Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />o <br />,,:J <br />CJJ <br />(::;J <br />c:o <br />l\:) <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />DEPLETION OF WATER SUPPLIES ALLOCATED TO STATE OF <br />COLORADO BY COLORADO RIVER COMPACTS <br /> <br />. Expa:nsion of agriculture, development of industry, and growth of <br />the cities of Colorado depend upon the most effective use of the avail- <br />able supplies of water. Substantially complete use has already been <br />made of those portions of the total flow of Platte River, Arkansas <br />River,aJJ,d Rio Grande to which Colorado is entitled. The contrary <br />is true, however, in the case of Colorado River l>nd its tributl>ries. <br />Hence, the bl>sic question: Is the amount of water available to Colo- <br />rado from this last source more than will be needed to satisfy all reason- <br />able beneticial uses within the drainage basin of Colorado River? <br />It,sholild be obvious to everyone familiar with physical cOnditions <br />that all of the woter to which Colorado is entitled under the provisions <br />of the Cqlorado River compact and the upper Colorado River Basin <br />Compact could be consumed in the irrigation of lands on the western <br />slope if nQ limit were to be placed on costs of construction and opera- <br />tion of irrigation works. It is equally true, although less apparent, <br />that all of the present surplus of Colorado River water could be con- <br />sumed' in' industrial processes if again there were no economic <br />limitations. <br />It follows, therefore, that existing conflicts between interests in <br />different parts of Colorado and potential conflicts between agricultural <br />and .industrial users of water on the western slope cannot be reconciled <br />linless reaslmable limits are placed upon the cost of providing water <br />to satisfy each potential demand upon the available supply from Colo~ <br />rado River;and its tributaries. <br /> <br />WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />.... The surp\us now available for agricultural, industrial, and other pur- <br />posesis materially less than might be presumed from observation of <br />the flow of the rivers on the western slope during the period, of snow- <br />melt each year, Under the provisions of the Colorado River Compact <br />some of the~e floodwaters must be passed down for use in the lower <br />basin, and by the Compact of 1948 Colorado agreed to limit its use of <br />water to a little more than one-half of the total allocated to the upper <br />basin. . <br />. The annu~l discharge of Colorado River and each of its tributaries <br />varies through wide limits and there has been a tendency for wet years <br />to occur in groups, followed by extended periods in which the runoff <br />ili generally l~ss than the long-time average. . For example, the quan- <br />tity of wate}\ passing Lee Ferry in northern Arizona, the point of <br />delivery to the lower basin, averaged 15.9 million acre-feet per year <br />for the 17 ye~s from October 1,1913, to September 30,1930, as com- <br />pared to only, 11.7 million acre-feet per year for the next 23 years; <br />also, thehistoi'ical runoff at Lee Ferry ranged from a maximum of 18.0 <br />million acre-feet to a minimum of 4.4 million acre-feet within this last <br />period in whicl,1 the average was 11.7 millionacre-feet per year. <br /> <br />60526--55----2 1 <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />[; <br /> <br /> <br />.- <br />