WSP11875 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I: y ~ 1998 PROGRESS REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLEN CANYON DAM OPERATIONS BIOLOGICAL OPINION ,I i.. ~ '.:., This is Reclamation's third progress report for implementation of the RPA for the 1994 Glen Canyon Dam Operations Biological Opinion. Each review included at least one meeting between the staffs of Reclamation and the Service. The first progress report was prepared on November 27, 1996, and the Service formally responded in April 1997. The second report was completed on December 5,1997, with no formal response received from the Service. .. '" - As of the end of 1998, five of the seven elements of the biological opinion are ongoing, with one item completed and another awaiting followup action by the Service. Following is a discussion of each element. ~~. ~-': ,.,; ELEMENT 1 Reclamation shall develop an adaptive management program (AMP.) ~;~ ;~~ PROGRESS ELEMENT 1 The Record of Decision for the Operations of Glen Canyon Dam was signed on October 9, 1996, formally sanctioning the preferred altemative as described in the EIS, including the AMP and establishment of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC.) Through the efforts of the interim Transition Work Group, work on the AMP continued until a charter was developed and put into place establishing the Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG.) The AMWG now operates as a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC,) with Mr. Steve Magnussen appointed as the Secretary of the Interior's designee. FAC members have been designated for the 25 participants, and the first AMWG meeting was held during September 1997. The AMWG established a Technical Work Group, which has been meeting regularly since September 1997. A Science Advisory Board, providing independent scientific review of the AMP, will begin work in 1999. ~ ;.~ .; ;:~. ,).."". t;.~ :.,~ ~:;;.. .:';~; Specific management objectives and prioritized information needs for endangered species affected by operations of Glen Canyon Dam have been developed by the Technical Work Group and adopted by the Adaptive Management Work Group. The objectives and information needs are interlded to help define measurable standards of desired conditions for each endangered species and come directly from the RPA, reasonable and prudent measures (RPM,) conservation measures, and incidental take statements in the 1994 opinion, and from measures and take statements in the 1996 and 1997 opinions. The objectives and information needs also provide the basis for the long-term monitoring and research program for endangered species. On April 23, 1998, fourteen stakeholders from the Adaptive Management Program met and developed scheduling priorities for information needs. The results indicate a concem to focus in areas of biology, especially endangered species. The prioritization was approved by the AMWG in July 199B. The GCMRC will use that information in programming monitoring and research from FY2000-2004. . ~~1~ .; ~~ ;:)fJ ;,\{ ~~ F-l:, , . ~ -.'. ~~: J"} ;<1; ~~~) .~ ~ ;~ -;-.,- ~:i., ' STATUS OF ELEMENT 1 COMPLETED. The AMP has been developed and implemented. I