Laserfiche WebLink
<br />]I' C <br />I <br />'I II Post hoc comparisons from ANOV A oftotal biomass and 55 <br />" 8 <br /> r-~ mean biomass of commonly collected fishes in San Juan <br /> ;...c.'lo River secondary channels during spring inventories <br /> C...-l <br /> .~. Rare fishes captured in San Juan River secondary <br /> 12 59 <br /> channels during spring inventories, 1993-1997 <br /> 13 Attributes of spring runoff, San Juan River, 71 <br /> 1991-1997 <br /> 14 Mean water quality parameters of San Juan River 73 <br /> primary and secondary channels during summer <br /> inventories, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 15 Occurrence of fishes in San Juan River secondary 76 <br /> channels during summer, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 16 Fish species collected in San Juan River secondary 78 <br /> channels during summer inventories, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 17 Number and abundance of fishes in San Juan River 80 <br /> secondary channels in Geomorphic Reach 5 during <br /> summer, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 18 Results of linear regression analysis of relationship 82 <br /> between spring runoff attributes and summer secondary <br /> chaImel abundance of red shiner in Geomorphic Reach 5, <br /> San Juan River, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 19 Results of linear regression analysis of relationship 82 <br /> between spring runoff attributes and summer secondary <br /> channel abundance of fathead minnow in Geomorphic <br /> Reach 5, Sanjuan River, 1991-1997 <br /> 20 Results oflinear regression analysis of relationship 84 <br /> between spring runoff attributes and summer secondary <br /> channel abundance of speckled dace in Geomorphic <br /> Reach 5, San Juan River, 1991 - 1997 <br /> 21 Results oflinear regression analysis of relationship 84 <br /> between spring runoff attributes and summer secondary <br /> channel abundance of tlannelmouth sucker in Geomorphic <br /> Reach 5, San Juan River, 1991 - 1997 <br /> <br />VIII <br />