Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.- , <br /> <br />-', - <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Proposed Alternatives <br />3/5/31 <br />3 -, 3 - 3 - 3 <br /> <br />Alternati ve 0: <br /> <br />Without Plans condition; no action alternative. <br /> <br />No segments are recomTlended for desi gnati on. (Change from OEIS/SR: <br />unchanged except for new Segment 8, however the area remains unrecom- <br />mended for designation.) <br />~ .' ._- ..- <br />Management Oi recti on -- Provi de integrated, multi-resource management. <br />1. Land Acquisition -- only minor adjustments to facilitate efficient management <br />outside developed enclaves: L&WCF composite. <br />2. Water Resources Development -- no major developments anticipated beyond <br />Sheep Creek and Rockwell Reservoirs: some modification of waten~ay to allow <br />improvements to Highway 14 and new fish management by state. <br />3. Rights-of-Way -- requests considered on case basis by Environmental Analysis <br />4. Mining -- subject to valid, existing rights: some sand/gravel operations (with <br />safeguards) within river course. <br />5. Recreation -- emphasis on developing facilities to absorb use and protect basis resour <br />a. Use & Access: River administered under County permit, no limitations to <br />other recreation use. <br />b. Facilities -- 2 campgrounds of 100 units, in Segments 2 & 3: some closure <br />of smaller facil i ti es in Segment 2 <br />6. Resource Management -- some vegetative manipulation in Segments 1, 2, & 3 to <br />benefit wildlife, management for consumptive uses <br />a. Scenic, Air, Water -- no degredation below state standards and V.Q.O., <br />safeguards required for development <br />b. Hunting/Fishing -- present management projected into future <br /> <br />91.80 <br /> <br />A lterna ti ve E: <br /> <br />National Economic Development alternative; non-federal alternative. <br /> <br />No segments a~e.recommended for designation, but development poten- <br />t1als are.max1m1zed through the Gray Mountain-Idylwilde project, as <br />proposed 1n the 1980 report by International Engineering Co., Inc. <br />(Change from DEIS/SR: totally new alternative to study process.) <br /> <br />Management Direction -- consistent with law and regulation, contributions to <br />National Economic Development maximized. <br />1. Land Acqui s iti on -- none <br />2. Water Resources Development -- assume completion of GM/I oroject as proposed <br />in IECO report of 1980 <br />a. Impoundments -- GM/l and supporti ng facil i ti es <br />b. Modifications of Waterway -- extensive, particularly in areas of project <br />and highway improvement/relocation <br />3. Rights-of-Way -- substantial; project develooment, new recreational access, and <br />highway relocation <br />4. Mining -- inundated areas withdrawn from mineral entry <br />5. Recreation -- substantial construction of improvements and new facilities <br />a. Use & Access -- unlimited access to reservoir facilities; potential <br />limitations to unaffected river segments based on demand <br />b. Facilities -- 2 campgrounds of 100 units in Segments 2 & 3; at least one <br />major marina facility; boat launching ramps; new campground <br />of 100 units in Segment 4 near I feature <br />6. Resource Management -- no limitations beyond present law and regulation; <br />mitigation of impacts of project construction <br />a. Scenic, Air, Water -- significant modifications to existing V.Q.O. in <br />project areas; state law levels for air & water <br />quality to be maintained <br />b. Agriculture -- no limitations within law and regulation <br />c. Wildlife Habitat -- provide alternative winter range for affected big <br />game populations disrupted by impoundments (may <br />entail some limitations to development elsewhere in <br />migratory patterns to assure habitat) <br />