity <br />to accomplish something for agriculture and achieve <br />added benefit for people through the restoration of <br />valley marshland, Daniel notes, "We believe the tech- <br />nolOgy exists to make the drain safe for the environ- <br />ment, but if future data shows the effluent to be <br />harmful to the Delta or Bay, DFG would be opposed, <br />to the drain discharge," <br /> <br />The eventual construction of a valley-wide drain is <br />seen by Lou Beck, DWR's Chief of the San Joaquin <br />District, who says he believes state water contractors <br />will be forced to sign contracts agreeing to pay for the <br />drain, But he says this won't happen for years until <br />the situation worsens or a semi-disaster occurs, "I'm <br />convinced," Beck says, "The Bureau will build the <br />northern extension to the Delta by 1986, Once that's <br />done, the state could come in as early as the 1990's'''. <br /> <br />11 <br />