Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />o <br />.:") <br />~ <br /><::J <br />Cf:) <br />~ <br /> <br />DEPLETION OF SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />September 30, 1950, averaged about 700,000 acre-feet per year, <br />equiv,alent to 168 acre-feet per square mile. <br />Thll extreme southerly portion of Colorado lying west of the Con- <br />tinental Divide is drained by San Juan River and its tributaries, most <br />of wliich loin San Juan River in New Mexico. The combined drain- <br />age ll!'rea In Oolorado amounts to 5,889 square miles. The average <br />annual flow across the boundary of Colorado during the 10-year <br />period ending September 30, 1950, was about 1,880,000 acre-feet, <br />equivMent to 319 acre-feet per square mile. <br />Most of such variations in runoff per square mile of drainage area <br />are due to differences in the elevation of the watersheds. Precipita- <br />tion on the high mountains is much greater than in areas of lower <br />elevation and consumptive uses at high altitudes are less, due to pre- <br />vailing low temperatures and shorter growing seasons. Hence, a <br />large j:)art of the total contribution of each stream originates near its <br />headwltters. For example, the average runoff per square mile from <br />drainage areas above 9,000 feet in elevation, for the same 10-year <br />period,' was found to be 1,000 acre-feet per year on the RoarinK Fork, <br />600 acte-feet per year in the Colorado River Basin east of Gore Range, <br />and 440 acre-feet per year in the upper portion of Gunnison River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />".: <br /> <br />LIMITATIONS ON USE <br /> <br />Colorado has entered into two interstate compacts limiting its use <br />of Oolor;ado River water: the Colorado River Oompact signed in 1922; <br />the UpI1er Colorado RiverBasin Compact signed in 1948. The former <br />allocate!l the waters of the stream system between the upper basin and <br />the Lower Basin; the latter allocated the Upper Basin share among the <br />States in that basin. <br /> <br />OoloradO, River Oompact <br />During the 30 years which have elapsed since the Colorado River <br />Oompac~ became effective, many disputes have arisen regarding the <br />intent and applicability of various provisions. However, for purposes <br />of this report we need be concerned only with two sections of Article <br />III in w~ich the waters of the Colorado River system are allocated; <br />(a) Thete is hereby apportioned from the Colorado River system in perpetuity <br />to the UPRer Basin and to the Lower Basin, respectively, the exclusive beneficial <br />consumptIve use of 7,500,000 acre-feet of water per annum, which shall include <br />all water n~cessary for the supply of any rights which may now exist. <br />* * * * * * * <br />(d) The :States of the upper division will not cause the flow of the river at <br />Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75 million acre-feet for any period <br />of 10 conse'cutive years reckoned in continuing progressive series beginning with <br />the first da! of October next succeeding the ratification of this compact. <br />When this compact was negotiated it was thought that the flow <br />of Colorado River under natural conditions would average considerably <br />more than 15 million acre-feet per year. It is now evident that such <br />is not thei case and that the provisions of section (d) of Article III <br />will probaibly limit depletions of the waters of the upper basin to <br />some amount less than that allocated in section (a) of the same article. <br />In order for the requirement of section Cd) of Article III to have <br />been satisfied during the past 36 years, with depletions in the upper <br />basin aggregating 7.5 million acre-feet per lear, it would have been <br />necessary to have had 38 million acre-feet 0 reservoir capacity avail- <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.'_ ',0<'" <br /> <br />. <br />",' <br /> <br />!~ ~. <br /> <br />',~ ' <br /> <br /> <br />-,"" <br /> <br />I <br />