Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GREAT BASIN -- Continued <br /> <br />have increased the expected April-July runoff volumes in <br />the Humboldt River Basin to 245 percent of normsI. High <br />Inf lows to both Utah Lake and the Great Salt lake are <br />likely to push these large boMes of water to higher <br />levels than last yesr, and to levels not experienced In <br />almost a century. <br /> <br />February precipitation was generally near or above <br />normal over the western half of Utah and eastern Nevada. <br />and below normal along the east slope of the Sierras. <br />Amounts ranged from 150 percent in the northeast to less <br />than 50 percent in the southeast. Seasonal <br />precipitation, October through February, is generally 130 <br />to 170 percent over most of the state except the extreme <br />Bouthern areas which are less than BO percent. <br /> <br />Snowfall dudng February was generally below normal <br />with most snowpack percentages decreasing 5 to 15 <br />percent. Some average basin water contents as a percent <br />of normal include: Bear River, 134 percent; Weber, 138 <br />percent; Ugden, 164 percent; Provo, 124 percent; Upper <br />Sevier, 112 percent; Lower Sevier, 168 percent; Beaver, <br />157 percent; Humboldt. 227 percent, and East Slope <br />Sierras, 120 percent. <br /> <br />Observed streamflow continues to reflect the saturated <br />soil conditions and high base f low. Six out .of the seven <br />index stations throughout Utah during the cold February <br />were running between 150 to 200 percent of normal. The <br />combined contents of 23 reservoirs in Utah is 3.5 million <br />acre-feet, 130 percent of average and 87 percent of <br />capacity. This storage is similar to last year but more <br />space has been made available on the Weber and Odgen <br />drainages this year. <br /> <br />The elevation of the Great Salt Lake on Harch 1 was <br />4,206.70 feet MSL. This is 4.45 feet higher than last <br />year at this time and is expected to peak at 4.208.00 to <br />4,209.00 feet HSL early this summer. Utah Lake dropped <br />0.16 feet since February I and is now 3.2 feet above <br />compromise, 1. 7 feet higher than last year, and is <br />expected to rise between 5 and 6 feet above compromise <br />this spring. <br /> <br />The flood potential for this spring snowmelt continues <br />to look threatening. April through July forecasts <br />indicate volumetric amounts only slightly less than those <br />experienced last year. Spring weather will play a <br />significant role in the extent of the spring flooding. A <br />dry and mild temperature pattern would dramatically <br />reduce the flood potential but a cold wet pattern, like <br />last year, would produce critical runoff conditions. <br /> <br />With the onset of melt from abundant low elevation <br />snow. saturated soils and impending spring rains, valley <br />residents should be alert to aome pooling of water in <br />poor drainage areas and the possibility of basement <br />flooding. Also, the threat of rock and mud sUdes are <br />still very real during the next several months and <br />susceptible areas should be watched ciosely. <br /> <br />COLORADO BASIN <br /> <br />The Water supply outlook is generally for above normal <br />runoff, 125 to 155 percent. for the Colorado River above <br />Lake Powell. However. the lower Colorado River in <br />Arizona is much below normal with forecast flows less <br />than 50 percent throughout the Salt. Gila, and Little <br />Colorado drainages. Streamflow forecasts above Lake <br />Powell dropped 10 to 20 percent from those issued <br />February 1 as a result of another dry month. <br /> <br />Precipitation during February was generally less than <br />50 percent over the Colorado Basin with most of Arizona <br />receiving none at all. A few areas in the Gunnison <br />drainage and some headwater areas of the Green River had <br />near normal amounts. Seasonal precipitation, October <br />through February. ranges from below normal. 50 to 80 <br />percent in central Arizona and portions of the San Juan <br />Basin, to greater than ISO percent in portions of western <br />Colorado and southwest Wyoming. <br /> <br />February snowfall was only SO to 80 percent of normal <br />in the Upper Colorado. Ouring the last two months. sno'W <br />surveya lnd~cate a significant reduction in the average <br />basin snow water content in relation to normal. Some <br />average basin snowpacks include: Upper Colorado <br />mainstem, 139 percent; Gunnison. 144 percent; San Juan <br />Basin, 120 percent; Yampa River, 115 percent; and the <br />Upper Green River, 83 percent. Host of the snow on the <br />Arizona watersheds is gone. <br /> <br />High solI saturation and baseflow conditions in the <br />Upper Colorado are well evidenced by the winter <br />streamflow on both the Green River and Colorado River. <br />Since October I, the flow on the Green River has been 1.3 <br />million acre-feet, 205 percent of average, the highest <br />flow on record dating back to 19l1. Inflow to Lake <br />Powell for the winter period. December through February, <br />has been 1.59 million acre-feet, 1'& percent, the highest <br />on record. <br /> <br />Reservoir storage remains high with the combined <br />storage of ten major reservoirs above Lake Powell of 0.2 <br />million acre-feet, 70 percent of capacity, 151 percent of <br />average and nearly the same storage as last year at this <br />time. Storage in Lake Powell is n.5 million acre-feet, <br />86 percent of capacity. about 750,000 acre-feet lower <br />than last year at this time. The April-July inflow <br />forecast to Lake Powell is 11.3 mllion acre-feet, 151 <br />percent of the 20-year average, 1961-1980. <br /> <br />RIO GRANDE BASIN <br /> <br />The water supply outlook for the Rio Grand Basin is <br />for snowmelt runoff to range from near normal up to 100 <br />percent of average. <br /> <br />Precipitation for the month of February was much below <br />normal over all but isolated areas of the basin. Near to <br />slightly above normal alllOunts were reported in the <br />extreme upper reaches of the basin in Colorado around Rio <br />Grande Reservoir and near 1.5 times normal around Red <br />River in New Mexico. No measureable precipitation was <br />observed at many of the reporting stations in the <br />southern half of New Mexico. Seasonal totals (October <br />through February) have now decreased to range from 60 to <br />120 percent of normal in the Colorado portion of the <br />basin, and 50 to 140 percent of normal in New Mexico, <br />but near twice normal at Roswell in the Pecos Basin. <br /> <br />Basin snowpacks observed around the first of March <br />continued above normal for this time of the year but have <br />decreased 10 to 40 percent from last month. In the <br />Colorado portion of the basin the snowpack is 122 percent <br />of normal and 129 percent of last year at this time. The <br />New Mexico snowpack is 133 percent of normal and 105 <br />percent of last year. <br /> <br />Reservoir storage <br />about 166 percent of <br />232 percent of normal <br />are about the same <br />February. <br /> <br />continues well above average with <br />normal in storage in Colorado and <br />in New Mexico. The storage amounts <br />as observed around the first of <br /> <br />ARKANSAS BASIN <br /> <br />The Arkansas River water supply outlook for the <br />current season indicates above normal runoff for all of <br />the basin. Runoff amounts are expected to range from 125 <br />to 160 percent of the 20-year (1961-1980) average. <br /> <br />February precipitation totals were above normal near <br />the New Mexico border but below normal over the rest of <br />the basin. October through February seasonal totals now <br />range from 1.5 to 2 times normal to only half normal in <br />the southeast. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />First of March snowpacks were above normal over ail <br />the basin but percentages were down slighrly from a month <br />ago north of Salida and unchanged or slightly increased <br />to the south. Total basin snowpack now averages about <br /> <br />....continued on page 6 <br />