My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11852
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Briefing Documents-History-Correspondence
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1999
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Programmatic Environmental Assessment-Rulemaking-Offstream Storage Colorado River Water - Development-Release Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment - Lower Division States - Appendix H-Section I
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-00'0352 <br /> <br />Lower Division States must plan to live within the apportionments made to them under the "Law <br />of the River." <br /> <br />Response: The Department agrees with this suggestion from a State Agency to clarifY <br />that this final rule is deemed to be within but does not expand the Secretary's authority. The <br />preamble to this final rule includes a section to provide further explanation of the purpose of this <br />part. This final rule is not intended to change or expand the Secretary's authorities under the <br />"Law of the River." This final rule is intended to facilitate more efficient use of unused <br />apportionment and surpluses within the "Law of the River" in the Lower Division States. <br /> <br />The Department also believes that this rule, in conjunction with the implementation of the <br />California 4.4 Plan and the development of surplus criteria, will provide a framework for the <br />Lower Division States to hold consumption within the apportionments for use within those States. <br /> <br />Comment: Conform this section of the rule with previous changes that delete the <br />reference to the term, "redemption of storage credits." <br /> <br />Response: The Department has adopted this change, suggested by several entities, <br />including State agencies, a water authority, and a water district, As discussed previously, this final <br />rule will provide for offstream storage of Colorado River water in a Storing State, the subsequent <br />development ofICUA by the storing entity for release by the Secretary to a consuming entity, and <br />the recovery of the stored water for use in the Storing State. <br /> <br />Comment: Delete the reference to Article I1(B)(6) of the Decree in the first sentence <br />under S 414.3(a) because the Decree does not cite a legal authority for entering into Interstate <br />Storage Agreements (now termed "Storage and Interstate Release Agreements"). <br /> <br />Response: The Department agrees that "Storage and Interstate Release Agreements" are <br />not referenced in the Decree and has modified S 414.3(a) of the rule. However, Article I1(B)(6) <br />of the Decree provides authority for the Secretary to (1) make an annual detennination under this <br />final rule of the availability ofICUA and (2) release any such water in accordance with the terms <br />of a Storage and Interstate Release Agreement. <br /> <br />Comment: Delete the last sentence of S 414.3(a), which reads, "An Interstate Storage <br />Agreement (now termed an "Storage and Interstate Release Agreement") will allow a storing <br />entity to store unused entitlement and/or unused apportionment for the credit of an authorized <br />entity located in a Consuming State and will provide for the subsequent redemption of the credit." <br /> <br />Response: The Department agrees with this comment from a State agency and has <br />modified this final rule to incorporate this change. <br /> <br />Comment: A senior priority holder in California should not be allowed to agree to make <br />available unused apportionment for storage in another State without first obtaining the agreement <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.