Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br />I <br /> <br />a. Alternative one L1 <br /> <br />This alternative will alter or change the least arne, t of acres of <br />habitat of any of the alternatives. ' <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />brought about by <br />I <br /> <br />The aspen wildlife habitats are altered by 202 aqres, cottonwood <br />riparian by 86 acres, Douglas fir by 117 acres, ~el oak by 25 <br />acres, mountain grassland by 415 acres, pomer~sa pine by 25 <br />acres, spruce-fir by 134 acres, wet meadow by 396 *cres and barren <br />areas are changed to 570 acres. i <br />i <br /> <br />The acres of habitat shown to be rE!llaining for leach structural <br />stage are considered after the alternative ~as been fully <br />implemented. Since it may take twenty to thirty, years to fully <br />implement Alternative One, there will be sane Iyears when the <br />acreage for various habitats available will be between those shown <br />for the various alternatives. I <br /> <br />The developnent on private lam for Alternative <jlne is different <br />fran the developnent on private land in Alternatives Two or Three <br />in the following ways: l) the ski area base facillities would not <br />be present, 2) the realignrrent of U.S Highway 160 I'WOUld not occur, <br />3) the village center would not be developed at a: density as high <br />as in Alternatives Two or Three, and 4) ther~ would be sane <br />additional low density housing lots put in n~ar pods 60 and <br />67-74. OITerall the impacts on amount of habitat lWOuld be similar <br />but impacts on wildlife (discussed later) would pe much less due <br />to fewer human inhabitants in the valley. I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The major changes to wildlife habitats <br />Alternative One are shown in Table IV-17. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Alternative Two <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />, <br />This alternative will alter or modify the greatest number of acres <br />of vegetation and therefore cause changes to the ~argest amount of <br />wildlife habitat. The major changes to wildlifelhabitats brought <br />about by Alternative Two are sha-In in Table IV-l7j- <br /> <br />The aspen wildlife habitats receive 558 acres ofl change, mountain <br />grassland changes by 1019 acres, Douglas fir ch~ges by l44 acres, <br />spruce-fir changes by 390 acres, wet meadow ch~ges by 396 acres <br />and barren changes by 605 acres. I <br />i <br />The acres of habitat shown to be remaining fot each structural <br />stage are considered after the alternative I has been fully <br />implemented. Since it may take twenty to thir~y years to fully <br />implement Alternative Two, there will be san, years when the <br />acreage of various habitats available will be bEltween those shCMn <br />for the various alternatives. I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />200 <br />