Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />0025J9 <br /> <br />Sl1!lKARY <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to determine the value oC electric power in <br />Colorado and to aasess the eCfects on the production of small-scale <br />hydroelectric power in Colorado of possible increases in streamflow <br />resulting from cloud seeding. Small-scale production (less thsn 80 <br />megswatts) is important to Colorado because many oC the state's mountain <br />and Western Slope.streams provide suitable small-scale sites. Also, the <br />U.S. Congress recently passed legialation that provides economic <br />incentives to producers of small-scale hydroelectric power. <br /> <br />The .Value of Electric Power in Colorado <br /> <br />Since the market Cor electric power in Colorado is regulated (mainly by <br />the Colorado Public .Utilities Commission), the value of power is not <br />determined by the usual market .forces. To place a value on power we <br />examine wholesale markets and estimate costs of supplying power if the <br />utilities supply it themselves. We conclude that the value oC power in <br />Colorado rangea between about 1.4 and 12.0 cents per kilowatt hour, <br />depending on the circumstances in which the energy is produced and used. <br /> <br />.Small-Scale Hydro in Colorado <br /> <br />A number of developers of-amall-scale hydroelectric sites have responded <br />to the incentives of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978 <br />(PURPA) and have begun to develop facilities in Colorado. No sites hsve <br />yet been completed, however, and technical details on most sites are <br />scarce. 'Kuch development activity was temporarily suspended when PURPA <br />was tied up in Cederal courts from early 1982 until mid-1983, but the <br />resolution of key iasues in favor of amall power.producers has again <br />given a puah to small-scale. .power production in the state. <br /> <br />A survey of permit applications fUed with the Federal Energy Regulatory <br />Commisaion (fERC) reveals that four general types of facilities have been <br />proposed for Colorado: dams, irrigation ditches, run-of-river and water <br />treatment. The ~otal potential ~apacitY reflected in the FERC <br />applications is 343.6 JIlW. If this capacity were developed, it would <br />increase the state's total generation capability by about six percent and <br />hydro capacity by more than 68 percent. Viewed another way, the <br />potential capacity of the proposed small-scale hydro sites in Colorado is <br />approximatelY that required to serve Colorado Springs, the state's <br />second-largest. city. <br /> <br />Possible Effects oC Cloud Seeding on Small-Scale Hydropower Production <br /> <br />Two proposed. small-scale hydroelectric projects were selected for study: <br /> <br />o a "run-of-river" installation on the North fork oC the San <br />Kiguel River planned by the city of Telluride, and <br /> <br />o a turbine on the frying Pan River at Reudi Reservoir that the <br />City of Aspen plans to install. <br /> <br />i <br />