Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 2.0 Description of Alternatives 11 <br /> <br /> <br />01193 <br /> <br />TABLE 2.2-Monthly water volumes for sediment input scenarios 1 <br />MonthlY ear Base Case Scenarios 1, 2, <br /> Water (T AF) and 3 Water (TAF) <br />Sediment Input <br />Year 1 <br />Oct. 2002 600 492 <br />Nov. 2002 600 476 <br />Dec. 2002 800 492 <br />Jan. 2003 800 839 <br />Feb. 2003 600 730 <br />March 2003 600 810 <br />April 2003 600 600 <br />May 2003 600 600 <br />June 2003 630 650 <br />July 2003 850 870 <br />August 2003 900 870 <br />Sept. 2003 650 801 <br />Total Year 1 8,230 8,230 <br />Sediment Input Scenario 4 Water <br />Year 2 (TAF) <br />Oct. 2003 600 600 <br />Nov. 2003 600 600 <br />Dec. 2003 800 800 <br />Jan. 2004 800 854 <br />Feb. 2004 800 748 <br />March 2004 650 810 <br />April 2004 600 600 <br />May 2004 800 800 <br />June 2004 900 878 <br />July 2004 1,050 1,000 <br />August 2004 1.050 1,000 <br />Sept. 2004 950 910 <br />Total Year 2 9,600 9.600 <br /> <br />1. Minor adjustments were made to monthly volumes in water year 2002 through the AQP process to allow for the <br />potential initiation of the Proposed Action if Paria River sediment inputs occurred and environmental compliance was <br />completed. This had no effect on the annual release volume from Glen Canyon Dam. <br />