<br />inage Program
<br />
<br />I~
<br />r~
<br />~
<br />iQ
<br />I
<br />
<br />The IDP report says Kern County will have about
<br />100,000 acres which will need drainage by 1985, But
<br />if the drain is built by the federal government with the
<br />state participating in the southern portion, state water
<br />contractors will have to pay significantly more than
<br />federal water contractors, According to Stu Pyle, ,
<br />Manager of the Kern County Water Agency, "The cost
<br />of a master drain is very expensive, and we do not
<br />want to enter into contracts which add more expense
<br />to water users down here," He agrees with theIDP
<br />interim plan to rely on local collection and ponding
<br />of the salty water in the Kern County area for the
<br />next 20 years and says, "There is a problem, but we
<br />feel it should be handled locally and doesn't require a
<br />drain to the Delta. Again our people do not want to
<br />underwrite costs for future construction," Pyle says
<br />several thousand acres are now used for drainage
<br />ponds, and this could rise eventually to 25,000 acres
<br />of non-productive land, "We're not talking about
<br />taking top-notch land out of production in Kern Co,"
<br />
<br />Environmentalists at Odds
<br />
<br />Dr. Karen Tsao of the Environmental Defense Fund
<br />says her group recognizes the problem but is against
<br />the drain as proposed in the IDP report. "It's not a
<br />question of yes or no on the drain, It's a question of
<br />finding the least cost alternatives and ones that are
<br />environmentally sound," She says the effects on the
<br />Delta have not been fully considered nor adequately
<br />modeled, She takes issue with the IDP report, saying
<br />projected effluent is assumed to grow rapidly while
<br />the report doesn't give figures on how the effluent
<br />load delivered to the Delta was derived. If the efflu-
<br />ent load is determined on the amount of farmland go-
<br />inginto production, she says, "DWR's estimates vary
<br />greatly, over five times, between the least and the
<br />largest amounts of land they think will go into pro-
<br />duction in the San Joaquin Valley by the year 2020,"
<br />The Environmental Defense Fund is dissatisfied with
<br />Assemblyman Thurman's standards law, Tsao says,
<br />because the law focuses attention exclusively on the
<br />drain as proposed and avoids consideration of alterna-
<br />tives,
<br />
<br />Dan Chapin, Chairman of the California Waterfowl
<br />Association, served as Vice Chairman of the Inter-
<br />agency Drainage Committee's Public Advisory Com-
<br />mittee. Chapin points out two alternative methods of
<br />solving the salt buildup problem in the valley, The
<br />first, he says, is by collecting the drainage water in
<br />evaporation ponds and transporting the resulting solid
<br />
<br />salt to its final disposition point. The second is by
<br />constructing the drain to convey the brine to its ulti-
<br />mate destination, "Either alternative could provide
<br />important waterfowl benefits, but the drain concept
<br />offers much greater opportunity to establish addition-
<br />al productive marshes, "Therefore, its potential bene-
<br />fits for the ducks are clearly better," Chapin says, He
<br />also feels that the terminus of a drain can be located
<br />where it will not have an adverse impact on the impor-
<br />tant wetlands of the Suisun Marsh, Notingthat the
<br />salinity of the drain water varies from 5 to 15 parts
<br />per thousand (sea water is 35 parts per thousand),
<br />Chapin points out, "A drain discharge to Suisun Bay
<br />as far west as Benicia would actually be fresher than
<br />the 15 to 25 parts per thousand water prevalent there,
<br />Conversely, a discharge at Antioch could severely de-
<br />grade the quality of water found in that area," How-
<br />ever, he has reservations about a Chipps Island dis-
<br />charge location. "While the mathematical model used
<br />to identify that site was the best available at the time,
<br />it had some serious limitations." Chapin claims. "For-
<br />tunately, the Bureau of Reclamation studies required
<br />by the SWRCB before they issue a drain permit will
<br />have to address that point specifically,"
<br />The state DFG supports a comprehensive valley
<br />drain as proposed in Thurman's standards law. Dick
<br />Daniel, Staff Biologist of DFG says, "It (the valley
<br />drain) recognizes the opportunity to utilize drainage
<br />water for the development and maintenance of marsh
<br />habitat-a highly productive and valuable habitat type
<br />which has been greatly diminished in the state."
<br />Daniel says the Thurman act reiterates and strengthens
<br />existing environmental safeguards of discharge to the
<br />Delta while at the same time providing the opportunity
<br />to accomplish something for agriculture and achieve
<br />added benefit for people through the restoration of
<br />valley marshland, Daniel notes, "We believe the tech-
<br />nolOgy exists to make the drain safe for the environ-
<br />ment, but if future data shows the effluent to be
<br />harmful to the Delta or Bay, DFG would be opposed,
<br />to the drain discharge,"
<br />
<br />The eventual construction of a valley-wide drain is
<br />seen by Lou Beck, DWR's Chief of the San Joaquin
<br />District, who says he believes state water contractors
<br />will be forced to sign contracts agreeing to pay for the
<br />drain, But he says this won't happen for years until
<br />the situation worsens or a semi-disaster occurs, "I'm
<br />convinced," Beck says, "The Bureau will build the
<br />northern extension to the Delta by 1986, Once that's
<br />done, the state could come in as early as the 1990's'''.
<br />
<br />11
<br />
|