My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11852
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Briefing Documents-History-Correspondence
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1999
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Programmatic Environmental Assessment-Rulemaking-Offstream Storage Colorado River Water - Development-Release Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment - Lower Division States - Appendix H-Section I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1\I",:".o3'~ , <br />uuu 0-" <br /> <br />Comment: Oirstream storage of surplus water will decrease the likelihood that water from <br />flood control releases will reach the Gulf of California, thereby reducing the quantity of water that <br />othetwise would be available for environmental restoration in the delta. <br /> <br />Response: Flood control releases are projected to average 788 kaflyear during the period <br />1999-2015. Oirstream storage could decrease flood control releases reaching Mexico by an <br />average of23 kaf/year during this time. The probability of occurrence offlood control releases <br />could decrease by 0.83 percent. These decreases fall within the range offlood control projections <br />previously consulted on in the 1996 Biological Assessment of Operations, Maintenance, and <br />Sensitive Species of the Lower Colorado River. <br /> <br />Please refer to the previous discussion of adequacy of the environmental assessment under <br />the Environmental Concerns section of the Public Comments on Proposed Rule and Responses <br />to General Issues. <br /> <br />Efficiencv ImDrovements <br /> <br />Comment: Efficiency improvements in river management and the storage of Colorado <br />River water in underground aquifers mean less water is available for environmental purposes, such <br />as the riparian and aquatic ecosystems of the river, including the river and delta region in Mexico. <br /> <br />Response: Please refer to the previous discussion of efficiency improvements under <br />Public Comments on Proposed Rule and Responses on General Issues, <br /> <br />Storaee Alternatives <br /> <br />Comment: It is not clear what storage options are available under the rule, or how the <br />rule would apply if there are changes in Arizona's laws or if California or Nevada enact <br />conflicting laws. <br /> <br />Response: The Department has modified this final rule in response to comments from <br />several State agencies, a water district, and a water authority. This final rule now provides in <br />~ 414.3(a)(2) and ~ 414.3(a)(3), respectively, for the storage of basic or surplus apportionment of <br />the Storing State, not othetwise put to use by entitlement holders within the Storing State, or <br />storage of the unused basic or surplus apportionment of the Consuming State. Ifunused <br />apportionment from the Consuming State is to be stored under a Storage and Interstate Release <br />Agreement, the rule provides that the Secretary will make that water available to the storing entity <br />in accordance with the terms of a Storage and Interstate Release Agreement and will not make <br />that water available to other entitlement holders, The final rule has been drafted to apply <br />uniformly to all three Lower Division States and the Department will not speculate about potential <br />changes in Arizona's laws or whether California or Nevada may enact conflicting laws, <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.