My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11863
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11863
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:14:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
8/1/1986
Author
USFS
Title
Wolf Creek Valley Ski Area - Revised Draft - Environmental Impact Statement - San Juan National Forest - 1986 - Chapter IV to end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i <br />I <br /> <br />a. Alternative one L1 <br /> <br />This alternative will alter or change the least arne, t of acres of <br />habitat of any of the alternatives. ' <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />brought about by <br />I <br /> <br />The aspen wildlife habitats are altered by 202 aqres, cottonwood <br />riparian by 86 acres, Douglas fir by 117 acres, ~el oak by 25 <br />acres, mountain grassland by 415 acres, pomer~sa pine by 25 <br />acres, spruce-fir by 134 acres, wet meadow by 396 *cres and barren <br />areas are changed to 570 acres. i <br />i <br /> <br />The acres of habitat shown to be rE!llaining for leach structural <br />stage are considered after the alternative ~as been fully <br />implemented. Since it may take twenty to thirty, years to fully <br />implement Alternative One, there will be sane Iyears when the <br />acreage for various habitats available will be between those shown <br />for the various alternatives. I <br /> <br />The developnent on private lam for Alternative <jlne is different <br />fran the developnent on private land in Alternatives Two or Three <br />in the following ways: l) the ski area base facillities would not <br />be present, 2) the realignrrent of U.S Highway 160 I'WOUld not occur, <br />3) the village center would not be developed at a: density as high <br />as in Alternatives Two or Three, and 4) ther~ would be sane <br />additional low density housing lots put in n~ar pods 60 and <br />67-74. OITerall the impacts on amount of habitat lWOuld be similar <br />but impacts on wildlife (discussed later) would pe much less due <br />to fewer human inhabitants in the valley. I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The major changes to wildlife habitats <br />Alternative One are shown in Table IV-17. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Alternative Two <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />, <br />This alternative will alter or modify the greatest number of acres <br />of vegetation and therefore cause changes to the ~argest amount of <br />wildlife habitat. The major changes to wildlifelhabitats brought <br />about by Alternative Two are sha-In in Table IV-l7j- <br /> <br />The aspen wildlife habitats receive 558 acres ofl change, mountain <br />grassland changes by 1019 acres, Douglas fir ch~ges by l44 acres, <br />spruce-fir changes by 390 acres, wet meadow ch~ges by 396 acres <br />and barren changes by 605 acres. I <br />i <br />The acres of habitat shown to be remaining fot each structural <br />stage are considered after the alternative I has been fully <br />implemented. Since it may take twenty to thir~y years to fully <br />implement Alternative Two, there will be san, years when the <br />acreage of various habitats available will be bEltween those shCMn <br />for the various alternatives. I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />200 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.