My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11887
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:15:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8549.100
Description
Rio Grande Water Supply Study
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1990
Author
Leonard Rice Consult
Title
Final Report - Rio Grande Water Supply Study - Phase I -
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />00 <br />"l::I'l <br />t'- <br />C\l <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />100,000 acre-feet (af) per year. <br /> <br />The Closed Basin Project deliveries are <br /> <br />categorized by type of use as fOllows: <br /> <br />Priority One - <br /> <br />deliveries made to assist the State of COlorado in <br /> <br /> <br />meeting its Compact commitments to New Mexico and Texas. <br /> <br />Priority One deliveries are limited to an average 60,000 <br /> <br /> <br />acre-feet/year over any 10 consecutive years. <br /> <br />deliveries made to enhance wildlife in the Alamosa <br /> <br />Priority Two - <br /> <br />National Wildlife Refuge and Blanca Wildlife Habitat <br />Area. Priority Two deliveries are limited to 5,300 af <br /> <br />annually. <br /> <br />For the Rio Grande Water Supply Study, <br /> <br />Priority Two deliveries were assumed to not contribute <br /> <br /> <br />flow to the Rio Grande and, therefore, were not modeled. <br /> <br />Priority Tbree - deliveries available at a charge for general use by Rio <br /> <br /> <br />Grande and Conejos water users after Priority One and <br /> <br />Priority Two uses have been satisfied. In any given <br /> <br /> <br />year, water available for Priority Three delivery will <br /> <br />depend on the amount of Priority One and Priority Two <br /> <br />water delivered. Priority Three water (as defined in <br /> <br />this study) was described as Priority Four water in the <br /> <br />authorizing legislation for the Closed Basin Project. <br /> <br />For each of the two mainstem diversion scenarios, Closed Basin Project deliveries <br /> <br /> <br />for Priority One and Priority Three water were developed. <br /> <br />The Closed Basin Project Priority One deliveries were estimated to alleviate as <br /> <br />much Compact curtailment of the mainstem diversions as possible while satisfying <br /> <br />various operating guidelines of the Closed Basin Project. Most of the Priority <br /> <br /> <br />One deliveries were generated for average or above average runoff years since <br /> <br />those are the years in which Colorado has the greatest Compact obligations. <br /> <br />, <br />Priority One deliveries were limited to an average of 60,000 af per year in any <br /> <br />ten year period or 94,500 af in anyone year. <br /> <br /> <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.