My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11884
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11884
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:11 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:15:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/9/1954
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />was built as a separate part of the project with the cost being charged <br />entirely to Salt Lake City. <br /> <br />From the Weber River surplus water and power water, and the <br />Duchesne Tunnel, we get 102, 000 acre feet which is about our average <br />annual anticipated yield of the reservoir. As the program is set up, <br />100,000 acre feet is all that will be sold each year. The rest will be for <br />holdover storage capacity in the reservoir. We had exceptionally high <br />water in 1952, but since that time the runoff has continued dry and drier <br />until this year from the Weber, where we had anticipated the annual average <br />yield of 54,000 acre feet, we received none. So most of our water this <br />year has been from the Duchesne, which is a tributary of the Colorado <br />River. If the drouth continues to the extent that that river is more <br />affected and should it be affected to anywhere near the extent that the <br />other rivers in the State have, then we just haven't the water to deliver. <br /> <br />The prospects for 1955, with the carry-over water in the reservoir, <br />are that we'll have ample water for 100"/0 delivery this year, but after our <br />use this year, we will have approximately 40, 000 acre feet in our <br />reservoir. The Metropolitan Water Users of Salt Lake City, who have <br />been concerned about the supply, have conserved as much as they could <br />this year and are holding over 24,000 acre feet of water, which will be <br />ample for next year, but the irrigators under the project will use all <br />their water this year. So if we proceed on the same basis and the drouth <br />continues for another year as it has the past year, we will not have the <br />water to deliver. <br /> <br />Conservation of water on the farms has started with the installa- <br />tion of sprinkler systems. They feel that with sprinklers they can <br />irrigate possibly three acres to one by row irrigation. Many farmers <br />are considering this method very seriously so that they can produce crops <br />on less water. <br /> <br /> <br />Our interest in the drouth conditions of the Colorado River Basin <br />is that 500/0 of our Project's water comes from the Colorado River Basin <br />and we could not exist without that water. <br /> <br />Mr. E Ide r : There won't be any additional dust in our Southern <br />California coastal area if the Colorado River drouth continues another <br />year or two. That doesn't mean that we won't have a lot of dust over <br />there. Most of you know that we go seven or eight months in a normal <br />wet year in California without any rain, but in this case it won't be due <br />to continued drouth in the Colorado River Basin. By way of explanation, <br />the water diversions now being made and which have been made for the <br />last fourteen years from Hoover Dam constitute a supplemental supply. <br />Every year this diversion has increased to supply growing demands. <br /> <br />_ 23 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.